Close

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 76

Thread: M2 render!!!

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    That article says I6
    It also says N54, it won't be.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    Check out this interesting info about the M2 from Car and Driver.

    http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-detailed-news
    Nice, they basically confirm it.

    Here's their rendering:

    Click here to enlarge

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,853
    Rep Points
    2,387.6
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    24


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I have nothing against I4 obviously lol. I just hope they don't over complicate it so it takes 5 years to see tuning and parts for it.
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    I have nothing against I4 obviously lol. I just hope they don't over complicate it so it takes 5 years to see tuning and parts for it.
    With BMW's it's always this way. Kind of frustrating and I'm personally sick of it.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,040
    Rep Points
    938.4
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10



    Reputation: Yes | No
    I dont know why they would say an upgraded N54....
    ​#Chuckstrong

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    I dont know why they would say an upgraded N54....
    Because a lot of what they pass off is just guessing... and in this case not even a good educated guess.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,853
    Rep Points
    2,387.6
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    24


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    With BMW's it's always this way. Kind of frustrating and I'm personally sick of it.
    I agree. Look at the new M3 engine bay Click here to enlarge
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


  8. #58
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    47
    Rep Points
    38.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    People already throwin out "E30 M3" comparisons to this car that isn't even confirmed yet, just because its a 4-banger? I want to get excited too but haven't we been let down in one way or another with every subsequent M car SINCE the E30 M3 (maybe except e39 M5)? With each generation of M since the first M3, driver involvement has gone down. Hoping an M2 would reverse that trend a bit.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DubSport Click here to enlarge
    People already throwin out "E30 M3" comparisons to this car that isn't even confirmed yet, just because its a 4-banger? I want to get excited too but haven't we been let down in one way or another with every subsequent M car SINCE the E30 M3 (maybe except e39 M5)? With each generation of M since the first, driver involvement has gone down. Hoping an M2 would reverse that trend a bit.
    Nobody is comparing it to the E30 M3. I strongly doubt it will improve on the drivers experience of that car. No M has since and the closest thing to offer as much driving excitement is the E46 M3 CSL. One may be better than the other depending on how much you like technology.

    Regardless, the reason it is brought up is because the E30 M3 was sold with a four cylinder motor while a six cylinder was available. However, there also likely were racing regulations in mind as well. This car won't be racing anything. That said, with a similar motor to the M3 it may be too close but BMW would have a much larger motor than Mercedes or Audi in the segment.

    We'll see what happens. I'm all for a new M turbo four-cylinder. Re-using the N55 is boring and it isn't an M motor.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    284
    Rep Points
    0.8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    It's the exact same thing, how isn't it fair? 6 cylinder versus 4 cylinder.

    Would you rather have a six cylinder in your evo or a sportier 4?

    Get a 235i with the N55 then. I know I would rather have the M2 before even seeing it or its specs. I'd rather have the Audi S4 with the smaller 3.0 TFSI than with the 4.2 liter V8 it used to have as well.
    Its not the same thing. Your talking about .2 liter difference for an efficient 4v s14 vs non efficient 2v m20. More than likely the build and flow efficiency of an m2 engine will not be much different from a n55 but the size difference will be substantial. Speaking of just an engine i would take the six. After market brakes and suspension would be far less than the price of a m. Only thing left is the body but ehh...

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    6500ft ASL
    Posts
    1,055
    Rep Points
    2,094.5
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    when is this supposed to be released?
    If you get 1000hp out of the 4cyl in this, I will be super impressed Click here to enlarge

    -Rich

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by lughed Click here to enlarge
    Its not the same thing. Your talking about .2 liter difference for an efficient 4v s14 vs non efficient 2v m20. More than likely the build and flow efficiency of an m2 engine will not be much different from a n55 but the size difference will be substantial. Speaking of just an engine i would take the six. After market brakes and suspension would be far less than the price of a m. Only thing left is the body but ehh...
    The size difference is mitigated by forced induction, direct injection, and higher compression. The cubes were more important back then.

    It's pretty much the same thing. M 4-Cylinder powerplant versus the standard six-cylinder already available. If it's a dedicated M motor I don't see why it wouldn't have a better build and greater efficiency.

    I say let's wait and see the motor.

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    79
    Rep Points
    49.0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    The size difference is mitigated by forced induction, direct injection, and higher compression. The cubes were more important back then.

    It's pretty much the same thing. M 4-Cylinder powerplant versus the standard six-cylinder already available. If it's a dedicated M motor I don't see why it wouldn't have a better build and greater efficiency.

    I say let's wait and see the motor.
    While the S14 developement came from the M88 motor (an M engine) this time again(like all new M models) bmw will just raise the boost on their N20(and strengthen the heat management). But dont expect modifications as you can find them in a e46 M3 motor(based too on a "normal" engine, but heavy modified), they will be very basic. Not worth calling it an M-powerplant.(dont expect either a new developed engin like the "old" m3 V8).
    Obviously i hope to be wrong and maybe they will put some effort in this project, so the M2 could be very interesting also from an engine point of view.(as a car it will be for sure, no matter what motor they put in it, it will perform good as a car).
    But lets be realistic, the only interesting engine in the whole M lineup will be the new M3 engine. Thats the only model left, that gets a "real build M engine" in every generation.(or at least until now, as in depth technical specs of the new engine are not known(will it have the third e-turbo for lagless engine response?)).
    Bring the new M3 engine in the M2, that would be cool.(like when they brought the m3 engine in the z3m, and the next gen in the z4m, but is bmw still cool? They have to prove as im not sure any more)

  14. #64
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    506
    Rep Points
    758.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I like it!
    Click here to enlarge
    Everyone has a photographic memory, some just don't have film.

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by cisi Click here to enlarge
    bmw will just raise the boost on their N20(and strengthen the heat management). But dont expect modifications as you can find them in a e46 M3 motor(based too on a "normal" engine, but heavy modified), they will be very basic. Not worth calling it an M-powerplant.(dont expect either a new developed engin like the "old" m3 V8).
    I'm afraid you may be right but let's wait and see. the S63tu has some significant upgrades from the N63.

  16. #66
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    18
    Rep Points
    25.4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Nice looking car.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    284
    Rep Points
    0.8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    The size difference is mitigated by forced induction, direct injection, and higher compression. The cubes were more important back then.

    It's pretty much the same thing. M 4-Cylinder powerplant versus the standard six-cylinder already available. If it's a dedicated M motor I don't see why it wouldn't have a better build and greater efficiency.

    I say let's wait and see the motor.
    Size is not mitigated when both engines have fi, direct injection, and so on. Just as the m20 had non of these, neither did the s14. What the s14 did have for mitigation was much better efficiency. I doubt a 2L m engine will be that much more efficient than a n55 to mitigate anything.

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by lughed Click here to enlarge
    I doubt a 2L m engine will be that much more efficient than a n55 to mitigate anything.
    Why? It could have better heads, more aggressive tuning, higher compression, etc. Kind of like the S63tu as already mentioned.

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    CHICAGO
    Posts
    76
    Rep Points
    56.5
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Count me in, looks brilliant. I'm not liking the trend of the vehicles gaining in size to keep up with the a$$es of all us fat Americans...Me not included. I have the body of an Adonis Click here to enlarge

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
    Posts
    3,053
    Rep Points
    1,236.6
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Interesting.... Hope their new turbo motors don't drop torque up top stock like the current ones do. Based on my 1M experience I bet this will be one hell of a fun car to throw through a turn!

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,888
    Rep Points
    1,422.5
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Strangely...this is the only future BMW I have interest in.

    I think I will be moving on to another brand.

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,699
    Rep Points
    31,533.4
    Mentioned
    2063 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by M3_WC Click here to enlarge
    I think I will be moving on to another brand.
    Same.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,924
    Rep Points
    1,825.9
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19


    Reputation: Yes | No
    AMG all the way. BMW is a buncha pussies and sell-offs nowadays. They charge up the ass for everything and their goods just don't deliver anymore. $#@!ing new German Honda indeed. Think their customers are all stupid or something. $#@! them!!! I have been so pissed at them. I'm sure this will be my last BMW model.

    If staying German, I will definitely own an AMG for my next vehicle. Although Audi is getting up there too, but just not enogh excititement yet. American performance cars are also no joke nowadats. BMW is just not exciting no more, and thats a fact every enthusiasts knows. Anyone who disagrees is either in denial or a $#@!ing epic fanboy.
    John 3:16


  24. #74
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,888
    Rep Points
    1,422.5
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Most recent example. The reveal of the M6GC in detroit. Already down half second 0-60 and CLS63 is $15k less.

    BMW...you really are not that special anymore to keep raising prices.


  25. #75
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Posts
    2
    Rep Points
    0.1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    0 out of 3 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    F*ckin’ remarkable things here. I am very glad to see your post. Thank you so much and i am having a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a mail?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •