Close

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 79
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    925
    Rep Points
    591.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    he better have no speed governor because GT3 doesnt stop at 130,155. You better be fast from 130 to 180 because thats the huge gap in the vid. GT3 you seriously have to stop at 130 because in the vids it looks like a rape you are going 180 at the end of each run. Unfair. 60-130 its what is important.
    My bad, it was not my intention. I forgot you had the speed limiter. Im used to doing 60-170 runs, as I think the acceleration at high speeds is really important. Please remove your speed limiter Click here to enlarge You know this bids were done just to get a comparison, nothing more.
    Last edited by GT3; 11-13-2010 at 08:24 PM.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    1,988
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GT3 Click here to enlarge
    My bad, it was not my intention. I forgot you had the speed limiter. Im used to doing 60-170 runs, as I think the acceleration at high speeds is really important. Please remove your speed limiter Click here to enlarge You know this bids were done just to get a comparison, nothing more.
    I know you didnt I just thought I should point it out. Its all good.
    Click here to enlarge

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    925
    Rep Points
    591.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Yes Reputation No
    Seriously though, remove your speed limiter Click here to enlarge

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    1,988
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    I will.
    Click here to enlarge

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,426
    Rep Points
    32,105.4
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    thats my 335 and I was asleep on that first run lol

    Mods: JB3 2.0 , Injen Intake, Cp-e Intercooler , VK Downpipes , Muffler Delete , Dunlop Direzza Star Spec's

    I was running Map 9 with MS 103 VP Racing Fuel

    I hold on from 60 to 125. After that he takes off.

    I think this 2010 GT3 does 11.307s 1/4 mile @ 118.479 mph

    ??? WHP ??? tq
    You need meth.

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,426
    Rep Points
    32,105.4
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    jesus. the 335 was smoked. t was a "little" bit better on 9 vs 8, but nowhere near enough.

    powerful GT3 man. id like to see how we match up. but you have oddjob nearyby. He should prove a worthy adversary.
    That's how I see it, the GT3 pulls quickly and decisively each time.

    Don't want to seem like im putting Frank down or anything as props to him for getting out there but the GT3 makes easy work of his car. I don't think meth would reverse the outcome but would not hurt.

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    818
    Posts
    530
    Rep Points
    549.2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Wow that GT3 put a smack down I'm surprised I really thought the 335 would've been at least neck and neck for some reason.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,927
    Rep Points
    1,376.8
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14


    Yes Reputation No
    No meth, no chance.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    1,988
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    I do need meth. Funny thing is if we had raced to 130 mph the reponse from you guys would have been way different... lol Seriously I dont understand how people fail to see that I wasn't raped. I just cant go past 155 and once I hit that Governor my car bumps down to 145. The GT3 is going 170+ in these runs.
    At 130 the GT3 is no more than 1 car length and a few feet from me. I think I did really good having a massive 500 pound disadvantage.
    Last edited by 1cleanAMG; 11-14-2010 at 11:40 AM.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    espaņa
    Posts
    751
    Rep Points
    816.9
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    500 lb = 226.796 kg

    200 kilos put the gt3 and see what you do with it, it will destroy

    loa you did well, a bit of methanol on Map 9 and you'll be there next
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    925
    Rep Points
    591.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    I do need meth. Funny thing is if we had raced to 130 mph the reponse from you guys would have been way different... lol Seriously I dont understand how people fail to see that I wasn't raped. I just cant go past 155 and once I hit that Governor my car bumps down to 145. The GT3 is going 170+ in these runs.
    At 130 the GT3 is no more than 1 car length and a few feet from me. I think I did really good having a massive 500 pound disadvantage.
    The only vid that really looks like that if the first one, and as posted, you were on the wrong map. All other runs I went up to 160-170mph but no more than 170 mph.
    I think and hope that people really just focus on the first 10-12 seconds of each reach. I haven't seen anyone used the term "raped" other than you. I look forward to a future re-mach, in which you have your speed limiter removed, have meth, and a higher octane fuel than 103 octane for your map 9 setting. Your car did do great. Cars with your weight need 500+whp and 520wtq (turbo cars like the 997.1 turbos), in order to be even or real real close to my GT3. Rmember, my car is just under 3000lbs with a full tank of gas. Your weight disadvantage is greater that 500 lbs, probably close to 700lbs.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    26
    Rep Points
    11.2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Running a tuned GT3 in a 335 with a basic tune with race gas may not be the best match up but is a great way to get a base and to see the potential of the heavy N54 daily driven car with basic mods against a light, really fast race prepped car.

    Upgraded turbos, meth, fine tune ur tune, diet, and while i'm not sure of the outcome it would be a hella race to see.

    Speeds of 140..160-170 are insane, I don't think I want to go that fast but love watching these vids.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,426
    Rep Points
    32,105.4
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No
    I just find the GT3 incredibly impressive. All motor 6 cylinder that has been around forever that puts down over 100 WHP per liter. That is insane, I'm glad someone still makes a top of the line high revving NA motor like this.

    Also, I find it funny that no one is saying anything about torque here, lol, the N54 has a lot more, how did that help?

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    1,988
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    I hope no one thinks that im upset. this where friendly runs. I just thought people here should now that the huge gap is because of the limitations. I need some stuff done before im up to par. we will continue experimenting.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,462
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    I find it funny that no one is saying anything about torque here, lol, the N54 has a lot more, how did that help?
    thats how he was able to stay as close as he did Click here to enlarge

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    925
    Rep Points
    591.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    I hope no one thinks that im upset. this where friendly runs. I just thought people here should now that the huge gap is because of the limitations. I need some stuff done before im up to par. we will continue experimenting.
    Right, regardless, it was already established that there was a about a 3 car length difference by 150 mph. And no, these results of the cars should not reserve any judgement on the owners. We don't make these cars, but they are great to compare side by side.

    I'll be setting something up some with Dad'sC63 (C63 by MHP), Oddjob and some other cars, soon. I wish Byzantine came down somewhere near FL with his Gallardo Click here to enlarge
    Last edited by GT3; 11-14-2010 at 07:53 PM.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,426
    Rep Points
    32,105.4
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    thats how he was able to stay as close as he did Click here to enlarge
    Yet, the car with less torque is faster, right? So what does that tell you about HP and gearing?

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,462
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    you mean weight dont you..

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    925
    Rep Points
    591.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Yes Reputation No
    Im not too familiar with 335i's... Can anyone here kinda confirm what should be FR305's WHP/WTQ with those mods he has, on a dynojet, sae (not std)? His mods, below:

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    Mods: JB3 2.0 , Injen Intake, Cp-e Intercooler , VK Downpipes , Muffler Delete.
    I was running Map 9 with MS 103 VP Racing Fuel, no meth.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,462
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    does he know actual boost? a good guesstimate would be about 420 but cant know anything w/o actual boost

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,426
    Rep Points
    32,105.4
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    you mean weight dont you..
    From a roll going up past 150? No I don't, it is a factor but not as big of one especially the higher up you go.

    I just find it funny N54 people always talk about torque this and torque that, and then top end HP takes em...

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    1,988
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    From a roll going up past 150? No I don't, it is a factor but not as big of one especially the higher up you go.

    I just find it funny N54 people always talk about torque this and torque that, and then top end HP takes em...
    What HP??? He has the same WHP as me!!! Its the weight...
    Click here to enlarge

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,462
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    What HP??? He has the same WHP as me!!! Its the weight...
    did you log the runs?

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    1,988
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    did you log the runs?
    No. I did get a lot of half engine lights and had to stop on the shoulder to turn the car off and on again. It wasn't running smooth maybe because it was the first time on that map and octane or the MS 103 is below 100 oct.
    Click here to enlarge

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    925
    Rep Points
    591.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    What HP??? He has the same WHP as me!!! Its the weight...
    HP yes; however, you do have about 100 wheel torque on me...

    The weight, aerodynamics, gearing, instant throttle response, and power/torque delivery of the 997.2 GT3 have a lot to do with the results in the videos.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •