Close

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Bren Tuning Stage 2 2008 BMW 335xi 6AT - BMS DCI, VRSF dp's and ic - 379 whp

    93 octane, baseline was 328 whp. Thought this wasn't bad especially on a Mustang at all four wheels:


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    59
    Rep Points
    83.7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    328whp baseline on a mustang dyno is high. My baseline (335i) on a mustang dyno was 276whp and 280wtq in fifth gear.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Roanoke VA
    Posts
    1,632
    Rep Points
    2,248.3
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    23


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I think the "baseline" was an OTS map.
    Click here to enlarge
    MOTIV750, MOTIV P-1000 PI, MOTIV/FUEL-IT! low pressure fuel system, AEM EMS/COBB AP, Aquamist HFS-3, ETS FMIC, SPEC stage 3+ clutch/SS flywheel, BC Racing coilovers and VMR wheels wrapped in Hankook RS3s.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Points
    2,516.7
    Mentioned
    67 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    26


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Yea i'm def inclined to agree Allen

    330 all wheel as a baseline? On a mustang? Not possible, or that is the highest reading mustang dyno on the eastern seaboard.

    Final results are strong regardless though. If it doesn’t bog I bet that thing is pretty nasty out of the hole.
    E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Motiv Port Fuel/BMR 3.5" Exhaust/ER CP/Synapse/VRSF FMIC/Rob Beck PCV Valve + Cap/ST Coilovers/M3 FCA + Tension Rods/M3 Subframe Bushings/M3 FSB/AA Strutbrace/DINAN Camber Plates/Apex ARC-8/Project Kics/VAC Hubs/Rogue Transmission Mounts/Alpina TCU Flash/Icarbon/Kerscher/BMW Performance
    F30 335 X-Drive EBII....PPK otherwise Stock
    Click here to enlarge

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    2,936
    Rep Points
    2,858.8
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    29


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Mustang dynos are very susceptible to tampering to make the numbers look more impressive. As we all know, they generally read very low compared to DJ. It seems most shops are now calibrating them to read similar to DJ output numbers to drive more sales. The unfortunate truth is that most people paying to dyno their car don't want to have to explain why "the numbers seems so low" to idiots that don't understand the difference between MD, DJ, DD, etc etc etc.
    2011 E90 M3 \ Melbourne Rot Metallic

    Click here to enlarge

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ovitrix Click here to enlarge
    328whp baseline on a mustang dyno is high. My baseline (335i) on a mustang dyno was 276whp and 280wtq in fifth gear.
    That 328 whp baseline is with a tune.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    59
    Rep Points
    83.7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    That 328 whp baseline is with a tune.
    Makes more sense. I thought was a stock baseline.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    112
    Rep Points
    181.3
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    That 328 whp baseline is with a tune.
    Yeah, I saw somewhere the 'baseline' was a Stg2 OTS map.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JC335xi Click here to enlarge
    Yeah, I saw somewhere the 'baseline' was a Stg2 OTS map.
    That's why I found the gains impressive.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    112
    Rep Points
    181.3
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    That's why I found the gains impressive.
    Indeed, I need to venture up there one of these days. He is only about an hour from my house.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    112
    Rep Points
    181.3
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JC335xi Click here to enlarge
    Yeah, I saw somewhere the 'baseline' was a Stg2 OTS map.
    Found it. From the notes on YouTube, "93oct. Baseline is Cobb Stage2 Aggressive done same day, 328/379"

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •