Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Popular Clear All
  • Xearom3's Avatar
    04-28-2015, 02:21 PM
    So I figured I would share my experience with the community. Was out making a couple of pulls @ 25/26psi on my PTE 6466 twin scroll setup when cylinder 1 decided to give up on me. Not surprised a stock engine let go at mid to upper 600's, but I am impressed how long it hung in there. Put up a hell of a fight! Pics at the very bottom of my spare engine that apparently is now gonna get built. Log is from earlier in the evening: Also happened to have my GoPro watching the cluster:
    201 replies | 3411 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    04-10-2015, 10:26 AM
    Did a little messing around on the dyno last night on the crappiest of crap California 91 ACN gasoline, no meth. With a really conservative tune, we ended up with 585WHP / 500WTQ. Yes this is a new N54 91 WR, no we do not like putting it in all caps, red letters, and 75 font size, as honestly who is going to run this. We did this testing to satisfy the people who will inevitably ask about 91. For the tuning we literally ran 1 degree of timing at redline (yes that's ONE degree), sometimes less if it corrected. We could have pushed harder, but after every pull I found myself checking for lumpy idle, etc. This really isn't a good feeling, and the idea of breaking an expensive built motor to push any harder on 91 was decided against (there was more in there). As usual Dzenno made small changes, until we got where we wanted. This was running about 24-25 psi, and as I stated before, no timing. The 91 has been drained out of the car, and sacrificed to the power washer gods. We will continue on with some E85 testing...:paddle: I think you guys know the specs on the car but here they are: ABR built motor VTT Stage 3 VTX2867 Turbo kit VTT Shotgun Double Barrel PTF Twin Disc clutch ACN 91, no meth Tuning by Pro Tuning Freaks
    175 replies | 5627 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-28-2015, 03:33 PM
    The N54 3.0 liter turbocharged inline-6 is a strong BMW motor that takes boost (and abuse) well. That does not mean it is indestructible as nothing is. BimmerBoost member @Xearom3 unfortunately put a hole in his block but he shared what, how, and when it happened. Most people tend to sweep these things under the rug as if it is some sort of embarrassment or it reflects badly on them. Usually it is tuners as often something they did is responsible for the failure. This one appears to be old fashioned detonation and bad luck with the ECU not being able to spare the motor in time. So, he put a hole in the block but is taking it in stride sharing the details and he has a spare motor to build which will be able to take much more abuse. Hey, shit happens when pushing motors and running them hard at power/torque levels they were not designed for. Respect from BimmerBoost to @Xearom3 for sharing these photos and details: So I figured I would share my experience with the community. Was out making a couple of pulls @ 25/26psi on my PTE 6466 twin scroll setup when cylinder 1 decided to give up on me. Not surprised a stock engine let go at mid to upper 600's, but I am impressed how long it hung in there. Put up a hell of a fight! Pics at the very bottom of my spare engine that apparently is now gonna get built. Log is from earlier in the evening: Also happened to have my GoPro watching the cluster:
    201 replies | 2798 view(s)
  • Ofmalik's Avatar
    04-14-2015, 07:42 PM
    Ofmalik started a thread Want ST TURBO KIT ASAP in N54
    Looking for a ST kit, need ASAP. PM with whatever you've got new or used
    153 replies | 3083 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-09-2015, 09:34 PM
    I'm going to put something together as this is our 5 year anniversary and I just want to say thank you to all of you. The people who have helped, those that have not helped, whatever. I want to show this community is the best ups and downs or not. I can't guarantee I can do this all myself but I also can't count on others to get it done. If any one of you wonder why I prefer working alone it is for reasons like this. So, please, just list what you would like in an app. I'm considering making it so that it connects directly to our new (and coming shotly) downloads section so you can just select a map from the app and download it just like that. I'd love to give back (as apparently the original BB app, new servers, and new features aren't enough) so just tell me what you want to do and Ill let you know if it's feasible. Let's be productive and positive. So, thinking caps on people! :stripper:
    99 replies | 2213 view(s)
  • drfrink24's Avatar
    04-20-2015, 12:44 PM
    Doing a bit of research on turbo sizing, I know there are several factors that influence choices: Peak power goals @ xxxx RPM Fuel available etc... But lets face it, there are poor sized choices, such as a tiny AR that would choke the exhaust or a giant AR that would require 10k RPM and nitrous to hit peak numbers. To say that every turbo option is somehow the "best" for a specific outcome desired I think is misleading. I have to imagine that turbo A is better at accomplishing your goals than turbo B, and both are worse than turbo C (all else being equal). This isn't magic, its science, right? With our BSFC, VE, liters, VANOs, DI and other known factors, there should be a pretty obvious compressor and exhaust housing that offers a very meaty power band, assuming its tuned correctly with the correct fueling that works better than an under-sized or over-sized option, or even worse, with an under or oversized option poorly tuned.
    104 replies | 1889 view(s)
  • foe516's Avatar
    04-11-2015, 11:43 PM
    So now that we see all the gains to be had with inlets. Slicksilver hitting 500whp i wonder what we can expect with just a compressor upgrade like the VVT stage 1. i mean i really enjoy tracking my car so i would be happy with a 500-525 whp daily driver. it really doesn't even seem like you need stage 2 anymore to break 500. and these can be had fairly cheap. right now fbo with jb4 and bb e85 back end i hit 410whp/440tq. i couldn't even imagine another 20-25% more power. just looking to statr a discussion and get some ideas. thanks
    91 replies | 2176 view(s)
  • 4doorbmwpower's Avatar
    04-24-2015, 08:59 PM
    Can someone tell me more than just... its really hard? so is hacking into the pentagon and people still do it. WE PUT A MAN ON THE MOON! can we please find a company that can give us custom TCU flashing? I have emailed a company that does TCU flashing for Ferrari and Porsche, maybe they know a guy.
    88 replies | 2044 view(s)
  • Torgus's Avatar
    04-21-2015, 04:22 PM
    We have someone. His name is Leen. $1200 or less manifolds which will outflow the Motiv design they ripped off. Will be available for sale soon enough.
    70 replies | 2165 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-13-2015, 12:13 PM
    What a difference a different dynamometer can make. For forum bragging, there is no better dyno than the Dynojet. It is consistent and tends to produce the highest numbers which owners of course love to dyno race with. The Mustang being a load bearing and not an inertia based dyno functions differently and also provides different numbers. People get caught up in the numbers and attempting to explain that different machines can produce wildly different results even on the same car is often a lost cause. The average person will see figure X, see it is higher than figure Y, and leave it at that without delving any further into it. What you are about to see is just how much the numbers can vary and why dyno racing should be not be taken seriously. This 6-speed manual F10 M5 features the following modifications and was run on 93 octane pump fuel: - Undercover Performance 3 inch catless downpipes - Undercover Performance catless exhaust - BMS JB4 tuning Dynojet figures 620 lb-ft of torque and 659 whp: Mustang figures 553 lb-ft of torque and 544 whp: That is a spread of 115 horsepower at the wheels and 67 lb-ft of torque at the wheels on the exact same car with the only difference being different dyno machines. The output never changes. The way it is displayed to you is the only change. Does the Mustang deserve its reputation as being a conservative dyno in comparison to the Dynojet? It sure does. But do not get too caught up in its figures either. It can easily be messed with to display whatever the operator wants it to display. When used properly dynos are great tools. It's the tools running around with inflated graphs for frum bragging rights that one has to worry about.
    41 replies | 2313 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-21-2015, 12:47 AM
    This thread might get intense. So which one do you choose? Honestly, I'm starting to think the Viper is the way to go. I love the Z06. There is no 'wrong' car here. They're both incredible. But the Viper is just... raw. Something about it. There's something that makes you feel like they just won't build like this any longer. It's a tough one.
    54 replies | 1013 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-22-2015, 02:09 PM
    A twin turbo S85 V10? That is what the boosted BMW world has been missing. Well, at least in a street car. This is a bit of a premature post as there is a long way to go but our friend @Dr.Tamirlan from Russia shared some pictures and details on his build. You get a couple shots of the turbos mounted and the manifolds which are nice to see. BimmerBoost can say for the record they saw these manifolds almost two years ago in person so that gives you an idea of how long this process is. Additionally, BimmerBoost can say from experience that @Dr.Tamirlan better have a lot of patience and a lot of money. To do what he asks is going to take some serious work to the block. The power will be there with some big turbos and the V10, do not worry about that. Worry about keeping the motor together. BimmerBoost also from speaking with Gintani knows they have tricks up their sleeves for strengthening these blocks but the S85 is a better candidate than the S65 V8 for big power anyway due to its larger size, better oiling system, and offering slightly more material. The DCT swap is not as big of a wildcard here as people might think. Dodson is willing to work with Gintani regarding the transmission so they will be able to keep it together. The challenge once again is the block due to its soft and lightweight aluminum-silicon material. We wish our Russian friend luck with his project. The result certainly would be something to behold and it would challenge for the top street BMW spot in the world.
    37 replies | 1576 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    04-27-2015, 05:46 PM
    Had a chance to meet up with Payam today to tune his new PTE 6466 G2 twin scroll turbocharger. He's running our port injection and a full fuel-it kit (regulator & return line). 100% E85. Per usual I have a limited amount of time so I'll just share the highlights. 1) The 6466 G2 in a twin scroll works really well. Great boost potential and very good HP per PSI. 2) We found Payam's car wanted a lot less timing than I'm used to giving E85 cars. Around 7.5 degrees up top. 3) I tried a few VANOS curves and found the basic Cobb curves worked better than what we have in our ST back end flash files. Better spool and more power. Sigh. I think I'll just change those all back. 4) He ran in to timing drops around 30psi that we couldn't fix by lowering advance further so decided to call it a day for now. Hopefully it runs well at NFZ this weekend!
    44 replies | 1269 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    05-03-2015, 08:11 PM
    Rebellion Automotive is based out of the UK and The Turbo Engineers home is in Germany. It makes sense for these two to link up to provide a big turbo upgrade for the M133 motor. Rebellion Automotive already offers their Stage II turbo upgrade which utilizes a modified OEM housing. What does this upgrade entail? We don't really know as only this teaser photo stating TTE460-R is provided. We do know that Rebellion is now moving to flash tuning. Their previous turbo upgrade used their piggyback box but now with greater ECU control it looks like some more serious turbo upgrades are possible. The Turbo Engineers does some great work so we know the hardware side will be solid. Just take a look at their Audi 2.5 TFSI turbo upgrade work. If the 460 in the TTE upgrade is anything to go by it looks like 460 wheel horsepower should be the target here considering the Stage II Rebellion upgrade that we assume TTE did offers 401 wheel horsepower. Either way bigger turbos are coming to the M133 platform from multiple sources. The more competition, the better for AMG enthusiasts.
    57 replies | 558 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    04-27-2015, 05:54 PM
    Had a chance to meet up with Payam today to tune his new PTE 6466 G2 twin scroll turbocharger. He's running our port injection and a full fuel-it kit (regulator & return line). 100% E85. Per usual I have a limited amount of time so I'll just share the highlights. 1) The 6466 G2 in a twin scroll works really well. Great boost potential and very good HP per PSI. 2) We found Payam's car wanted a lot less timing than I'm used to giving E85 cars. Around 7.5 degrees up top. 3) I tried a few VANOS curves and found the basic Cobb curves worked better than what we have in our ST back end flash files. Better spool and more power. Sigh. I think I'll just change those all back. 4) He ran in to timing drops around 30psi that we couldn't fix by lowering advance further so decided to call it a day for now. Hopefully it runs well at NFZ this weekend!
    44 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-08-2015, 08:02 AM
    Mid 10 second stock internal supercharged E92 M3's are becoming more common as more owners take them to the strip. The record currently is 10.46 @ 135.13 but that is from a heavily stripped out car running in negative density altitude with some question marks regarding the fuel and boost used. Regardless, mid 10 second performance is about what one can expect on a well prepped strip from a supercharged DCT M3 pushing 8+ psi on drag rubber. This car ran 10.5 - 10.6 all day but in the process broke its driveshaft. Things break on the strip, that is how it is. The better prepped it is the better the chance is of something breaking as the torque has to go somewhere if the tires are hooking and not spinning. The 60 foots for the most part are in the 1.7X range which makes it somewhat surprising that the driveshaft gave as nobody else who has launched in this range has broken one. It could be a bad shaft or it could just be time for an upgrade to a DSS carbon unit. Based on the 60 foot it does not look like launch control (capable of 6200 rpm launches) was used. With a supercharger 1.5X-1.6X 60 foots should be possible as bolt on cars have done 1.7X's. The car was not pushed as hard as it could and should be out of hole. The car is running Dodson upgraded clutches and Dodson is the only company to have a real working solution for the BMW M3 DCT. The proof is in the 1/4 mile results. The claim is the car ran on 93 octane but when people claim pump it is best to assume race gas or some kind of octane boost (possibly from meth injection). If trying to set records why run pump gas unless you want to act like there is soooo much more in it? Undercover Performance prepped the car and plans to retune it. There will probably be more boost and some more octane with a more aggressive file if some of these things did not already take place. Regardless, mid 10's are essentially the norm now. There is room to hit low 10's. It's a shame more supercharged cars do not hit the strip but most M3 owners tend to be the kinds of people who are afraid of breaking things instead of pushing things. The runs were done at ATCO (one of the fastest East Coast strips) in negative density altitude up to -470 on.
    28 replies | 1922 view(s)
  • Mthis's Avatar
    04-12-2015, 10:30 AM
    Posting this on behalf of my good friend Mike. his m5s a beast and looks great as well. his mods are - Undercover 3inch down pipes with full catless Undercover exhaust with JB4 93oct. all work done by JC@ Champion Motorsports in NJ. So here it is the Comparison of Mustang and DynoJet Readings nothing was change in my car just basically doing a comparison Mustang Dyno read 553trq & 546whp Dynojet Dyno read 620trq & 659whp Crank - 760hp Trq- 716torque DynoJet Undercover Performance Mustang Dyno Tunning: https://youtu.be/Nh3HhoIKPk8
    41 replies | 431 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    04-30-2015, 06:30 PM
    Hey guys, Met up with a local enthusiast Ash today to tune his new VT2 turbos and inlets. He's also running 100% E85 using a full Fuel-IT system & port injection. He has our canned E85 back end flash. The turbos and fuel kit performed flawlessly with only minor tuning changes needed to dial in boost and the port injection. We decided 600whp was a good stopping point which was around 25psi. I have no doubt there is another 30-40whp in there when he wants it.
    32 replies | 1321 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-15-2015, 04:52 AM
    This is not a new story but the only way to combat ignorance is with knowledge and data. Fortunately, there are members in the BimmerBoost community who provide quality data such as what you are about to see below and thanks to them we can differentiate between marketing and reality. The marketing is that the F82 M3 as well as the F80 M3 weigh 3306 pounds. What BMW left out was this weight comes from a European spec F82/F80 (they have different crash test standard affecting whether seats with side impact airbags are used) that is a 6-speed manual without any fluids whatsoever. In other words, it's a bunch of BS. Almost exactly one year to the day BimmerBoost posted an indepently weighed figure for an F80 6-speed manual M3 and it came in at 3562 pounds: This year thanks to member @DD GT3 RD (who also weighed his 991 GTS while he has was it) we have an independent weight figure for an F82 M4 DCT and it is 3661 pounds: Does the DCT add weight? Yes. It is not almost 100 pounds though but the difference between the lighter 6-speed F80 M3 and the DCT F82 M4 can be attributed to the transmission as well as fuel. The rule of thumb for fuel is about 6 pounds per gallon of gas. So how do the F80 M3 and F82 M4 compare to a DCT E92 M3? The previous generation car comes in as lighter than either of them at 3549 pounds. Yes, turbochargers, intercoolers, and plumbing add weight so BMW's hype was nothing more than hype. The aluminum-silicon S65 V8 block in the E92 M3 is very light and compact and this also leads to the previous generation car having better weight distribution. Do not believe everything you read. Especially if it's marketing from BMW.
    23 replies | 2206 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-17-2015, 05:12 AM
    It is becoming increasingly apparent that the MKVII Volkswagen Golf R is an 11 second car with bolt ons. APR recently managed 12.011 @ 113.44 in the 1/4 mile out of the car with their Stage 1 tune on 93 octane and an intake. In other words, a hair from the 11's. Race gas alone would probably do it. With a 1.734 60 foot the all wheel drive system is showing its benefits off the line. It is just a matter of time before we see a US spec MKVII Golf R in the 11's and this just further reinforces the results from a US spec tuned Golf R we saw earlier this month. This is a new record though and 113.44 is the new fastest trap speed for US spec Golf R's once again. ROW cars are already in the 11's. With race gas these cars should be doing 11's and 115+ traps all day.
    38 replies | 557 view(s)
  • 93siro's Avatar
    04-20-2015, 12:46 AM
    93siro started a thread Building the engine in N54
    Hi all, So vac is going to build me a complete engine. Forged bottom end with their stage 3 head and custom spec cams. Im deciding now to whether go lower compression or up the compression ratio and go full insane? Also the cam profile is not decided yet. I know nobody has ever put cams on these engines, but all opinions are welcome. 264 with 10.2mm lift is too much? The turbos are vtt stage 2+. Thanks
    34 replies | 675 view(s)
  • Cpt_Rum-bo's Avatar
    04-30-2015, 05:10 PM
    Hey, Has anyone ever tried running a mix of E85 and 100 oct race gas? Specifically a mixture that results in 30% E85 and 100 oct race gas. Example a mix of 3 gallons E85 and 5.5 gallons 100 oct?
    35 replies | 556 view(s)
  • VegasJD's Avatar
    04-27-2015, 10:02 PM
    I wanted to share my recent outrageous interaction with MFactory. I wanted to get an lsd for my 135 dct. About 10 weeks ago they were offering specials for chinese new year and thought i would put my order in and get one since it was $300 off the normal price. So on February 22nd i paypal my $2000 to them. They contacted told me it might be a few weeks to get cores and i was fine with that. Then it became a month...nothing no pms from them at all ever...i pm them and response was this: Re: deal on dct lsd?Hey there, I can confirm we have 4 cores coming in just now, and should be arriving in a few days time. once we receive them, we can get the machine work done on them, and then starting building the units with the LSD. I'll update you on the progress next week when I get more news. Thanks and sorry for the delay! Originally Posted by VegasJD So its been 2 weeks since I sent you payment for the LSD, Whats the progress and when might it ship to me? Thanks, James Originally Posted by MFactory We've had some difficulty sourcing good low mileage cores, but have a couple of them coming in soon. Will keep you updated. Thanks and sorry for the delay. Originally Posted by VegasJD ok so its almost been a month...any update? so I wait another week pm them and get this: Re: deal on dct lsd?1 of the DCT cores arrived today, and the others should be arriving next Mon/Tues. It will take around a week for the machine shop to finish their work on the ring gears, then we can start rebuilding the cores which only takes us 1 day. So i give them another 10 days before i send a pm and i get this back im thinking well it should be shipping any day right???:confused: Re: deal on dct lsd?Hey Jim, just checked with the machine shop there, and it is due back within the next few days. Thanks and sorry for the delay. SO i wait another 15 days...in that time NO response or update from them at all. Any response from the initial came in response to MY Pm's nothing from them EVER!! Next few days is not another 2 WEEKS!!!:angry-banghead: SO its been 2 months since i paypaled $2000 so the following day i sent a dispute to paypal saying its been 2 months since i paid for goods and i have nothing. WOW you should have seen how quick they responded to paypal...record time lol 15 minutes...here is what i sent paypal and here is the response i got from Mfactory... I paid 2 months ago, i have to constantly bother the seller as to an update when product coming in and when it might be shipped. Before this last time it was 15 days since we spoke and at that time he said it would be a few days now its been over 2 weeks. I am tired of waiting they keep pushing it out and telling me to wait im tired of waiting. I shouldnt have to bother them to get an update when its done. From Seller - MFactory Competition Products 4/23/2015 00:42 PDT Instead of submitting a dispute, why not just contact/PM me? If you wanted a refund, I would have happily gave you one. You did not have to submit a dispute, thus putting our account balance in PayPal into the negative, thus locking our account and not allowing us to receive website transactions (yup, locked paypal account = can't use = can't refund you). Your core is being built just now (there were other people before you, just so you know), but I will just sell it to next in line. You're going to have to wait for the refund now though until I get a direct paypal payment (as I said, you made it so that we can't process orders through our website anymore. Thank you so much for that btw). If only you had waited a few more days (or contacted me)... So instead of contacting me and shipping out my lsd if it was "ready" like they said it was they cancelled my order. They are so happy to sell it to the next person in line...WOW that floors me. This is the angry pm i get from him complaining he had to fund paypal with his personal credit card as no funds were in the account...kinda weird that you have to fund a business with a personal cc instead of something business...sounds really shady to me!:think: Re: deal on dct lsd?You could have at least given me a chance to reply to you first before submitting a dispute. Not only did you put our PayPal account into negative, you also locked our account preventing us from processing more website orders/payments. I had to manually fund my PayPal account with my creditcard just to refund you and unlock our PayPal account. At $1500 + $500 refundable core fee, that was already heavily discounted. No where will you ever see that kind of deal ever again. If only you had given me time to reply to your PM, none of this would have happened as your core is currently being rebuilt and would have been ready to ship out today to you. As it stands, I've refunded your payment and have cancelled your order. If you do wish to reorder in future, price is $2199.95 + $500 core fee. We no longer have them on special as we have a very large list of pre-orders for these, and you would have to line up again (currently 8 people on the list). So they refund my money well im waiting on it... instead of shipping out my lsd which was supposedly "ready"...how is that a good way to do business...so i guess the deal i was getting was never really going to happen EVER!!...to me it seems i was made to wait till i got fed up and they wouldnt have to give me a deal on it. I am confused why they tell me what it costs to reorder one from them now...like i want to give them my money again to hold it for how many months they feel like it LOL NOT!!! I will give my money to a business that treats its customers right and does the right thing. this is the next pm trying to some how explain why they cancelled the order instead of shipping it out.. Re: deal on dct lsd? As mentioned, your dispute put our account into negative, which effectively locked our account, preventing us from doing further business transactions on our website. As we are a global business, and the timezone that you are in, that would mean we would have lost 5 figures in sales by the time you woke up and responded. Obviously we couldn't ship your core out to you before we received payment (which we didn't have, as PayPal removed it from our account). They had my payment for 2 months...how do they not have payment? WHAT i dont have what i paid for is the problem. The funny thing is they responded in 15 minutes to just cancel it no trying to work things out...a really GREAT way to do business. I was sent this the day after i complained to paypal as well. Re: deal on dct lsd?As mentioned, because of the timezone, you would not have (and did not) replied within an acceptable timeframe. Our business does not just cover the US, but is global. We cannot afford to have our PayPal account locked at any time, as we process orders via our website 24/7. And yes, I have a business creditcard, not that that has to do with anything. Again, I apologise for the inconvenience. I sincerely understand your frustration, but please understand why I had to cancel your order in the manner that I did. I love how he assumed i would not have responded in time...i wasnt given any time to respond it was cancelled out right lol. I understand why my order was cancelled...waiting 2 months wasnt long enough to wait...CANCELLING a discounted order is easier than filling it...WHY keep the customer happy? the goal is to make money and provide no customer service what so ever....right? So i assumed this company was in California as it says on their profile but im guessing its in china somewhere. If anyone else has had similar experiences please chime in...I wouldnt do business with a company like this ever!....i run 2 businesses and would never treat a customer like that! I wanted to share what happened to me so it doesnt happen to anyone else on the forum.
    27 replies | 707 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-26-2015, 05:56 PM
    Car and Driver is the first one to publish test figures for the 2016 ATS-V coupe. They tested the 6-speed manual version and 8-speed automatic test figures will come later. Is the new ATS-V a BMW F82 M4 killer? Not exactly, but it is a decent first attempt. Let's get the acceleration figures for the 464 horsepower and 445 lb-ft of torque 3.6 liter twin turbo V6 out of the way. 0-60 comes in 4.2 seconds, 0-100 in 9.9 seconds, and the 1/4 mile in 12.6 seconds at 115 miles per hour. Not exactly the world beating acceleration performance that the Caddy boss was bragging about. It is roughly even with a manual M3/M4. It is considerably behind Car and Driver's own figures for a DCT 2015 F80 M3 though. Will the 8-speed 8L90 automatic version close the gap? Maybe. It certainly is not 'whipping' the Germans the way Johan de Nysschen claimed and it does not have a horsepower or torque advantage anywhere other than on paper versus BMW. The Mercedes-AMG C63 S outmuscles the ATS-V by the way. Ok, so he was wrong about that. What about his statements on how it would handle, brake, and just drive better than its German rivals? Well, he is wrong there too as Car and Driver's M4 test figures show .99g on the skidpad and the ATS-V hits .97g. Where is the major advantage for the Cadillac? It does not brake any better either. It is also heavier than the BMW M4 at 3760 pounds. As far as the styling inside and out you do not get the same quality the Germans offer and you should for the $74,450 price as tested. Audi, Mercedes, and BMW simply have better looking cars and better looking interiors. Look at this garbage instrument cluster on the ATS-V: The ATS-V just is not as good as the BMW M3/M4. The Mercedes-AMG C63 remains to be seen but but those of us who have seen the the C63 and ATS-V in person (like this writer) can say it also blows the ATS-V away. The C63 has better styling inside and out, the M177 V8 is more powerful, and you are looking at roughly the same money if not less with options. Johan de Nysschen should not have opened his mouth when the ATS-V can not back his words up. The CTS-V likely will and does outmuscle its German competition with comparable quality inside and out. It likely will come in cheaper too. For the same money as its German rivals the ATS-V does not offer enough performance to overcome its deficiencies. Back to the drawing board Cadillac, you got too cocky and couldn't back it up. Specifications VEHICLE TYPE:front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door coupe PRICE AS TESTED:$74,450 (base price: $63,660) ENGINE TYPE:twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection DISPLACEMENT:217 cu in, 3564 cc Power: 464 hp @ 5850 rpm Torque: 445 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm TRANSMISSION:6-speed manual DIMENSIONS: Wheelbase: 109.3 in Length: 184.7 in Width: 72.5 in Height:54.5 in SAE interior volume: F:50 cu ft R: 34 cu ft Trunk volume: 10 cu ftCurb weight: 3760 lb C/D TEST RESULTS: Zero to 60 mph: 4.2 sec Zero to 100 mph: 9.9 sec Zero to 120 mph: 13.7 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.3 sec Top gear, 30-50 mph: 9.6 sec Top gear, 50-70 mph: 6.9 sec Standing -mile: 12.6 sec @ 115 mph Top speed (drag ltd, mfr's claim): 185 mph Braking, 70-0 mph: 154 ft Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.97 g FUEL ECONOMY: EPA city/highway driving: 16/24* mpg C/D observed: 20 mpg *C/D estimated.
    31 replies | 803 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:20 PM
    Lot's of runs here from BoostAddict member @Newguy123. His car is the camera car of course and a 2012 DCT BMW E82 135i with the Pure Turbos Stage 2 N55 turbocharger upgrade. His car produces 520 horsepower and 517 lb-ft of torque at the wheels. Strong, but he runs many cars with more power and does very well. Part of that is due to the DCT transmission and part of it is due to repeated jumping before the cones. It is what it is and unfortunately with how this event was set up (and most events are the same way) they do not have a way to take early starts into account. Let's break down the runs one by one. 1st run - 335IS DCT MOTIV 750/900 with port injection and 22 psi of boost. Slightly early start for the camera car. He opens up a lead and maintains it until they shut down. The 335is should be making more power with the Motiv kit and is not handicapped by its transmission. 2nd run - FBO + meth AT stock turbos n54 on 21-22 psi completely gutted, 1 race seat, light wheels, 6lb battery, carbon fiber hood and trunk Another early start. Pattern starting to emerge. A close start between the two nonetheless. It's close but then the N55 pulls a bit up top. 3rd run - F10 dct M6 coupe 590 on the window unsure of mods if any. Much better start although the camera car gets a minimal edge. Pretty much door to door with the N55 managing to open up a small lead. 4th run - FBO meth n54 335i on 20psi no seats. 450/470 whp/wtq Both look to get on the gas early. The N54 is quickly and easily pulled. 5th run - SC'd mustang 4.6 460whp on window Good start and then the Mustang loses it on the shift. It's all over after that. Not a contest. 6th run -R8 V10 supercharged. he said 750 CHP 650 whp. Would love to know which supercharger kit this guy is running. We assume based on the location it's VF but there are other kits. It would also be nice to know what the owner was thinking getting a supercharger instead of turbos on the V10 platform. The N55 gets on the gas early. The R8 manages to quickly run it down and pass. It continues to pull. The R8 actually looks like it is performing at its claimed 650 wheel horsepower. 7th run - n54 FBO 335i TB injection RB turbos map 7 2nd gear start A nice honest start. The N55 pulls despite a misfire. The RB N54 does look to creep back but then it's over. 8th run - rematch against the RB upgraded N54 from 3rd gear Just a much better pull down low from the N55 and it's a different race in 3rd gear. This one is quickly over. 9th run - 335i fbo payams car running VM top mount kit i believe. 700+ whp i hit limp The VM single turbo 335i takes a little while to get going here and in the lower gears is not able to pull. Once they reach higher speeds the single turbo N54 335i begins to pull hard. The N55 hits limp mode once the 335i N54 is pulling. 10th run- "650 whp supra" Early start from the N55. It doesn't matter. Once the Supra spools it just walks away. That is not a 650 whp Supra. Owner says he had boost issues and is normally in the 800's. In other words he sandbagged to beat up on the smaller guys. 11th run - Jaguar F type R, stock Both get on it early. Why even have cones? The Jaguar gets pulled. Based on this result and the others despite the limp mode issues the N55 looks to be offering performance of roughly a 124 mile per hour trap speed car. A very nice collection of runs and a strong N55 135i. Thank you to @Newguy123 for the video and hopefully he gets those limp mode issues straightened out.
    30 replies | 327 view(s)
  • Newguy123's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:31 PM
    was a good time and a verrrrry hot day. ran 20-21 psi had slight misfire issues throughout the day. https://youtu.be/QGvdW3mexLo
    30 replies | 244 view(s)
  • MFactory's Avatar
    04-28-2015, 09:54 AM
    Hey guys, we've just finished our new batch of Solid Diff Bushings: - Made from Thermoplastic Vulcanizate, not cheap polyurethane - Offers the hardness of plastic for a more solid mount - Offers the elasticity of rubber for unsurpassed durability - Self-Lubricating and resistant to oil and the elements - Will not crack or deform like polyurethane or rubber These replace all 3 of the Differential Carrier Bushings (2 x Front, 1 x Rear), effectively locking the Differential Carrier in place and removing any sloppiness associated with worn bushings. The result is a much more stable rear-end, increasing traction and reducing wheel-hop. Please Note: Due to the Differential Carrier having a more solid mount to the subframe, there may be a slight increase in NVH MSRP: $149.95 + Shipping Introductory Special (first 10 sets sold): $100 inc Shipping within North America/Europe/Australia Please let me know if you have any questions :)
    24 replies | 524 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    04-29-2015, 02:55 PM
    CAR decided to drag race the Audi RS7 and the BMW F13 M6. Now, the M6 is the lighter car. However, the advantage is in the RS7's court. It has an automatic transmission and all wheel drive so launching it as simple as putting your foot on the brake pedal, other foot on the gas, and then letting go of the brakes. Anyone can do it. The M6 takes a bit more skill and CAR does not seem to have it. Obviously a drag race is all about the launch. The torque these two twin turbo V8's put out is tremendous and the M6 will have traction issues. To get a good launch and actually make this a race the M6 needs drag rubber or at the very least the tire pressure lowered a bit and its tires warmed up to help. Obviously that is not always possible on the street and this result is what most people will see from a stoplight. The RS7 pulling away with no drama as the M6 fights for traction. Unfortunately, CAR provides no data on the trap speed or elapsed times for either car. Jump to to the 1:30 mark in the video to watch the obvious outcome.
    22 replies | 1374 view(s)
More Activity