Close

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272


    Reputation: Yes | No

    600 hp strong G-POWER M3 GT2 S and M3 TORNADO CS

    I really, really like the widebody kit used here. The fenders look more natural than the Vorsteiner kit but it does not allow the use of as wide of tires, running only 315's. Also, not sure how I feel about the vents with the fins. May look better in black.

    The motor is the usual G-power SC setup for both of these.

    G-POWER congratulates BMW Motorsport on its first place in this year’s 24-hour race at the Nürburgring. And, on this race weekend, it presents two road-legal BMW M3 Clubsport models in homage to the BMW works team.

    More than a quarter of a century ago, the history of G-POWER began with the modification of BMW 02 models for competition use. Today, this tradition is carried forward by the G-POWER Motorsport Division established at the beginning of 2010. The function of this newly founded department includes comprehensive care of our motorsport customers, as well as the development of the associated “sports equipment”. The spectrum ranges from reduced-weight and increased-performance road-legal M3 models for “private” track laps to full-blooded racing versions of the M3 with dry weight down to 1,300 kg and output of more than 700 hp, complete with all the associated kit required by private motorsports teams.
    Spectators at this year’s 24-hour race at the Nürburgring had the chance to admire the first creation of the G-POWER Motorsport Division. The G-POWER M3 GT2 S is aimed specifically at customers looking for a vehicle along the lines of the Porsche 911 GT3 RS, but have thus far been unable to find one in the BMW product line-up – thoroughbred racing technology combined with exceptional performance and fully road legal.

    In answer to this demand, we present the G-POWER M3 TORNADO CS as the civilian version of the imposing G-POWER M3 GT2 S. When it comes to performance, both vehicles rely on the mighty SK II CS supercharger system. Following intensive development work, starting with CAD development, and followed by prototype build and extensive test driving and hot weather testing in the United Arab Emirates, this system sets new benchmarks in performance and quality. At the heart of the supercharger system is the high-performance ASA T1-522 radial compressor, which also runs in a similar format in the ALPINA B6 GT3 race car. A dual-flow carbon air intake, a substantial cast aluminium charge air cooler and a cast aluminium airbox provide the fundamentals enabling the maximum charge pressure of 0.5 bar to generate output of 600 hp and 580 Nm. In order that the increased output remains weight neutral, G-POWER uses a titanium exhaust system that delivers a considerable reduction in both back pressure and weight with its manifold and 2 x 100 dcpi metal catalytic converters. The weight advantage versus the series production exhaust system is no less than 26 kg.

    The engine pampering session with G-POWER is all it takes to set the G-POWER Clubsport variants apart from the production standard. A never-ending supply of torque is the name of the game once the forced induction M3 engine stretches its legs out of the mid rev range to storm all the way to the limiter as if fired from a catapult.

    At the same time, G-POWER also gets to work on the flab, placing the BMW M3 on a strict weight loss regime. This is where the G-POWER GT2 S comes into its own, with a full carbon body kit bearing the current GT2 design. The front skirt, all four wings and the rear skirt are all replaced by ultra-lightweight carbon elements. A carbon front lip and the multi-part carbon rear spoiler also improve aerodynamic downforce. On the G-POWER M3 TORNADO CS, a carbon spoiler lip and rear diffuser make for reduced lift. A particularly nice touch is the running lights integrated into the rear diffuser.

    G-POWER was also able to make further savings in the wheel rims. All-new forged SIVERSTONE CLUBSPORT alloy rims measuring 9.0 X 20 inches and 10.5 X 20 inches for the TORNADO CS, and 3-part SILVERSTONE RS forged wheels measuring 9.0 X 20 and 11.5 X 20 inches on the GT2 S significantly reduce unsprung mass, thus delivering better acceleration and greater cornering agility. The TORNADO CS is guaranteed firm grip with the tarmac courtesy of 255/30 ZR 20 and 295/25 ZR 20 MICHELIN Pilot Sport tyres, while the G-POWER GT2 S is fitted with MICHELIN Pilot Sport Cup sports rubber measuring 245/30 R 20 and 315/25 R 20.

    Weight neutral, yet highly effective, is the G-POWER “CLUBSPORT” suspension package. It optimises the BMW M3’s road manners at race track level and encompasses a coilover suspension that is independently adjustable for both compression and rebound, a stabiliser kit for the front and rear axles, as well as support bearings that enable correction of camber or caster.

    On the inside of the vehicle, G-POWER has swapped the series production front seats for carbon racing buckets that not only support the driver in his battle with centrifugal forces, but are also each 12 kg lighter than their standard counterparts. Just like that, another 24 kg disappear. The G-POWER M3 GT2 S also goes without its rear bench, while the interior is upgraded with an individual G-POWER leather trim package. Leather and Alcantara applications in G-POWER orange with blue stitching give the sporty and spartan interior a touch of class and a luxurious feel.

    Overall, the G-POWER weight loss program for the M3 GT2 S adds up to around 150 kg, bringing the dry weight down to less than 1,500 kg. It goes without saying that the supercharged 600 horses take this in their stride. The GT2 S handles the dash from 0-100 km/h in 4.1 seconds. The G-POWER M3 TORNADO CS does the same trip in 4.3 seconds and from 0-200 km in 11.8 seconds. The top speed for both vehicles is limited by transmission ratios. With the 6-speed manual it stands at more than 320 km/h and with the 7-speed DCT at more than 330 km/h.
    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    235
    Rep Points
    174.3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    The cars look sick. G-Power did a really nice job.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Encino, CA
    Posts
    1,161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Great lookin cars!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    The widebody is sick... I just wonder how much it costs and if they will sell it separately. That kit in FRP would sell insanely well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Encino, CA
    Posts
    1,161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I would get a e92 just for this widebody

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by MSpiredM3 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I would get a e92 just for this widebody
    It is pretty sick... and much more cohesive than the Vorsteiner. They are both great.... just wondering how much this thing costs.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Encino, CA
    Posts
    1,161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It is pretty sick... and much more cohesive than the Vorsteiner. They are both great.... just wondering how much this thing costs.
    I hate the Vorsteiner one, besides, I heard that car wasn't running after Bimmerfest and might have blown the motor; compliments of VF

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by MSpiredM3 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I hate the Vorsteiner one, besides, I heard that car wasn't running after Bimmerfest and might have blown the motor; compliments of VF
    I know we are trigger happy but let's hold off on that type of speculation.

    Who would you have heard that from and what would you have to substantiate it?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Encino, CA
    Posts
    1,161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I know we are trigger happy but let's hold off on that type of speculation.

    Who would you have heard that from and what would you have to substantiate it?
    Heard it from someone I believe, you know me, I don't liek to speculate and spread rumors. It MAY not be true, but I'm willing to bet it is. Anywyas, this isn't the thread for this...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by MSpiredM3 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Heard it from someone I believe, you know me, I don't liek to speculate and spread rumors. It MAY not be true, but I'm willing to bet it is. Anywyas, this isn't the thread for this...
    Agreed.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Irvine
    Posts
    12
    Rep Points
    2.2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    On topic, that car looks freaking great overall. I wish the front bumper was a little less flat though, doesn't flow with the openings. Maybe the front bumper alone could take from Vorsteiner's GT3S front bumper replacement a bit.

    For the love of God, NOT from their widebody version though.
    Click here to enlarge
    Click here to enlarge

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Jajima Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    On topic, that car looks freaking great overall. I wish the front bumper was a little less flat though, doesn't flow with the openings. Maybe the front bumper alone could take from Vorsteiner's GT3S front bumper replacement a bit.

    For the love of God, NOT from their widebody version though.
    Ah, I was about to say, this front bumper is WAY better than the Vorsteiner widebody front bumper. This whole kit just looks freaking AWESOME from the front with proportions that work. Where it lacks is the rear end in my opinion.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Irvine
    Posts
    12
    Rep Points
    2.2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Yeah, the center of the rear is a bit TOO OEM, isn't it?
    Click here to enlarge
    Click here to enlarge

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Jajima Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yeah, the center of the rear is a bit TOO OEM, isn't it?
    That is exactly what I was thinking Click here to enlarge

    If only they went with an Ericsson style rear or at least did something different. Other than that, pretty much perfect.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    109,256
    Rep Points
    27,164.6
    Mentioned
    1833 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    272



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Some more pics, hottest widebody out there but $35k!

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •