Activity Stream

Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Last 30 Days Clear All
  • Tzu's Avatar
    Today, 06:51 AM
    This is pathetic. Certainly won't be buying products from this retarded company.
    24 replies | 517 view(s)
  • xbox_fan's Avatar
    Today, 06:47 AM
    Since the US is a bit of a 3rd world country when it comes to mobile tech I'll be understanding here. But I assume if you check user agent from EMEA users you see that mobile is the new default browsing platform ;)
    10 replies | 374 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:42 AM
    Welcome PeterXSJI, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 37 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:30 AM
    What are you browsing from man? Iphone xbox_fan? Why do you guys browse from your phones anyway? It's a horrible experience for browsing anything.
    10 replies | 374 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 04:29 AM
    Hey LachlanJE: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 36 view(s)
  • xbox_fan's Avatar
    Today, 04:26 AM
    I have a hard time to see anything having higher prio than fixing this honestly...
    10 replies | 374 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:21 AM
    Now we're talking! The main problem BimmerBoost has with the i8 is that BMW went overboard in the efficiency department for a two-seat sports car (technically 2+2 but try to sit in the back) that costs over $130k. The i8 performs well and makes efficient use of its 357 horsepower and 420 lb-ft of torque. That is decent power but it just not cut it in the golden age of horsepower. Especially considering the ~3400 pound carbon tub i8 chassis is simply begging for more. Who is buying cars approaching $150k with options to save a few MPG anyway? The i8 potentially is capable of so much more. Its 1.5 liter three-cylinder turbo engine only produces 231 horsepower. Good for a 1.5 liter motor of course but imagine if BMW used their S55B30 inline-6 engine from the M3/M4 instead? Automobile reports that may be a possibility. The other possibility is a 320 horsepower 2.0 liter four-cylinder and considering that BMW does not have one of these sitting around the M division would have to develop one likely starting with the N20 engine as a base. Ok, fine, even a 320 horsepower 2.0 liter four-cylinder massaged by M is better than this 1.5 liter three-cylinder nonsense. The best bet and what BMW should do is the S55B30 3.0 liter inline-6 giving the car an underrated 554 horsepower and 590 lb-ft of torque. That is of course assuming no changes to the electric drivetrain. Really BMW should use a twin turbo S85 V10 for the gasoline motor but now we're dreaming and we'll be content with an i8 that finally has the performance to back up the looks. The four-cylinder although better than the three-cylinder just is not good enough for a proper M1 successor and a car to honor a hundred years of BMW. This is a one time one shot thing. Go big or go home. It's now or never. Ulrich Kranz who is the BMW i Senior Vice president is apparently pushing for this hotter i8 which will be called an i8S instead of an i8M. Keep in mind last year BMW stated i and M need to remain separate which is a steaming hot pile of you know what. Look, this M version of the i8 or higher performance i8 or whatever you want to call it has been reported off and on for years now. Automobile Magazine says it is coming but we have heard this before only for reports weeks later to state the opposite. Enough already. Someone at BMW confirm this thing and let BMW M go to town on the i8. In April of this year BimmerBoost made the case for a high performance i8. The conclusion is the same as before: It is time to build the Ultimate Driving Machine. It is now or never. Either you produce an enthusiast car or just admit you no longer build 'only one thing.' Build the i8 M or M1 as you have put your hardcore and loyal fans through enough and yet we are still here. If you do not, we won't be for much longer. Source
    2 replies | 8 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 03:22 AM
    I know this David. I'm fixing a lot of bugs and getting a lot of things behind the scenes done. I promise it will be fixed just give me time.
    95 replies | 3158 view(s)
  • DavidV's Avatar
    Today, 03:14 AM
    This is still not fixed. Warning: mysqli_query() function.mysqli-query]: (42S22/1054): Unknown column 'ln_other' in 'field list' in /includes/class_core.php on line 1391 Database error In General settings. when I uncheck the top 2 change Notification settings and click on SAVE this message still appears.
    95 replies | 3158 view(s)
  • wowprcc's Avatar
    Today, 03:12 AM
    wowprcc replied to a thread Load Target Offset (Overboost) in N54
    buraq can you post your 335is file to compare ? all of them please ;)
    43 replies | 2049 view(s)
  • BuraQ's Avatar
    Today, 02:47 AM
    BuraQ replied to a thread Load Target Offset (Overboost) in N54
    Because it came from COBB, Josh already looked into the ROM
    43 replies | 2049 view(s)
  • teddy's Avatar
    Today, 02:41 AM
    Thanks guys! sticky, awesome as always!:)
    30 replies | 899 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 02:38 AM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum hengsheng3Aj.
    0 replies | 33 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 02:15 AM
    Sticky replied to a thread 2008 535XI P2297 in N54
    You're probably onto something with the sensors.
    3 replies | 54 view(s)
  • Mannix's Avatar
    Today, 02:09 AM
    Mannix replied to a thread N55: N55 VANOS Bolt Recall in N55 and N52
    My 335i is at the dealer right now getting this update.
    33 replies | 756 view(s)
  • NniftyFour's Avatar
    Today, 02:06 AM
    Hey guys, Quick question/issue/quirk... I'm helping a friend tweak his Stg2+FMIC Agressive ST V4.02 map. He recently got new turbos (OEM) and ever since has been having some low end overboost issues. Nothing crazy and it clears up over 80ish load. Now by default in that map his wastegates default to approx ~30% DC as he first turns on the car, a few seconds after he pulls away the default off throttle position goes to 0.1% DC.... But when I make any change to the Pre-Control A table and flash, Even one .5 change the Default wastegate position stays at 30% DC. If you tap the pedal it will drop to 0.1% and go right back. Really weird behavior, I went back and forth a few times, surely I could modify any other table including WGDC Main and it would behave correctly. (30% then to 0% once you were moving) Whats up with this??? Edit: More info, FBO(FM,CP,DV,DP,DCI), Accessport V3, AccessTuner Race
    700 replies | 38822 view(s)
  • JoeBezy's Avatar
    Today, 02:03 AM
    JoeBezy replied to a thread 2008 535XI P2297 in N54
    Nope. Stock except for BMS DCI's. 114K miles right now. Just a bit frustrating. I plan on taking the O2 sensors out this weekend and seeing if they are dirty. Just a S#$t job.
    3 replies | 54 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:57 AM
    Ok so far so good. Keep em coming people.
    2 replies | 64 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Today, 01:51 AM
    Pic of the GPU's and a hilarious FC that I saw in traffic once.
    2 replies | 64 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:41 AM
    Kindly post attachments people.
    2 replies | 64 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 01:39 AM
    Welcome E46V, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 24 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:37 AM
    Bump, hey why not.
    1 replies | 82 view(s)
  • trebila's Avatar
    Today, 01:31 AM
    In the post you quote, I'm not talking about targets, I just wanted to say that running 12.8 AFR with E65 or above is much safer than with 93 pump gas, even with meth.
    110 replies | 2479 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:31 AM
    If I'm waiting for the next great thing I'll be waiting forever. Yep, 8 cores. I don't even care about gaming all the programs I use will fly with this computer. Right now my laptop with 16 gigs of ram isn't enough considering I have 96 browser windows open at the moment. Plus invoicing software. Plus my e-mail client. Plus a photo editor. Plus a video editor. Plus spotify. Plus an FTP client. Plus this, plus that, you get the point.
    8 replies | 163 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Today, 01:10 AM
    Yeah I know. I don't think this has two cpu's just 8 cores right? What I was getting at is some of the hype isn't worth it if you don't need the hardware. Some of the programs I was using wern't optimized well and I needed the hp. If it was me I would hold out until the top 8xx cards launch in the Q1 of 2015.
    8 replies | 163 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:09 AM
    Yeah not sure on the price but I also like the fact nobody I know will have one.
    8 replies | 163 view(s)
  • Zee's Avatar
    Today, 01:07 AM
    Just very expensive though. I love the design.
    8 replies | 163 view(s)
More Activity