Close

    • What is the better track car? BMW F87 M2 Competition vs. Toyota GR Supra

      We already know the laptimes and what car is considered more fun to drive as MotorTrend already released this into in their 2019 Best Driver's Car competition. What we get is a 'new' video directly comparing the BMW F87 M2 Competition and the new Toyota GR Supra.


      The F87 M2 Competition is a big step up as it gets the S55 motor from the F80 M3 and F82 M4. Power is easily on the side of the M2 but it also balloons up in weight. Depending on options, it can top 36XX pounds. That is crazy for a 2-Series and essentially M4 weight.

      The B58 in the Supra is no slouch but you can only mate it to an 8-speed automatic. The Supra also obviously does not have rear seats. It is lighter by roughly 300 pounds which on the racetrack is significant along with its lower center of gravity.

      So which is quicker around Laguna Seca?


      The M2 leads most of the way but the Supra comes out on top at the very end just edging the M2. Maybe Randy Pobst went a little wide in the M2?

      Either way, it's a driver's race. Both seem quite capable although Randy Pobst chooses the M2 as the Supra is not as much and the electronics seem more intrusive.

      If the Supra offered a manual or even DCT option the choice would be tougher here.


      This article was originally published in forum thread: What is the better track car? BMW F87 M2 Competition vs. Toyota GR Supra started by Sticky View original post
      Comments 5 Comments
      1. Torgus's Avatar
        Torgus -
        I know which one looks like a sports car and which one looks like what my mom drives.

        FUGLY muffler on the BMW and it just looks...fat and tall compared to the supra.

        F the Zupra long live the rear engine corvette for the same price and 100X cooler.
      1. nbrigdan's Avatar
        nbrigdan -
        I prefer how the Supra looks but the 8-speed auto being the only option is a disappointment. They make a stick in the 440i, so why not offer one for Supra? It's already paired to the B58. I suppose it could be a packaging thing, just seems wrong that the Supra doesn't have a proper performance trans option (DCT or stick, whichever). Agree with Torgus on the looks of the M2...especially in white.
      1. nbrigdan's Avatar
        nbrigdan -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
        The M2 leads most of the way but the Supra comes out on top at the very end just edging the M2. Maybe Randy Pobst went a little wide in the M2?
        They do multiple laps for this very reason, and then the best one is posted up. I'm sure even being a top professional there are still small errors in every lap.
      1. onurleft's Avatar
        onurleft -
        One of the biggest flaws to the C8 vette is the DCT trans. Each unit costs the manufacturer 10k - and not only that forced GM to use expensive parts in the back of the car to balance out all the additional weight. Had most of the engineering team had there way and switched it to the auto (which wasn't ready when they chose to develop the DCT), the car would've been lighter and significantly cheaper. They are also just as fast and smoother - on paper with how they do converters now, there's no reason to use DCT other than bragging rights.


        The M2 is the better car if you want to row your own gears, hands down. Nothing is better then that when you want it. It's also the better engine if you want reliability (cooling) for long periods of time on the track

        Ignoring that - just look at where the weight is on the two in the picture. It's like comparing Mustang to Corvette. Obviously one is lighter, with more of the weight down lower. That to me makes it significantly better for the driver
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by onurleft Click here to enlarge
        One of the biggest flaws to the C8 vette is the DCT trans. Each unit costs the manufacturer 10k - and not only that forced GM to use expensive parts in the back of the car to balance out all the additional weight.
        Completely wrong.

        First of all, they finally got with the times. It only took them until 2020.

        Secondly, it's a transaxle design. It is where the weight is that counts and also it doesn't weigh any more than the automatic.

        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by onurleft Click here to enlarge
        Had most of the engineering team had there way and switched it to the auto (which wasn't ready when they chose to develop the DCT), the car would've been lighter and significantly cheaper.
        Cheaper, yes. Lighter, no.

        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by onurleft Click here to enlarge
        hey are also just as fast and smoother - on paper with how they do converters now, there's no reason to use DCT other than bragging rights.
        They're closer than ever but after driving both it isn't the same experience. The GM automatic is garbage in my opinion compared to the PDK. No matter what you do it won't match the interaction or shift speed. The auto felt sloppy, the PDK is precise.

        Auto would make the C8 better? Please.