Close

    • Deflating an F10 M5 owner's ego - Weistec Stage III superchargerd C63 AMG Black Series smacks down an F10 M5

      This is a pretty telling video. Warning, it gets ugly for the M5. So if you are an F10 M5 owner perhaps you should just go on M5board instead and have Gustav pat you on your back and tell you that you have the fastest sedan in the world and that everything will be fine. It's amazing how lopsided this race is considering the F10 M5 dynos in the low 500 wheel horsepower range stock but that does not help mask its simply big fat 4300+ pound butt.

      The C63 AMG Black Series has the Weistec Stage III 3.0 liter blower with 11 psi of boost producing somewhere in the 650 wheel horsepower range. The F10 M5 is stock and well, that shows. Maybe stock M5's are faster in Sweden? Enjoy the video.




      This article was originally published in forum thread: Anal Raping Of An F10:M5 By A Weistec C 63 Black Series WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT started by JRCART View original post
      Comments 426 Comments
      1. seth's Avatar
        seth -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Inconspicuous Click here to enlarge
        I certainly wasn't under the illusion that I invented the idea, but I am in full agreement. A small but loyal subset of the population would indeed be enthralled by the concept. Whether or not BMW would be better off financially in the short or long term as a result is, well, moot. (Yeah, I went there.)
        Attachment 27464
      1. Inconspicuous's Avatar
        Inconspicuous -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JRCART Click here to enlarge
        I feel your pain brother.
        Click here to enlarge
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Inconspicuous Click here to enlarge
        I certainly wasn't under the illusion that I invented the idea, but I am in full agreement. A small but loyal subset of the population would indeed be enthralled by the concept. Whether or not BMW would be better off financially in the short or long term as a result is, well, moot. (Yeah, I went there.)
        Winemakers re-release acclaimed vintages.

        Shoemakers re-release classic designs.

        BMW themselves is doing EXACTLY this with an upcoming motorcycle: http://www.bimmerboost.com/content.p...th-automobiles

        So why not a car?
      1. SleepersOwn's Avatar
        SleepersOwn -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by seth Click here to enlarge

        And why do people not call apples, oranges? Because it's an incorrect description of what you are talking about. If moot was used in one way and if people started using it as the opposite, whether mistakenly or just from being uneducated to its meaning, it doesn't mean that at some point people weren't wrong in it's usage. If at one point they were incorrect, then why now is it accepted? Because people are misinformed, don't know where the word came from and don't bother to find or nor care.

        Does this mean the Crossfire guys who all badge their cars as AMG's will one day be accepted as that too now?
        If i'm understanding correctly, your basic point seemed fitting. Which is why you threw out the " Grammar Nazi " and couch emoticon to show you were really just being a stickler from force of habit. I do find your points valid but, a bit overboard with your examples. I doubt anyone would use orange for apple as they're too close in proximity for understanding. Why call a fruit another type of fruit ? Sure someone COULD do it but, I just highly doutb they would. It creates more confusion which basically defeats the purpose.

        Here's my question as i'm genuinely interested ....

        As for being wrong for a proper usage, wouldn't that be determined by the agreed social understanding of the word ? If " Moot " meant " xyz " in the 1700's but, it means " abc " now, does that really mean it's " abc " usage today is actually wrong ? I guess i'm leaning on what Inconspicuous is saying in that, how can it be wrong if it's intention is understood ?

        For some reason I found your debate rather interesting lol.
      1. Inconspicuous's Avatar
        Inconspicuous -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by seth Click here to enlarge
        Does this mean the Crossfire guys who all badge their cars as AMG's will one day be accepted as that too now?
        Frankly, I could give a damn (see what I did there) what other people do with their cars. I don't have time to fritter away on such frivolous matters. I'm far too busy with important things like arguing about grammar on the Internet.
      1. seth's Avatar
        seth -
        Well considering this issue has taken up roughly 1/5th or 1/6th of your total post count I'd beg to differ but no need to debate the debate so carry on.
      1. CubanJJ09's Avatar
        CubanJJ09 -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by seth Click here to enlarge
        Well considering this issue has taken up roughly 1/5th or 1/6th of your total post count I'd beg to differ but no need to debate the debate so carry on.
        Attachment 27476
      1. Inconspicuous's Avatar
        Inconspicuous -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by SleepersOwn Click here to enlarge
        As for being wrong for a proper usage, wouldn't that be determined by the agreed social understanding of the word ? If " Moot " meant " xyz " in the 1700's but, it means " abc " now, does that really mean it's " abc " usage today is actually wrong ? I guess i'm leaning on what Inconspicuous is saying in that, how can it be wrong if it's intention is understood ?
        This is pretty much what I'm getting at. When you break it all the way down, language is a series of words, and words are symbols. What matters is the idea that they represent, and whether that's getting across. The symbols are, both in theory and practice, interchangeable. Shakespeare was right about roses.

        BTW, you realize that by signaling your appreciation for the debate and egging us on, you're now culpable as an enabler, right? When they come with the pitchforks and torches, you're going down with us.
      1. Inconspicuous's Avatar
        Inconspicuous -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by seth Click here to enlarge
        Well considering this issue has taken up roughly 1/5th or 1/6th of your total post count I'd beg to differ but no need to debate the debate so carry on.
        Don't get me wrong. Every time I see someone spell the word "lose" with more than one O, I die a little inside. Is that worse than when things are "for all intensive purposes?" You tell me. I try not to think about it too much.
      1. M3_WC's Avatar
        M3_WC -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Inconspicuous Click here to enlarge
        Wouldn't it be great if cars were like sneakers, and you could get a factory perfect replica of your favorite classic models? I'm not sure I would buy Nikes at all if I couldn't get a brand new example of a shoe designed in the mid-80s. So why not a reissue of the E30 M3, E39 M5, W202 C55, R129 SL73, etc.?

        No need to point out the litany of reasons this will never happen, a guy can dream right? In a perfect world...
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
        I said this earlier. They should periodically have library releases. BMW should buy something like 30 E30 M3's and factory restore them with modern parts and put in some of the more modern M motors then re-release. People would EAT THAT UP.
        Worth a watch.


      1. seth's Avatar
        seth -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by CubanJJ09 Click here to enlarge
        zactly
      1. seth's Avatar
        seth -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Inconspicuous Click here to enlarge
        Don't get me wrong. Every time I see someone spell the word "lose" with more than one O, I die a little inside. Is that worse than when things are "for all intensive purposes?" You tell me. I try not to think about it too much.
        I suppose I have much less self control in this respect. Maybe it's just me displacing my grammar/language scoldings in my home life upon others in the digital realm to release stress.
      1. Black Sheep's Avatar
        Black Sheep -
        Let's get back to anal raping
      1. Inconspicuous's Avatar
        Inconspicuous -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by M3_WC Click here to enlarge
        Worth a watch.
        Thanks, that was a treat. Now all I need is a suitcase full of money.
      1. seth's Avatar
        seth -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Black Sheep Click here to enlarge
        Let's get back to anal raping
        your car is slow, show me your pink
      1. Black Sheep's Avatar
        Black Sheep -
        Click here to enlarge Attachment 27490
      1. seth's Avatar
        seth -
        Probably pretty close to what it looks like
      1. nafoo's Avatar
        nafoo -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Black Sheep Click here to enlarge
        Mmmmmm, I want some grapefruit.
      1. teamben158's Avatar
        teamben158 -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Black Sheep Click here to enlarge
        Let's get back to anal raping
        Click here to enlarge
      1. M3_WC's Avatar
        M3_WC -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JRCART Click here to enlarge
        The name JRCART and Weistec was mentioned and just like that we had thre cars registered....I am not kidding


        So what are the odds your car is ready......deja vu
        @JRCART Is the wing easily removable on the BS? SportAuto measured the no aero C63 PP is faster by 17km/h compared to the BS on the Döttinger Höhe of the Nürburgring.