Close

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,520
    Rep Points
    42,517.1
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426


    Yes Reputation No

    0-300 kph comparison - W213 Mercedes-AMG E63 S vs. BMW F90 M5 vs. Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid vs. Cadillac CTS-V

    Comparing speedometer videos like this is flawed but we still get to see what the acceleration looks like from the inside and get a general idea of what is the quickest of the bunch.

    Click here to enlarge

    What we know for Certain is the Cadillac is the slowest. It is not able to hit 300 kph in the alloted distance for testing. Considering the Cadillac is rated at 650 horsepower and it is the lightest of the group that should tell you all you need to know about the accuracy of the German horsepower ratings.

    The E63 S hits an indicated 300 kph first, followed by the F90 M5, and then the Panamera which is very close.

    To get the sprint figures we'll have to wait until Sport Auto publishes the test results.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    248
    Rep Points
    296.4
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,520
    Rep Points
    42,517.1
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426



    Yes Reputation No
    ^ My man! Thank you @Vasily1.

    Do you have anything higher resolution by any chance?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    248
    Rep Points
    296.4
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    The data is from the same magazine as the video. In brief, being ca.100kg lighter doesn't help M5 to loose 2 seconds from 200km/h to 280km/h. Up to 200 from stand still both cars are pretty even.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    248
    Rep Points
    296.4
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    ^ My man! Thank you @Vasily1.

    Do you have anything higher resolution by any chance?
    Sticky, it was fast reply, I will try to make a high res. print screen for you.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,520
    Rep Points
    42,517.1
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Vasily1 Click here to enlarge
    Sticky, it was fast reply, I will try to make a high res. print screen for you.
    Thank you.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    140,520
    Rep Points
    42,517.1
    Mentioned
    2455 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    426



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Vasily1 Click here to enlarge
    The data is from the same magazine as the video. In brief, being ca.100kg lighter doesn't help M5 to loose 2 seconds from 200km/h to 280km/h. Up to 200 from stand still both cars are pretty even.
    It says Auto Motor Und Sport though and not Sport Auto?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    248
    Rep Points
    296.4
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Here you are with high res. image.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    248
    Rep Points
    296.4
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    Yes Reputation No
    Can't attach it.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    248
    Rep Points
    296.4
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    .....
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Points
    801.6
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    I hope this test is redone with the F90 M5 CP, I think a little more power will put the M5 at the top.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    98
    Rep Points
    112.2
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Yes Reputation No
    Isnt the CTS-V also the only RWD car in the testing group?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,565
    Rep Points
    1,798.4
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    18


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ///M3THOD Click here to enlarge
    Isnt the CTS-V also the only RWD car in the testing group?
    Yes

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Points
    801.6
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    Its also the lightest car by at least 200lbs vs. the M5, has the 2nd highest peak horsepower and the highest peak torque.

    But those power/torque numbers are all skewed to what the german companies report, they either make more than reported or the CTS-V makes less than its reporting. Can't have it both ways...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    578
    Rep Points
    961.0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Just came across this on IG. Interesting how in comparison videos, the AMG usually pulls, but in real life, the M5 takes the lead.


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •