Close

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,806
    Rep Points
    31,562.6
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Road and Track gets test numbers for the M6 Gran Coupe 6-speed manual - 1/4 mile in 12.1@120.0, 4371 pound curb weight

    Finally some test numbers for the M6 Gran Coupe these courtesy of Road and Track. What makes the results interesting is that Road and Track tested the 6-speed manual version and not the 7-speed DCT. So what was the result? 0-60 in 3.9 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 12.1@120.0. Not bad at all and quicker than any 6-speed manual M5 results posted so far. Additionally, that is a great elapsed time for street tires the Micheline Pilot Super Sports clearly offering some good grip.

    The curb weight for the M6 Gran Coupe comes in at 4371 pounds which is very close to the F10 M5. However, if the Gran Coupe was equipped with the DCT Transmission that weight disparity would likely be close to 100 pounds. The weight distribution is also 52/48 front to rear which is shying a bit away from the BMW 50/50 rule we have all come to respect. These turbo motors carry a penalty in weight and in its distribution.

    Full results below, some nice driving by Road and Track.

    Click here to enlarge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Jersey City
    Posts
    3,857
    Rep Points
    3,642.6
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Wow, that's quick.... If the new m3 has those numbers stock, watch out!
    Click here to enlarge
    ESS 6XX kit

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,958
    Rep Points
    2,641.0
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    27


    Reputation: Yes | No
    this car will end up being pretty bad ass in the long run

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    974
    Rep Points
    442.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Wow, very impressed. Been waiting for this for a while. Does anybody know what the actual curb weight of the M5 6-speed is? It's weird that these end up being quicker than the 5. Wider rear tires?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    860
    Rep Points
    1,537.7
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    16


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Wow, 4371? What a disgusting fatbody...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    278
    Rep Points
    146.2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    They gave it more powaaaa.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,806
    Rep Points
    31,562.6
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by leveraged sellout Click here to enlarge
    Wow, very impressed. Been waiting for this for a while. Does anybody know what the actual curb weight of the M5 6-speed is? It's weird that these end up being quicker than the 5. Wider rear tires?
    Just subtract around 50 pounds from the DCT figures.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    102
    Rep Points
    182.2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I really like this car. Expensive as hell but nice.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    974
    Rep Points
    442.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Just subtract around 50 pounds from the DCT figures.
    You're right, brain fart on my part.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    95
    Rep Points
    88.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I'd like to see the 1/8 and what it picked up in the back half mph.

    The 1.9 isn't to impressive for a short.

    Does this include roll-out?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,806
    Rep Points
    31,562.6
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Droptopp Click here to enlarge
    Does this include roll-out?
    I have no idea. This was probably done on a Vbox.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    298
    Rep Points
    272.3
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    I drove an M6 Gran Coupe at a BMW M Drive event recently. I would say that it's the heaviest and least sporty from the M6/M6/M6GC. On a damp track, while the e92 M3 was near impossible to slide at low speeds, with the M6 GC you couldn't even take a tight turn (while NOT accelerating) at 20-25mph without sliding. It's quite heavy. However it accelerates very quickly.

    What's interesting is that the BMW M driver taxi driving / demonstrating the cars at the end, always chose an M5 or M3 over an M6 or M6 GC. And when he chose an M6 once, he did the only mistake in that day and managed to spin the car on the track Click here to enlarge

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,806
    Rep Points
    31,562.6
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by cstavaru Click here to enlarge
    I drove an M6 Gran Coupe at a BMW M Drive event recently. I would say that it's the heaviest and least sporty from the M6/M6/M6GC. On a damp track, while the e92 M3 was near impossible to slide at low speeds, with the M6 GC you couldn't even take a tight turn (while NOT accelerating) at 20-25mph without sliding. It's quite heavy. However it accelerates very quickly.

    What's interesting is that the BMW M driver taxi driving / demonstrating the cars at the end, always chose an M5 or M3 over an M6 or M6 GC. And when he chose an M6 once, he did the only mistake in that day and managed to spin the car on the track Click here to enlarge
    Kind of a shame to hear M's have become AMG's.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    974
    Rep Points
    442.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Thats interesting, some of the auto journalists were fairly happy with how the M6GC handled, at least at a track day event at Circuit of the Americas. Although at that weight it won't be an M3. BMW says it is supposed to be tighter than the M5...which is one thing that attracted me to it. But if that's not the case then I'm disappointed in BMW. Again. This has been happening a lot lately...and lots of nice surprises from AMG...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,806
    Rep Points
    31,562.6
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by leveraged sellout Click here to enlarge
    I'm disappointed in BMW. Again. This has been happening a lot lately...and lots of nice surprises from AMG...
    Truth...

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •