Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Last 30 Days Clear All
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 03:56 AM
    Welcome Jodssn6y, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 03:54 AM
    Sdfdflfa, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 03:48 AM
    Hey Sdfdfluf: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • rac's Avatar
    Today, 02:47 AM
    rac replied to a thread Track Day Setup and Discussion in N54
    i haven't had any cooling issues with the ppk gear. stock brakes were the first thing to suffer from heat for me.
    19 replies | 375 view(s)
  • Stucks's Avatar
    Today, 02:08 AM
    Nice numbers! So when you made 639whp, you had methanol? or did you have port injection then too? looks like timing took a little stumble on cyl 4. i have the same exact thing i noticed in my most recent logs from the other night, every cyl is perfect except 4, which is always a couple degrees down. :-/ also, i wonder how much backpressure the turbines are seeing....it wasnt long ago people thought the stock exhaust with stock secondary cats would be a gigantor restriction at 500whp lol. wonder if theres anyway to flow test the exhaust and see how it does lol
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 12:09 AM
    That's good enough. Ok, back to the topic please.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Today, 12:08 AM
    This is a little better. Prob the best it will get without the original file. Ill email you this one of you want to use it.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 12:07 AM
    I suggest cleaning it up and then it can be its own standalone article. Regardless, the overlays are great. Let's focus in this thread on this achievement. Perhaps discuss more what went into the tuning.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Today, 12:02 AM
    I will be much cleaner if I drop the gain back down, but then its hard to see the graphs, I have to photoshop that one, as I do not have the original DJ file. Let me try to make it a little cleaner for you
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 12:00 AM
    I like this and was going to put it in its own thread and article. That bottom graph really needs to be cleaned up for display purposes.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:59 PM
    Don't worry about him C. He is a known hater, you could have done 700WHP, and he would not have a nice word to say if you were running VTT products. I can not stress enough how damn impressive this is. Your own tuning, through friggin cats, and stock exhaust. We built the damn turbos, and you raising my expectations. I always had a random number of 679WHP in the back of my mind of what I thought max might be for 2+. I think we can see 700WHP out of these for sure. I overlaid your graph over a couple single graphs I had, and our own in house testing. The overlays are nothing short of stunning. That you can get this kind of power curve for under 4K is the best bargain in the N54 market. Overlay with our own results Overlay with VM 6465 Overlay with Motiv 750 at 23 and 27 psi
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:48 PM
    I know it's pretty crazy. It's temping to put our E92 back to stock frame rail turbos at these power levels.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Flinchy's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:46 PM
    >1. Total flow - The inlets flow about 10% more with filters added. The aeronautical engineer that did the testing had this to say about it – “Some interesting results with the filter on the pipes. I've seen similar with intercoolers when I connect the silicone hoses to the inlets, they end up flowing more than without the additional length. I suspect it has to do with the amount of turbulence that is generated near the inlet. In the case of your pipes the filter probably helps smooth the incoming airflow and you end up with more airflow than with the filter removed” I thought it was pretty well known that this is the case, since cone filters usually have an in built trumpet sorta shape I think what should be taken from this is that either solution will flow more than enough to max out any stock frame turbo, let alone existing ones... alternately... VTT rear inlet + MMP front = best combo for stock turbo inlets? lol
    19 replies | 487 view(s)
  • pobudz's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:36 PM
    It's a bit off topic, sure. Tried to inject humor to lighten the thread up :) Ghost, there is no doubt that these numbers are impressive and you're well on your way to the 700 club. Any plans to run at any upcoming events?
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Legionofboom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:33 PM
    This thread is going down hill!! Everyone lets be nice, BMW groups need to come together and stop being uncivil.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • GiveEmTheDD's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:33 PM
    Same---I tried a full catless system before, hated it
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:30 PM
    You actually make a point here. We aren't discussing that weak show with its weak attendees. We're talking about real achievement and real big power here. You know, something more important than roundel decals and painted trim that the crowd you referenced is into.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:29 PM
    It's a general comment about tone for the thread.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:27 PM
    What wasn't civil? I'm confused.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • pobudz's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:22 PM
    What negativity? Making fun of how everyone uses 'world record' like it means something? or the hoes at Bimmerfest? Neither have to do with you and your beast numbers man. Just because everyone else on this forum wants to piss all over everyone's parade doesn't mean I am.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:22 PM
    Just keep it civil people it's not hard. Very nice numbers. Nobody ever thought the stock frames would be able to do this let alone close in on cracking 7XX.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:20 PM
    For sure some of us just making fun of a certain individual that has yet to comment.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:19 PM
    Now my pursuit of making fun of certain users has made me look like a goldfish.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • The Ghost's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:19 PM
    :( I'm sorry you're bringing such negativity. I figured when the bar is moved by 40hp (on a dynojet, with logs, with mph), it was worth posting.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:15 PM
    I will have an article in the morning. I prefer one topic on this and to keep it nice and organized.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:14 PM
    Because I made a thread I can have control over to keep clean if the people I know are waiting in the wings to hate, peek out of the bushs. But feel free to front page the OP's. And let mine die
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:14 PM
    Threads merged.
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:12 PM
    Ok, excellent. Now why do we have two threads on this topic Tony?
    51 replies | 888 view(s)
More Activity