Watch a 1500 horsepower Undergroung Racing twin turbo Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera destroy a 1000+ horsepower turbo E46 M3

Originally Posted by ZooyorQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=SqCG6R0trfo

Wow, that thing hit Ludicrous Speed.

Originally Posted by ZooyorQ

Video

Holy $#@!, you weren't kidding man.

I could not see the Lamborghini anymore!

The E46 M3 in the video below is a very, very fast car capable of over 900 wheel horsepower. The vehicle belongs to BimmerBoost member Zooyorq and is by any stretch of the imagination a stupid fast car. The problem is it ran into an even more stupidly fast car. In the defense of the M3, the Gallardo gets a huge jump and the M3's power was dialed down a bit to the 700+ wheel range due to traction issues.

Additionally, the M3 was on a low octane map due to running 50% E85 fuel at the time. Even with a low octane map and poor traction a turbo built motor E46 M3 will destroy 99.9% of cars out there. This just goes to show what happens when you run into something on a whole different level of fast that is able to put its power down.

I think I saw that lambo at tx2k12. If it's the same car, that thing is stupid fast.

The lambo just... disappeared.

That wasn't a race... Money straight up disappeared into the distance.

I wish BMW had an AWD M Car.. would love to mod one up in similar fashion.. horsepower is just far exceeding what rwd is capable of.. even on cars with 345's out back.

Originally Posted by ZooyorQ

I wish BMW had an AWD M Car.. would love to mod one up in similar fashion.. horsepower is just far exceeding what rwd is capable of.. even on cars with 345's out back.

Longer gears and boost by gear...

Pointless race...
anyways, what does a Lamborghini like that do 60-130 in?

Originally Posted by SexiPYm3

Pointless race...
anyways, what does a Lamborghini like that do 60-130 in?

Why pointless? Race is a race, I'd run it too even I were to get killed.

60-130 in 3.x or under.

Originally Posted by Sticky

Why pointless? Race is a race, I'd run it too even I were to get killed.

60-130 in 3.x or under.

Whats the 60-130 of the m3 turbo on that very run?

I think its 60-130 is 5,6 to 6,0 s.

Sticky dont argue again, it was a race / test and m3 had vbox mounted on the windscreen.

Originally Posted by ZooyorQ

I wish BMW had an AWD M Car.. would love to mod one up in similar fashion.. horsepower is just far exceeding what rwd is capable of.. even on cars with 345's out back.

Even though GTT was faster it should be a very exciting race.

Congradulations and dont back OFF.

You dont need AWD. E46 M3 hooks good if it is set up to hook. Remember my 60-130 was 4,23 s 15 months ago.

There are techniques to hook better. I ll be hitting 3.xx 60-130 times soon.

What was your 60-130 on this race?

Originally Posted by Twinturbom3

Whats the 60-130 of the m3 turbo on that very run?

I think its 60-130 is 5,6 to 6,0 s.

Sticky dont argue again, it was a race / test and m3 had vbox mounted on the windscreen.

The $#@! you babbling about? It isn't about who wins or loses always or setting a record 60-130.

Zooyorq isn't about to commit ritual suicide like you would be.

Don't argue again? Wow.

Originally Posted by Twinturbom3

Even though GTT was faster it should be a very exciting race.

Congradulations and dont back OFF.

You dont need AWD. E46 M3 hooks good if it is set up to hook. Remember my 60-130 was 4,23 s 15 months ago.

There are techniques to hook better. I ll be hitting 3.xx 60-130 times soon.

What was your 60-130 on this race?

Originally Posted by Sticky

Why pointless? Race is a race, I'd run it too even I were to get killed.

60-130 in 3.x or under.

lol, I guess. That wasn't even a race.

Originally Posted by SexiPYm3

lol, I guess. That wasn't even a race.

It goes to show how fast the Gallardo is...

stupid fast

I got to start saving my pennies. Those UGR cars are phenomenal. Kit is phenomenally priced too.