Close

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,425
    Rep Points
    32,105.3
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No

    Car and Driver tests the updated xDrive/all wheel drive long wheelbase 2013 F01 Alpina B7 with the N63TU V8 featuring 540 horsepower

    The Alpina B7 got a horsepower bump as did every BMW N63 powered car (50i powered models, SUV's did not get the updated motor) thanks to the addition of Valvetronic and software changes. Alpina takes things a bit further with their upgraded turbochargers, intercoolers, and forged internals for an output of 540 horsepower over 445 horsepower of the 750i. This makes the Alpina B7 the closest thing to a BMW M7 that one can actually purchase since for now BMW thinks an M 7-Series does not fit the brand although SUV's somehow do.

    Click here to enlarge

    Regardless, Car and Driver got pretty good numbers out of the car. A 12.2@115 1/4 mile which is much better than the 12.6@113 MotorTrend achieved when the 2013 Alpina B7 was put up against the 2013 Audi S8 and quite simply crushed. This is thanks to this being the all wheel drive version so a better launch was possible. The weight difference is pretty substantial however with Car and Driver weighing the all wheel drive long wheelbase B7 at 5037 pounds versus MotorTrend getting 4712 for the rear wheel drive. Over 300 pounds, significant, which makes it impressive the car trapped higher despite the all wheel drive and weight penalty.

    The car pulls an impressive .93g on the skidpad even with its heft. A very well tuned chassis by Alpina.

    Car and Driver really liked the 2013 B7 but criticized the steering and feedback which is a shame. Is this car worth the premium of about $40-$50k over a standard 750i for a total of $146,845 as tested? Probably only if there isn't an Audi S8 next to it which is faster, more fun to drive, lighter, and cheaper.

    Click here to enlarge


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,590
    Rep Points
    2,018.0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21


    Yes Reputation No
    That's a very fast sedan - especially when you consider it's weight. 0-100 in less time than a stock E60 M5? Amazing.

    You bring up a good point: why does BMW make "M series" sport utility vehicles, and not things like an M7? Whoever is ruining the marketing overe there needs a pulse.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    515
    Rep Points
    621.9
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    "Test notes: Not a chirp during launch"

    Thats why it can pull on a e60 m5 in a 0-100 race....538lb-ft (not the wheel torque number i know) getting to the pavement almost immediately through all wheel drive traction.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,425
    Rep Points
    32,105.3
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DFM Click here to enlarge
    "Test notes: Not a chirp during launch"

    Thats why it can pull on a e60 m5 in a 0-100 race....538lb-ft (not the wheel torque number i know) getting to the pavement almost immediately through all wheel drive traction.
    True but I'm struggling to understand the rear wheel drive cars slower trap with a lot less weight although different mags different days. I feel like this one is almost stronger after the fact or maybe it is just in the launch thanks to all wheel drive.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    515
    Rep Points
    621.9
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    True but I'm struggling to understand the rear wheel drive cars slower trap with a lot less weight although different mags different days. I feel like this one is almost stronger after the fact or maybe it is just in the launch thanks to all wheel drive.
    We need 60' times.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,425
    Rep Points
    32,105.3
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DFM Click here to enlarge
    We need 60' times.
    These mags adhere to their old data standards. 60' should have been added ages ago.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Valley Stream NY
    Posts
    3,350
    Rep Points
    2,779.7
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    28


    Yes Reputation No
    Its the x drive. RWD with that kinda torque will just incinerate tires.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Points
    3,343.8
    Mentioned
    226 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    34


    Yes Reputation No
    My cousin has one. Absolutely love the car in person.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Mandeville, LA.
    Posts
    84
    Rep Points
    203.1
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    Yes Reputation No
    I'm just glad they finally did something after being stomped by the S8 in MT. Long way to go but at least they woke up a bit

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,425
    Rep Points
    32,105.3
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FRD135i Click here to enlarge
    I'm just glad they finally did something after being stomped by the S8 in MT. Long way to go but at least they woke up a bit
    Didn't really do much other than add xDrive it seems...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    710
    Rep Points
    567.0
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by inlineS54B32 Click here to enlarge
    That's a very fast sedan - especially when you consider it's weight. 0-100 in less time than a stock E60 M5? Amazing.

    You bring up a good point: why does BMW make "M series" sport utility vehicles, and not things like an M7? Whoever is ruining the marketing overe there needs a pulse.
    Because they are selling better than most M cars.
    Honda CBR 1000RR, Superbike Supply, Arrow, HRC, BMC, Lee's Cycle, Galfer, EBC, Revzilla, AXO, Dainese, Scorpion Helmets

    Honda Grom, most fun you'll ever have on 2 wheels.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,425
    Rep Points
    32,105.3
    Mentioned
    2106 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by StinkyM Click here to enlarge
    Because they are selling better than most M cars.
    True but the argument if they do the SUV's why not the 7 which is arguably more deserving?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,030
    Rep Points
    136.7
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Yes Reputation No
    Jesus christ the cars are just getting heavier and heavier lol

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,927
    Rep Points
    1,376.8
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14


    Yes Reputation No
    Big difference only by adding xi.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •