Weistec CLK63 AMG Black Series supercharger results from BenzBoost member Ecampbell - 551 rwhp

That is awesome result. should give the naysayers plenty to think about. The installation on my Black Series is continuing. I have a completley stock car which we did a before dyno on prior to install and will do an after dyno as well to show the gains on a stock car.

Originally Posted by Maverick1975

That is awesome result. should give the naysayers plenty to think about. The installation on my Black Series is continuing. I have a completley stock car which we did a before dyno on prior to install and will do an after dyno as well to show the gains on a stock car.

Be sure to toss me the before and after graphs when it's done. Really want to see the numbers on a stock car other than the SC.

Maverick,

It wil be interesting to see the difference you pick up as my car was never on the dyno in stock configuration.

bond/throttle and others, now would be a perfect time to say....sorry..... thus completing the circle that every claim made by me and others on my build has made has been proven....

In the end I asked to put it up as I could see your side.....you will now see I have a bunch of crow off the barb served up for some people! Perhaps we can now start being positive...

Nice graph!

I understand your hesitance to post info but this whole mess could have been avoided
by just posting this graph a week ago. Some of these guys are like sharks when they
sense blood in the water. They hear claims on the internet all the time and while I
respect your wishes, I can't say I blame them for wanting proof.

Anyway, congrats. That is an impressive number with low boost on 91 octane.

Originally Posted by PetroC63

Nice graph!

I understand your hesitance to post info but this whole mess could have been avoided
by just posting this graph a week ago.

DING DING DING!!!

Originally Posted by ecampbell

bond/throttle and others, now would be a perfect time to say....sorry..... thus completing the circle that every claim made by me and others on my build has made has been proven....

In the end I asked to put it up as I could see your side.....you will now see I have a bunch of crow off the barb served up for some people! Perhaps we can now start being positive...

Thanks for the chart
Do you have any plans to take the car to the dragstrip?

Originally Posted by PetroC63

I understand your hesitance to post info but this whole mess could have been avoided
by just posting this graph a week ago.

OR if members were a bit more positive.

Originally Posted by Full Throttle

DING DING DING!!!

The only bell getting rung here is YOURS.

"I understand your hesitance to post info but this whole mess could have been avoided
by just posting this graph a week ago."

We all agree on the above referenced post and wanted Earl to share his dyno info ^ ....Yet you took it a bit further and doubted his claims - essentially calling him a liar unless he posted a dyno graph proving it. Well, he's now done so and you look a complete douche. I asked you in the previous thread what you would do if/when he posted the graph proving his claims and you avoided the question. Well, I guess we have our answer because it's clear that even when you are proven wrong, you don't have the integrity to own up to it and apologize. Pathetic...

Nice numbers on the dyno ecampbell.... thanks for sharing

By the way, I do agree that Full Throttle was a bit too aggressive with his posts. Lets step it down a notch with the attacks so this place doesn't turn into a dump.

Originally Posted by Exeenom

Nice numbers on the dyno ecampbell.... thanks for sharing

By the way, I do agree that Full Throttle was a bit too aggressive with his posts. Lets step it down a notch with the attacks so this place doesn't turn into a dump.

Nice numbers indeed....especially under the curve. Thanks for sharing, Earl.

Not sure if that last part about "attacks" was directed at me...but it wasn't really an attack and it was justified and well deserved IMO. This is one of the main reasons why I am here - to call people out for being idiots without the fear of being banned and/or suspended for speaking my mind.

Originally Posted by LZH

Nice numbers indeed....especially under the curve. Thanks for sharing, Earl.

Not sure if that last part about "attacks" was directed at me...but it wasn't really an attack and it was justified and well deserved IMO. This is one of the main reasons why I am here - to call people out for being idiots without the fear of being banned and/or suspended for speaking my mind.

Feel free.

Originally Posted by LZH

The only bell getting rung here is YOURS.

"I understand your hesitance to post info but this whole mess could have been avoided
by just posting this graph a week ago."

We all agree on the above referenced post and wanted Earl to share his dyno info ^ ....Yet you took it a bit further and doubted his claims - essentially calling him a liar unless he posted a dyno graph proving it. Well, he's now done so and you look a complete douche. I asked you in the previous thread what you would do if/when he posted the graph proving his claims and you avoided the question. Well, I guess we have our answer because it's clear that even when you are proven wrong, you don't have the integrity to own up to it and apologize. Pathetic...

Just think had we not pressured him the info would not have been shared for everyone to benefit from. This is more exposure for Weistec maybe with more interest in their products and customers sharing their results they will make systems for other platforms. ill take that as a thank you and in response i say you're welcome.

Come on Weistec where is the K55 blower!!!! im ready to pull the trigger right now

Originally Posted by LZH

Nice numbers indeed....especially under the curve. Thanks for sharing, Earl.

Not sure if that last part about "attacks" was directed at me...but it wasn't really an attack and it was justified and well deserved IMO. This is one of the main reasons why I am here - to call people out for being idiots without the fear of being banned and/or suspended for speaking my mind.

Not at all.... I was agreeing with you about the nature of Full Throttle's posts in the other thread: I personally thought they were a little too aggressive towards ecampbell as well especially with the IP situation. And for the record, you would NOT get banned on here for speaking your mind nor for disagreeing with an admin or moderator. The ban system here is actually left in the hand of the members themselves . It would be nice though to minimize the aggressive posts towards new members so that they continue posting and not get discouraged from sharing their information.

Originally Posted by Full Throttle

Come on Weistec where is the K55 blower!!!! im ready to pull the trigger right now

Your car doesn't need any more power bro....

Originally Posted by Exeenom

Your car doesn't need any more power bro.... http://www.benzboost.com/images/smilies/scared/eek.gif

Maybe you're right we will see when i get this thing on a dyno jet after the 190mm pulley and re-tune, shes only making about 8psi now. im trying to catch Brooke's 180mph

Originally Posted by Exeenom

Not at all.... I was agreeing with you about the nature of Full Throttle's posts in the other thread: I personally thought they were a little too aggressive.

Agreed one of my many short comings

I was just looking at the 63 vs 55 head flow data stock and ported the 63 heads flow like CRAZY.

Originally Posted by Full Throttle

Just think had we not pressured him the info would not have been shared for everyone to benefit from. This is more exposure for Weistec maybe with more interest in their products and customers sharing their results they will make systems for other platforms. ill take that as a thank you and in response i say you're welcome.

Come on Weistec where is the K55 blower!!!! im ready to pull the trigger right now

Pressuring him to post for the benefit of the forum is one thing...but that's not all you did...and now instead of being man enough to admit your mistake, you try some dim witted diversionary tactic in an effort to lead us to believe that you were helping raise brand awareness for Weistec and further product development?? You certainly have an overinflated opinion of yourself and have yet to apologize for being proven wrong. I guess trying to change the topic works with other less intelligent audiences - but I really think you should reconsider your approach. You did nothing that would be deserving of any sort of gratitude from the members here.

Originally Posted by LZH

Pressuring him to post for the benefit of the forum is one thing...but that's not all you did...and now instead of being man enough to admit your mistake, you try some dim witted diversionary tactic in an effort to lead us to believe that you were helping raise brand awareness for Weistec and further product development?? You certainly have an overinflated opinion of yourself and have yet to apologize for being proven wrong. I guess trying to change the topic works with other less intelligent audiences - but I really think you should reconsider your approach. You did nothing that would be deserving of any sort of gratitude from the members here.

It's cool, it's over with, we all get carried away sometimes. The thing is, we can work through it and ultimately come to a resolution. That is difference here is that resolution is allowed to take place on the members own terms instead of just being silenced.

Group hug.