Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Clear All
  • BuraQ's Avatar
    Today, 08:45 PM
    I'm not disagreeing with anything said here, but I need to clearup a misunderstanding. People think we plotted some marketing schime to pull off what we did and dragged a customer into this while missing a big part of the story or intentional decided to over look the facts to paint a picture to beneift themselves. I do not prefference dyno tuning, never was a dyno tuner. I believe in street tuning the car gear to gear for optimal performance. I ONLY go to a dyno for reference to get an idea of how much power I am puting down and to improve the power curves if needed. So when the car leaves the dyno shop, I know what I am driving is realistic to the numbers Before I even knew anything, it was the sole intention of our customer to test the TFT inlets Later on I found out what he wanted to do after reading the thread on these new turbo inlets that people were calling shenanigans on. Our customer got the inlets requested me to retune his car for track and DD, not dyno. I retuned his car 21-18 PSI (withing in the TMAP sensors limits), all gears tested, IJE0S, healthy timing (later dynoed 528/555) he is now track ready Not only did he see the gains from the inlets he wanted to push the RB more to see if they were really worth his money since he was only using sub 40% wgdc to make that power. He wanted to see 600 hp, and he was well aware of the risks and would exceed over the TMAP sensor limits. The goal was achieved, he was happy and posted his results. The example of this, IMO, was to demonstrate how much more power the RBs are cable of making with their "preffered tuner". So for the guys running JB4 with backend flashes on MT cars screw the single as it will be very possible to achieve 700 whp with the TFT & RB setup, my theory This isnt about us its about what the RB Turbos are capable of doing with the TFT inlets. If we, the toddlers, can do it, then, it should be very easy for the PROTuners and BMS to do whom have better tools, and equipmnt to get your 600-700 whp on this setup...... "safely" We are just the scapegoats to beat up on to bail themselves out of the trash talk about the RB turbos and the TFT inlets trying to smoke screen shnit
    41 replies | 992 view(s)
  • 135pats's Avatar
    Today, 08:45 PM
    I felt bad the first time I put training collars on my parent's German and Foxhound back in the day...But they really don't "hurt" them so long as you use them properly. Don't rip on the leash or anything like that. Firm pressure gets the point across without anything more than minor discomfort. Eventually there's no need for one anymore.
    110 replies | 5295 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 08:41 PM
    That's the TV I was considering too! It's pretty cheap at Costco. To go to a 90 inch would run me more than double.
    2299 replies | 86950 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 08:40 PM
    I'm considering getting him a training collar. The problem I have is he keeps pulling hard at the leash when we go on walks and he tries to chase cars. It wasn't a big deal when he was a puppy but now that he is bigger and stronger it's a constant fight the entire walk. I'm just worried a training collar will hurt him.
    110 replies | 5295 view(s)
  • Dirty Dog's Avatar
    Today, 08:37 PM
    It's only a matter of time before people start posting their supposed "Torque Monster" maps. Save your money Terry as I think these guys are way out of their league. Good at tinkering, maybe but so much yet to learn.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Today, 08:35 PM
    I actually digress, he isn't even worth answering. Its that ignorant. You are correct, its if not PID take it out of here.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Slicksilver's Avatar
    Today, 08:35 PM
    T, to be fair, you have also not been forthcoming with logs either. I was in one of your threads on a record N55 dyno run you did on JB4. You posted the JB4 log but those are way too hard to read from a small screenshot and so I asked for a datazap log and you said basically you never share those as they are IP, or something like that.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • SCGT's Avatar
    Today, 08:33 PM
    I'm going to go for the N54 WR 1st gear dyno. Prepare to be... underwhelmed... lol
    123 replies | 6206 view(s)
  • The Convert's Avatar
    Today, 08:32 PM
    I hate that I am going off topic to say this, but could all of you who are saying ANYTHING other than PID stuff please shut up? I don't care if you're bashing someone or giving your rebuttals...this isn't the thread for it so just act like men and take it elsewhere, all of you.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 08:30 PM
    It is our understanding that using higher gears, is a way to cheat the system and inflate figures on the screen (or graph)… but not really be representative of the amount of power the engine is actually making to the wheels. One would think that enthusiasts are interest in ACTUAL power, not fictitious power. If this is not the case, then every record pull should be in the highest possible gear (with no scrutinizing). Rob
    123 replies | 6206 view(s)
  • SCGT's Avatar
    Today, 08:25 PM
    I added a caveat that if God himself came down and blessed the hpfp with the holy horsepower staff, it might be able to do it, but I got negged. Or if you targetted some ridiculous a/f ratio, but I digress. How did this get away from PID's?
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Today, 08:18 PM
    Is the car in question on meth? With meth flowing no problem. But 600whp on 100% E85 without meth on the OEM high pressure pump. I don't see that happening.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Legionofboom's Avatar
    Today, 08:10 PM
    25% isn't right, where have you found that information? Not all AWD cars have the same DT loss. I have spoke to a few people about this as I just bought a XI, and they all confirmed to me the BMW system isn't that inefficient.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Dietcoke's Avatar
    Today, 08:01 PM
    In his defense, even in 5th gear, it is still an ACTUAL record, because it actually happened and actually produced that result. Whether its accepted that 5th gear is the 'measurement standard' or not is irrelevant.
    123 replies | 6206 view(s)
  • Slicksilver's Avatar
    Today, 07:59 PM
    LOL, Tony no matter how many times I point this out you still seem to not learn. Brian May's 600 rwhp run was done on an inline walbro 450 -E85 compliant, not a Walbro 255, big difference! He was even fuel stable on both pumps at 640 rwhp on 100% E85. He posted his fueling logs to prove it. Now on the Xi, fueling was an issue, but it was 600 AWHP, big difference again. 25% drivetrain loss vs 12% DT loss. So 600awhp = ~700rwhp, and I am not sure what LPFP upgrade he was running, if inline 255, no surprise there that fueling was an issue at those power levels.
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 07:58 PM
    Now that we have 3rd party data showing these results are 100% possible, we feel it is time to take a look deeper into whether or not this TFT car is the actual N54 Stock Frame World Record holder. In order to confirm we have requested that Brian@TFT provide his best dynographs, specifically only the ones that have the affiliated MPH graphs (to validate the pull was in 4th). Once provided if found to be over 627rwhp we will post both graphs and announce the new record holder. We also realize that the VTT 2+ Stock Frame Record is known to be at 645rwhp, but in order for it to be an actual record it must be verified via a MPH graph. If anyone wishes to reach out to VTT ( @Sticky ) it is requested that they produce their 645rwhp MPH Dyno graph in order to not have their standing record jeopardized. Thanks, Rob
    123 replies | 6206 view(s)
  • Kommodore's Avatar
    Today, 07:55 PM
    I am also willing to contribute to this pot. The process must be similar to this? OR, is it moreso, we know what all the maps are, we just don't know what they do precisely?
    126 replies | 2466 view(s)
  • klipseracer's Avatar
    41 replies | 992 view(s)
  • bobS's Avatar
    Today, 07:44 PM
    bobS replied to a thread Project - Timeattack e90 in S65
    Oh wow....those fenders look sick!!!
    41 replies | 1028 view(s)
  • klipseracer's Avatar
    Today, 07:42 PM
    klipseracer replied to a thread Tranny Porn!! in N54
    I see you live on the dangerous side of life as well.
    4 replies | 41 view(s)
  • 135pats's Avatar
    Today, 07:39 PM
    135pats replied to a thread Tranny Porn!! in N54
    :laughing-rofl:
    4 replies | 41 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 07:39 PM
    This + GIAC tune: Or if you want a 4 door Ferrari, the M3.
    13 replies | 70 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 07:37 PM
    The S4 is the better choice for him than the RS4.
    13 replies | 70 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 07:37 PM
    He's not going to go for that.
    13 replies | 70 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 07:36 PM
    I still have it but it doesn't apply in your situation as it's fully built. Motor, block, transmission, custom headers, supercharger, meth injection, etc. The main problem with the M3 is the OEM bearings. There were parts recalled so you need to check and see that it is all up to day. The M3 is a great car. It's truly a driver's car.
    13 replies | 70 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 07:35 PM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum QuinnPVQer.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
More Activity