Close

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 68

Thread: Next generation 2013 F80 M3 spotted testing - Triple turbo? V6? 450 horsepower? Already outgunned?

              
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    101,373
    Rep Points
    24,401.6
    Mentioned
    1550 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    245


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Next generation 2013 F80 M3 spotted testing - Triple turbo? V6? 450 horsepower? Already outgunned?

    BMW continues to test the 2013 F80 M3 which is no surprise as we should see it next year after all with the F30 3 Series having already made its debut. The real question is about the motor, what will it be? Yes, the V8 will be replaced and the motor will be turbocharged. Will it be a tweaked N55? Or will it be the rumored 3.3 liter tri-turbo V6 with 450 horsepower? No matter what the motor choice we should expect power in the 450 range which unfortunately leaves the M3 outgunned both in displacement, power, and tuning potential versus its rivals namely the C63 AMG the next generation of which should get the 5.5 liter twin turbo M157 V8 from AMG.

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    The e92 M3 is/was also outgunned by it's rivals. The S65 is awesome but you have to admit the 414hp and 295lb/ft is pretty much weaksauce.


    But you are right, it would be nice if they would surprise us and throw a detuned version of the M5 motor....
    ​#Chuckstrong

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,915
    Rep Points
    1,826.8
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Looks exactly like an E90 with all the camo. It is a shame they are only aiming at around 450 hp. AMG is doing so much better these days.......

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    101,373
    Rep Points
    24,401.6
    Mentioned
    1550 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    245


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The e92 M3 is/was also outgunned by it's rivals. The S65 is awesome but you have to admit the 414hp and 295lb/ft is pretty much weaksauce.


    But you are right, it would be nice if they would surprise us and throw a detuned version of the M5 motor....
    The only rival to outgun the e92 m3 with dct was the p31 c63 that came out later. The m3 dynos just under a c63 but weighs less, not gunned at all. Next gen is shaping up badly.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,758
    Rep Points
    1,296.2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The e92 M3 is/was also outgunned by it's rivals. The S65 is awesome but you have to admit the 414hp and 295lb/ft is pretty much weaksauce.
    e92 M3 was outgunned by C63 AMG in horsepower and especially torque. Who cares. Big engine is heavy, requires heavy transmission and M3 outgunned Merc in most of the tracks. Bmw is a lot more agile. The new M5 runs circles around Mercs with more power. The new M3 will do the same for C63 AMG. Bmw is the ultimate driving machine. Merc is power without control in comparison.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    142
    Rep Points
    95.7
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    all this v6 talk is really, well, aggravating. I wish we had some confirmation that it's anything else. I prefer a 4 cylinder over a v6. but it wont have the 500hp needed to compete with other manufacturers.

    car looks good though, it's comforting to know that there'll be a f30 M3 sedan. It's sad that the e90M is dead.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,758
    Rep Points
    1,296.2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Wasn't C63 AMG 451 bhp, 444 LB - FT already in 2007? Way more than M3.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    18
    Rep Points
    15.0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    If this indeed does come with a V6 I will leave the brand. This would offer nothing over the GTR.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    101,373
    Rep Points
    24,401.6
    Mentioned
    1550 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    245


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 654 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Wasn't C63 AMG 451 bhp, 444 LB - FT already in 2007? Way more than M3.
    Only on paper not in practice.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    101,373
    Rep Points
    24,401.6
    Mentioned
    1550 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    245


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rezin23 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If this indeed does come with a V6 I will leave the brand. This would offer nothing over the GTR.
    Im already considering leaving the brand but it does offer one thing over the gtr and that is rwd

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    18
    Rep Points
    15.0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    There is a RWD mode on the 2012 model, and you can remove the AWD components to save weight.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    516
    Rep Points
    124.3
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    check out the side profile of the hood. sure looks like like short, rearward positioned v6 to me. and, i don't see an i6 fitting.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The only rival to outgun the e92 m3 with dct was the p31 c63 that came out later. The m3 dynos just under a c63 but weighs less, not gunned at all. Next gen is shaping up badly.
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 654 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    e92 M3 was outgunned by C63 AMG in horsepower and especially torque. Who cares. Big engine is heavy, requires heavy transmission and M3 outgunned Merc in most of the tracks. Bmw is a lot more agile. The new M5 runs circles around Mercs with more power. The new M3 will do the same for C63 AMG. Bmw is the ultimate driving machine. Merc is power without control in comparison.
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Only on paper not in practice.

    That's my point! @Sticky, you are already $#@!ing about the rumored stats but the new M3/M4 will probably be down in HP to the C class AMG the same amount it is now so whats the big deal? We already know the F8x M3 will be lighter than the e9x M3 based on the regular 3 series. Even more so since it will be going from the V8 to the new V6tt. I bet it will be in the 150 to 200lb range.

    I do like the looks/shape of this new M3, looks like it has 1M sized fender flares, hopefully they carry it over to the coupe.
    ​#Chuckstrong

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,523
    Rep Points
    1,937.8
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    20


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The e92 M3 is/was also outgunned by it's rivals. The S65 is awesome but you have to admit the 414hp and 295lb/ft is pretty much weaksauce.


    But you are right, it would be nice if they would surprise us and throw a detuned version of the M5 motor....

    Weaksauce... I like that. Click here to enlarge

    It's the 295 ft/lbs across a range of 6,500 revs - this is what makes it quick. Same with an F1 car, torque created through gearing - power created through an insane operating range.

    This is a proven formula (no pun intended) - it works man. Click here to enlarge

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by inlineS54B32 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Weaksauce... I like that. Click here to enlarge

    It's the 295 ft/lbs across a range of 6,500 revs - this is what makes it quick. Same with an F1 car, torque created through gearing - power created through an insane operating range.

    This is a proven formula (no pun intended) - it works man. Click here to enlarge
    I'm not putting the car down, I'm saying that the M3 was down in HP/torques compared to the C63 before and will be again. I don't know why everyone is so surprised about that....
    ​#Chuckstrong

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,523
    Rep Points
    1,937.8
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    20


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm not putting the car down, I'm saying that the M3 was down in HP/torques compared to the C63 before and will be again. I don't know why everyone is so surprised about that....
    It's just that I wish we somehow had a way to measure total are underneath to power curve as opposed to peak power/torque - the average is what makes the car fast or slow. Until that happens, we have to wait for videos/1/4 mile times, word of mouth etc...

    I really like the 1M -- there are 2 guys in Chicago that have them - one black one orange, and it's a VERY attractive car (to me - both in sexiness, and performance) - but I really think BMW could have done better... They stuff a turbo to create torque across a small RPM range - and call it a day. What happened to the "real" M series? I would give up almost nothing to get an S65 BLOWN from the factory - making 400 ft-lbs from 1000-8400 RPM - but it won't happen anytime soon... Until it does, I am sticking with "they should stick with NA until they have it 100% figured out".

    Cheers.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by inlineS54B32 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's just that I wish we somehow had a way to measure total are underneath to power curve as opposed to peak power/torque - the average is what makes the car fast or slow. Until that happens, we have to wait for videos/1/4 mile times, word of mouth etc...

    I really like the 1M -- there are 2 guys in Chicago that have them - one black one orange, and it's a VERY attractive car (to me - both in sexiness, and performance) - but I really think BMW could have done better... They stuff a turbo to create torque across a small RPM range - and call it a day. What happened to the "real" M series? I would give up almost nothing to get an S65 BLOWN from the factory - making 400 ft-lbs from 1000-8400 RPM - but it won't happen anytime soon... Until it does, I am sticking with "they should stick with NA until they have it 100% figured out".

    Cheers.
    I guess that died with the e46 M3..you know, before that 4000 lb tank called the e92 came out.Click here to enlarge I kid...or do I?Click here to enlarge
    ​#Chuckstrong

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    516
    Rep Points
    124.3
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    f1 cars make 220lbft (gasp! they must not be very quick!), assuming 750hp at 18k rpm

    you guys know highest avg power wins, right? right?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by black bnr32 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    f1 cars make 220lbft (gasp! they must not be very quick!), assuming 750hp at 18k rpm

    you guys know highest avg power wins, right? right?
    What's that have to do with the price of eggs in China?
    ​#Chuckstrong

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    516
    Rep Points
    124.3
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by KB Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    295lb/ft is pretty much weaksauce.
    mostly arguing against this

    edit: and the 414hp

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by black bnr32 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    mostly arguing against this

    edit: and the 414hp
    Yeah, I should have worded that a little differently but got distracted...I was at work.
    ​#Chuckstrong

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,523
    Rep Points
    1,937.8
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    20


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    @KB, the point that it died is what sucked... Imagine a low boost s54b32 - we have seen what this thing does at a single BAR, let's leave at .5 BAR for "safety" - we would still have that awesome torque curve to 8150 AND another 200 horsepower (guessing) to boot. I am not trying to argue here - just saying, I think they could have done better than tuning a 135i and calling it a day/hoping people don't notice.

    Cheers.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    279
    Rep Points
    146.2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Calm down. Like BMW is going to bring some bullsh_t to market (F07 GT not included)! It is a new M3, look at the fender flares. If you can't get excited about that and the power that it implies then you are not tuned in at all. Give them credit. They will not mess up the M3. And BMW is trying to work with the current and future emissions just like everyone else. V6 is not going to happen. Just like BMW is not going to ditch the 3 Series for the 4 Series which is for a lineup priced above the 3 Series and allows them to enter new niches for them.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Points
    903.7
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by deemo319 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Calm down. Like BMW is going to bring some bullsh_t to market (F07 GT not included)! It is a new M3, look at the fender flares. If you can't get excited about that and the power that it implies then you are not tuned in at all. Give them credit. They will not mess up the M3. And BMW is trying to work with the current and future emissions just like everyone else. V6 is not going to happen. Just like BMW is not going to ditch the 3 Series for the 4 Series which is for a lineup priced above the 3 Series and allows them to enter new niches for them.
    I agree...The next M3 will destroy the e9x just like the e9x destroys the e46m. There is always going to be people that hate the new model. I remember when the spyshots for the e9x were coming out and the rumors about the v8 and how everyone was saying the e46 was the last of the true M cars...now it is e9x people saying they own the last of the true M cars...happen every generation.
    ​#Chuckstrong

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,888
    Rep Points
    1,406.4
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 654 Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The new M5 runs circles around Mercs with more power.
    Nope, it is a pig.


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •