Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Clear All
  • e92's Avatar
    Today, 06:33 PM
    e92 replied to a thread Hi. I'm new. in New Members and Birthdays
    I've learned a few words and I went there a couple times. Yeah that car will be a money pit. It still looks so slick after all these years.
    10 replies | 1010 view(s)
  • BLKROKT's Avatar
    334 replies | 37038 view(s)
  • RSL's Avatar
    Today, 06:12 PM
    I don't normally start from that low of an RPM, which is apparently why I've never seen the target "step" issue. It seemed the first "step" flat line occurs from some starting point prior to first cell value until the first column value, but may be entirely coincidental. The step may be an interpolation thing. I always start WOT logs at or over 2000RPM and never see that step, even with a 100g/s first cell. I tried a huge spread on MAF, starting at 80g/s with the next cell not until 200g/s with the same, obscenely low, BLM and target still steps going WOT <2000. So, as far as this table goes, nothing is requesting anything different between 2000-4500RPM (80-200g/s) and the step is there...flat target from just below first break (58-79g/s) and then steps up when crossing 80 my first column break point. All the logs I tried starting <2000 have this relative to first column MAF, any logs starting after 2000RPM do not. Yours exhibits the exact same behavior, flat for 20-30g/s before first break point and then stepping up when hitting it. Try starting your pull at 2000RPM instead and see if it disappears. All that said, I'm not entirely sure it's that big a deal though. Actual boost curve is pretty smooth, as mentioned before. As for not being able to reduce target, you may need to start looking at other tables because they may be pushing it up in that area. I clearly have no problem running a target of <5psi max LOL My WGDC is in no way adjusted for running this little boost LOL http://www.datazap.me/u/rsl/v11i-blm?log=0&data=4-6-13-15&solo=13&zoom=56-92
    20 replies | 1400 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:38 PM
    Welcome RonnieMl, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 4 view(s)
  • TwistedTuning's Avatar
    Today, 05:14 PM
    email me the file you are currently running, i'll look it over and see if i see something out of sorts.
    20 replies | 1400 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Today, 04:56 PM
    The JB4 is a must have for larger S55 turbos. Either Steve or I can help you with the settings and such. We both run PURE S2 turbos on our personal development S55s.
    3 replies | 108 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:44 PM
    They probably do but Syvecs is still not releasing this worldwide or at least last I heard it wasn't available. It was supposed to be ready at the end of last year but by the looks of it we'll be lucky if it's delivering as promised by the end of this year.
    205 replies | 8817 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:43 PM
    It is not stale. If you want a spot just paypal admin@boostaddict.com $100 and I'll pm you the link.
    334 replies | 37038 view(s)
  • TwistedTuning's Avatar
    Today, 04:42 PM
    I thought Andy over at AD Engineering had it on one of their cars?
    205 replies | 8817 view(s)
  • BLKROKT's Avatar
    334 replies | 37038 view(s)
  • 08_335i's Avatar
    Today, 03:45 PM
    Correction, I have his manifold, downpipe, and dump tubes. not his kit.
    1149 replies | 78258 view(s)
  • bradsm87's Avatar
    Today, 03:27 PM
    The boost target does not drop, it increases. The boost control/throttle closure logic knows nothing of BLM, just boost target. I can fix that little overboost no problem with PID, but it's not the target boost I want to run. I want lower boost but no amount of BLM lowering is getting the boost target lower.
    20 replies | 1400 view(s)
  • jt0407's Avatar
    Today, 03:18 PM
    Yes. Very tight spot to get to.
    6 replies | 247 view(s)
  • jt0407's Avatar
    Today, 03:17 PM
    yes, You need the stock solenoids, but I didn't realize that at the time.
    6 replies | 516 view(s)
  • ross22's Avatar
    Today, 03:15 PM
    Terry, your point is well taken without a few backup runs, one run is easily considered a fluke. Dyno says 500+ on this combo, now I just need a stack of time slips to really prove it. In a few months once we dip into the 70s I'll be back to collect them. I'm considering a JB4 to stack on top for logging, controllable boost cureves, and hopefully some more fuel. I would be interested in hearing your perspective on that.
    3 replies | 108 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 03:01 PM
    Bump. Syvecs seems to be having some trouble rolling out this ECU. I haven't seen any N54's running it and no E9X M3 S65's either.
    205 replies | 8817 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 02:59 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread Single Turbo Build in N54
    Yep, sorry, didn't realize it was closed. There is another thread on the Syvecs topic which I linked you to that is open.
    316 replies | 19079 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 02:58 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread Single Turbo Build in N54
    Oh well that's why you can't add a comment lol. Here's the right thread: http://www.boostaddict.com/showthread.php?74390-Syvecs-N54-ECU-comes-in-at-5300
    316 replies | 19079 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Today, 02:19 PM
    I have a feeling you didn't really cut a 1.49 60' ;) But sounds like decent runs. At lower boost levels the turbos don't really do much over stock so crank them up to really see what it can do!
    3 replies | 108 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Today, 12:53 PM
    With a JB4 you can pull all that crap out as it spoofs the signals back to the DME normally anyway. ;)
    6 replies | 516 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 11:59 AM
    Welcome kulak134821, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 78 view(s)
  • DavidV's Avatar
    Today, 11:15 AM
    Normally long crancs are an indication to the HPFP going south. If you keep your car long enough eventually it will happen to you... Keep driving it with a progressively failing pump and the car will throw all sorts of fuel related codes.
    6 replies | 247 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 11:03 AM
    Hey rnitto: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 91 view(s)
  • Jeffman's Avatar
    Today, 10:56 AM
    Brad, I think we are experience similar issues. Why should the boost targets be increasing in a step-wise fashion, tracking to a certain degree the BLM v MAF table entries? I also observed this phenomenon (see my Datazap link in an earlier post above) and raised this with Martial, suggesting that the target boost interpolation logic was a little buggy. Your Datazap MAF Boost Target 116 8.5 125 9.3 Your BLM v MAF Table 2nd gear MAF BLM 113 1.40 120 1.08 158 1.14 You are getting an over boost-throttle closure when your MAF(WGDC) is 139-148. Perhaps your overboost is occurring because you're telling your engine to now have BLM = 1.08 @ MAF=120 while your turbos are spooling up and you're building pressure, then suddenly you're telling it to slow down. I may be wrong but it could be that our system (control logic in view of the dynamic limitations of our turbos, wastegates, charge pipes, etc) doesn't like sudden reduction in boost request during spooling. I'd try changing your BLM value at MAF=113 from 1.40 to less than or equal to 1.08. In other words don't reduce BLM in the table as MAF increases.
    20 replies | 1400 view(s)
  • ross22's Avatar
    Today, 10:21 AM
    Last night I went out to Royal Purple Raceway in Baytown, TX. Weather was a nice cool 91 degrees. About 4 degrees cooler than normal. The intent was NOT to race, just to act as pit crew. Yeah, right. The car had about 3/4 full fuel tank, I added 3 gallons of 104 race fuel. Yes, that was dumb. Too much 93 to dilute not mention the car ended up with a full fuel tank (lots of weight). I'll cut to the chase. On stock tires, BMS drop in filters, stock exhaust, Eurocharged tune, DPs, and PureTurbos = 11.437@119.86 60' = 1.497 1/8 = 7.386 MPH = 96.03 1000 = 9.578 By my second pass about two hours later, the diesel, Chevy, F150 trucks and the rest of us street cars had torn up the track and I could no longer hook. I actually got a bit loose and decided to call it a night. That pass was 12.13@122 Needless to say I am happy with the combo. Effective on the street, effect at the track. Yes, I really should get a stickier tire/wheel combo. It will be a few months before we drop into decent temperatures around here, plenty of time to research a good track combo. Thanks to Pure for their awesome product. Thanks to Eurocharged for the install and the tune to go with them.
    3 replies | 108 view(s)
  • BeastMode335i's Avatar
    Today, 08:14 AM
    Naa not yet, but I'm going to today.. that's the one under the starter right?
    6 replies | 247 view(s)
  • CS@MFactory's Avatar
    Today, 06:45 AM
    All PMs replied to :)
    461 replies | 33798 view(s)
  • CS@MFactory's Avatar
    Today, 06:44 AM
    Bump TTT :)
    127 replies | 14037 view(s)
  • CS@MFactory's Avatar
    Today, 06:44 AM
    Bump TTT :)
    237 replies | 20141 view(s)
  • bertinoj's Avatar
    Today, 06:04 AM
    So you just plugged the stock solonoids back in ?
    6 replies | 516 view(s)
More Activity