Close

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    2,342
    Rep Points
    768.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Maybe once my car is set a ready to get beat on said "driver" lol can try my hpf2.5

    it's the phoenix yellow car that lives in your shop. Not sure we met mike. Was it you I was talking to about forums when I brought my car in.

    DERAIL

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    19145
    Posts
    597
    Rep Points
    2,150.3
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Thanks guys. Again, this 'record' will fall.

    Batta: Yea, I'm the pale bald dude. Nice to meet ya!

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    880
    Rep Points
    594.0
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Maybe kind of, but regardless I don't intend to play with low boost or with 10's.
    you dont plan to play with 10's? a stage 3 will be a constisten 9 second car?

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,202
    Rep Points
    31,315.4
    Mentioned
    2056 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    314


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ERM324 Click here to enlarge
    you dont plan to play with 10's? a stage 3 will be a constisten 9 second car?
    Not all the stage 3's.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    1,591
    Rep Points
    2,215.1
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    23


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Ya me too, I thought I had one.
    Lmao, yeah I thought you had one too Click here to enlarge
    2006 AW/Black ZCP 6MT


    Click here to enlarge


    E46 M3 Owners of the World <---- Join the FB group!!


    Instagram :: @NotSMG.M3

    Click here to enlarge

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,676
    Rep Points
    3,291.4
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    3) 10.690* 129.380 6.896 103.830 1.633 BMW M3 E92 VF620 2008 VAC Motorsports
    4) 10.870* 131.400 7.130 103.400 1.830 BMW M3 E92 2009 Mike Wadsworth
    How did VAC manage this trap/time with a similarly sized setup/boost as Mike's car which ran another 100shot of NOS on top of the ESS-600 kit? Both cars are DCT and both cars had close 60' times and very close trap speeds both 1/8th and 1/4...Is the VF-620 kit really that much better that it can take on an similarly sized ESS kit that also had a 100shot of NOS and beat it?? I don't get it..

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by dzenno Click here to enlarge
    3) 10.690* 129.380 6.896 103.830 1.633 BMW M3 E92 VF620 2008 VAC Motorsports
    4) 10.870* 131.400 7.130 103.400 1.830 BMW M3 E92 2009 Mike Wadsworth

    How did VAC manage this trap/time with a similarly sized setup/boost as Mike's car which ran another 100shot of NOS on top of the ESS-600 kit? Both cars are DCT and both cars had close 60' times and very close trap speeds both 1/8th and 1/4...Is the VF-620 kit really that much better that it can take on an similarly sized ESS kit that also had a 100shot of NOS and beat it?? I don't get it..
    its because ESS kits are doo-doo. that was 5.5 psi on the ESS kit. i had the dyno somewhere, and WITH the 100 shot, it was about 560rwhp.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,202
    Rep Points
    31,315.4
    Mentioned
    2056 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    314


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by dzenno Click here to enlarge
    3) 10.690* 129.380 6.896 103.830 1.633 BMW M3 E92 VF620 2008 VAC Motorsports
    4) 10.870* 131.400 7.130 103.400 1.830 BMW M3 E92 2009 Mike Wadsworth
    How did VAC manage this trap/time with a similarly sized setup/boost as Mike's car which ran another 100shot of NOS on top of the ESS-600 kit? Both cars are DCT and both cars had close 60' times and very close trap speeds both 1/8th and 1/4...Is the VF-620 kit really that much better that it can take on an similarly sized ESS kit that also had a 100shot of NOS and beat it?? I don't get it..
    Because his car with nitrous was putting out power close to this one. Makes the boost only runs look all the more impressive Click here to enlarge

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Sorry to go OT VAC.

    but @dzenno here is the info on previous record holder http://www.bimmerboost.com/showthrea...Vs-RB-335-Dyno

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,676
    Rep Points
    3,291.4
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    its because ESS kits are doo-doo. that was 5.5 psi on the ESS kit. i had the dyno somewhere, and WITH the 100 shot, it was about 560rwhp.
    just want to point out that I'm not in any way doubting legitimacy of VAC's or Mike's numbers here at all...i'm just trying to understand the differences in the setups...

    LM, on dragtimes where I got that table from, Mike indicated he was running the VT-600 kit for his 10.8 run w/ the 100nos shot and 7.5psi boost...not the vt-575 which runs 5.5psi...take a look at the details on the slip on dragtimes

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,202
    Rep Points
    31,315.4
    Mentioned
    2056 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    314


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by dzenno Click here to enlarge
    just want to point out that I'm not in any way doubting legitimacy of VAC's or Mike's numbers here at all...i'm just trying to understand the differences in the setups...

    LM, on dragtimes where I got that table from, Mike indicated he was running the VT-600 kit for his 10.8 run w/ the 100nos shot and 7.5psi boost...not the vt-575 which runs 5.5psi...take a look at the details on the slip on dragtimes
    The details on his runs are all here. He was running the 575 kit with nitrous and then maybe changed it who knows with the old pulley. Either way, his dyno numbers with nitrous were less than mine on boost alone, think about that.

    Also, 130 has been cracked boost only which shows you it can be done.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,676
    Rep Points
    3,291.4
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    ok, i didn't know that..i went by what he has on dragtimes...

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I don't doubt VAC at all since I'm a customer. There was a lot of pulley swaps and missed info during that time. Congrats to VAC again though

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •