Type: Posts; User: tron
Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.
10-04-2010, 06:51 PM
Have new photos been released What do you see that now makes you certain its more than the plugs? What does your 180 stem from? You were pretty certain the plugs (or "knock") were the issue in the...
10-04-2010, 03:00 PM
I would agree that an E46 can do almost anything as well as an E36 if not better, when disregarding cost. Its a newer platform and the S54 is a better *better* engine than than a S50/52.
10-03-2010, 10:39 AM
You tell me, o haloed one.
You set the precedence.
10-03-2010, 10:37 AM
Please attach dyno. I would also like to know what you consider reliable, as you had a decent amount of HG issues IIRC.
I really would rather not make this a pissing match. Back on bfc you...
10-02-2010, 10:00 PM
Taza seems to harbor some unknown resentment for you.
Don't bring up E36 or older platforms around here. Power to weight ratio, reliable power, torque, etc don't apply to...
10-02-2010, 09:44 PM
A new and well known member over here from bfc.
But he is only here because of the drama.
Is Milkt on to something?
08-02-2010, 07:31 PM
M50/52 + S50/52: I would never take a dime from you milkt. ...
I would never take a dime from you milkt.
Just a TS, on the house.
08-02-2010, 07:14 PM
M50/52 + S50/52: I havent seen a for sale thread for that TS. ...
I havent seen a for sale thread for that TS.
Cool project Bob.
Keep us updated.
M50/52 + S50/52: No, that was not the consensus nor was it my...
No, that was not the consensus nor was it my opinion. It was yours and Taza's.
And we were debating the general idea that low 500whp E36's can trap mid to high 120's. I dont debate specifics,...
Its a non M engine.
You know this braaaaaahhh.
M50/52 + S50/52: I agree. You just didn't think they were capable...
I agree. You just didn't think they were capable of trapping these numbers.
06-13-2010, 10:52 AM
M50/52 + S50/52: Yes. No, its not about knife edging the crank...
No, its not about knife edging the crank and balance/blueprinting it. Ask Mike his opinion.
I have read about it before, but it was a couple years ago. Its interesting, but I don't...
A.) This thread is awesome. I don't know why it took me so long to click on it.
B.) Top right please.
06-11-2010, 02:40 PM
M50/52 + S50/52: But they have been proven to handle 500-550whp...
But they have been proven to handle 500-550whp for a long period of time.
Semantics are semantics. The point was OEM parts aren't "rated" for aftermarket usage.
06-11-2010, 10:04 AM
06-11-2010, 10:03 AM
M50/52 + S50/52: Pretty sure manufacturers don't specify "ratings"...
Pretty sure manufacturers don't specify "ratings" on parts. They produce them to X specification and within Y threshold depending on what that part is used for. We then do whatever we do when...
M50/52 + S50/52: 1500 iirc.
06-11-2010, 09:17 AM
M50/52 + S50/52: Search on bfc... there was a thread in the track...
Search on bfc... there was a thread in the track section on it last week, and there is more information in that part of the forum than F/I.
If I can find it I will edit this post with the thread. ...
What company are you recommending?
0w40 is still a decent oil. I can guarantee that it is fine for my non track car. I have no need for a higher weight oil in a E36 either.
06-10-2010, 03:30 PM
GG is too busy teaching everyone to tune to notice the output of the dyno.
I quoted you to respond to your mention on the cams, and figured that other comment would find its...
06-10-2010, 03:26 PM
I think this belongs in OT buddy.
This weekend I plan on sleeping so I can get over my hang overs from 3 straight nights of drinking.
06-10-2010, 03:25 PM
M50/52 + S50/52: Well, you asked about the crank, and he said...
Well, you asked about the crank, and he said secret bavsol stuff, which I understand.
But that doesn't answer why Cam would get solid lifters without any work done to his crank to improve the...
M50/52 + S50/52: 38 lbs actually. These numbers are making...
38 lbs actually.
These numbers are making sticky eat his words about the GT35r E36's.