Close

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,501
    Rep Points
    42,506.0
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426


    Yes Reputation No

    FBO 991.2 GT2 RS on race gas vs. stock McLaren 720S 1/4 mile drag races

    The reality of the situation is that the McLaren 720S simply outmuscles a Porsche 991.2 GT2 RS in stock form. In order to play with a Mclaren 720S, the 991.2 GT2 RS needs some tuning. Fortunately, this GT2 RS has a full exhaust, ECU tune, and is running race gas.

    Click here to enlarge

    It still isn't enough (yes the 720S is on R888R tires which make a difference).

    You will notice in the video below (skip to the 5:00 minute mark) the GT2 RS gets the better launch but the 720S still catches up and pulls showing it indeed is still the faster car.

    They both run 10.1X but the 720S is trapping higher than the tuned GT2 RS at 140.58 miles per hour:

    Click here to enlarge

    The cars are close enough that it is a driver's race between them:

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Still, if the 720S added a tune the GT2 RS would be done for. The GT2 RS would then need upgraded turbos.

    Incredible machines.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    409
    Rep Points
    527.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Both cars are downright monsters. The 720s is clearly the top dog of this era of super cars. I just feel like everyone forgets the Porsche is down two cylinders, when you take that into account itís really impressive.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    414
    Rep Points
    966.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Yes Reputation No
    Same 4.0L displacement.

    720s punches well above its weight class. Very efficient at putting power to ground.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,501
    Rep Points
    42,506.0
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Zombie1 Click here to enlarge
    Both cars are downright monsters. The 720s is clearly the top dog of this era of super cars. I just feel like everyone forgets the Porsche is down two cylinders, when you take that into account it’s really impressive.
    The displacement is 3.8 vs. 4.0 so even if it is down two cylinders it's basically a wash.

    I do prefer the McLaren motor design though.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Points
    801.6
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    There are several benefits to having more smaller cylinders than less larger cylinders... (from google)



    • Torque directly scales with the number of cylinders
    • Improve the flatness of the torque distribution over revolution speed.
    • Smaller displacement means smaller pistons, shorter rods, or both. Either way, smaller displacement allows for higher revolution speed, and higher acceleration.
    • Smaller combustion chamber will decrease the time required for the flame expansion. This allows for higher revolution speed.
    • The valves are limiting the gas stream into and out of the cylinder. The valves are subject to the surface-volume ratio. Smaller cylinders are easier to fill and empty through the valves, allowing for higher revolution speed.
    • At a given compression rate, smaller cylinders have to withstand less total force, allowing for a lighter engine structure (less weight).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,501
    Rep Points
    42,506.0
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    There are several benefits to having more smaller cylinders than less larger cylinders... (from google)
    That is all true but a 2.0 liter V8 is not going to make up for the displacement gap versus say a 4.0 liter 6.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    414
    Rep Points
    966.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    That is all true but a 2.0 liter V8 is not going to make up for the displacement gap versus say a 4.0 liter 6.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,501
    Rep Points
    42,506.0
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426



    Yes Reputation No
    ^ That's a little bit different...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Points
    801.6
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    That is all true but a 2.0 liter V8 is not going to make up for the displacement gap versus say a 4.0 liter 6.
    Who said anything about 2.0? My comment was in regards to similar displacements as that’s what was previously commented on...3.8 vs 4.0.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,561
    Rep Points
    1,795.1
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    18


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    Who said anything about 2.0? My comment was in regards to similar displacements as that’s what was previously commented on...3.8 vs 4.0.
    I was exaggerating the difference to point out ultimately displacement rules.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •