Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Last 30 Days Clear All
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 04:46 AM
    IzettaPick, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 04:42 AM
    GraceZ88zs, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 04:24 AM
    Hey Sonja26Bqc: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • 654's Avatar
    Today, 03:32 AM
    Sounds a very good reason not to tune Cobb.
    135 replies | 2926 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 03:02 AM
    DannLuxton, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 2 view(s)
  • mave198's Avatar
    Today, 02:59 AM
    Wait so you're saying what's been found and defined as to their purpose is only 10% of what tables are actually in the DME?? Can't believe more hasn't been done to discover and define these unused tables. Cobb obviously has given up though.....
    135 replies | 2926 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 02:53 AM
    PoppyZTYlp, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 4 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 02:37 AM
    Hey Ns-alshehhi: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 8 view(s)
  • GuidoK's Avatar
    Today, 02:33 AM
    Actually that's quite a good price (I always thought titanium bolts would be much more expensive... but thanks to china...:rolleyes: A 12.9 grade steel m7x25 costs about $3 ex. shipping so definately not cheaper. Your kit looks very nice. interesting that the lenght of the supercharger (the stock jaguar one) apparently lines up with the bmw pully system more or less.
    194 replies | 10262 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 02:20 AM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum DataBaseNut.
    0 replies | 5 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 01:57 AM
    Good honest post. Appreciate this. We are genuinely interested in seeing how more of these 2+'s perform ourselves. As you may (or may not know), we ran our version of them and saw some immediate things we didn't like… primarily in the plumbing. Knowing that it would be a train wreck to sell product to many consumers while armed with this information, we pulled the plug on the product altogether. It did not seem fair to sell something to someone without full disclosure of what they were going to need to actually utilize them to any potential whatsoever. As we now have found the inlets were even a massive restriction on the Standard RB's, much more than ever imagined. But given what we saw on the Super RB's makes perfect sense. Then while in a revision process, we determined that even with an inlet fix that there are so many other gaping deficiencies with the 2+ build strategy that the final product still would be half thought out and we couldn't bring ourselves to market it without much redesign. So we have been pushing along much further to get the entire system the way we want it. I am very curious to see how you guys all do with your setups, as from much studying it is believed that those wheels (19T+) are just too large for the OEM TD03 Compressor housings altogether. Theres just not enough distance between the exducer and diffuser to have an efficient low to high pressure transition, and the housing radius is too small. If found to be correct this will make them very inefficient and cause IATs rise much quicker than normal and with tapped out airflow, and just an otherwise unhappy combination of parts. The corrective action for this is to provide a compressor housing that is the appropriate size for such a large wheel, although that again opens up another design pandoras box with all of the plumbing. Anyway much of this is theory, solely based around the compressor side only (turbine talk another time), so looking forward to comparison data that is forthcoming. Rob
    53 replies | 1309 view(s)
  • Kommodore's Avatar
    Today, 01:47 AM
    I have the hex dump. Fairly large file. Gonna play with this a bit to form a better opinion on this matter.
    135 replies | 2926 view(s)
  • Njz's Avatar
    Today, 01:40 AM
    Maxing out the turbos was never something I intended to do, the main reason for getting them in my case was the fact that I could get them on and tuned for around 575 whp and still have some headroom to bump it up a bit if I decided to later. With the introduction of the inlets its obvious that I likely could have achieved the same on stage 2/RB's anyway which is still fine with me. Now this means I am able to run a bit more power and work the turbos that much less theoretically increasing turbo life. I do plan to try to get some numbers on the dyno for fun but the limits of this transmission are pretty clearly demonstrated and there is only one person that dailies around 600 whp that has managed to keep his together for any length of time so that tune would most likely only see the strip once and hopefully provide some 60-130 times as well. I know even at 575-600 whp my trans is going to start to slip and require me to back off on throttle before shifts so I have no delusions that I am safe at those power levels but I do hope that the AT will stay together until the summer. I would be very interested to see how this tune behaves on the street, if that HPFP can actually keep up on a multiple gear pull I would be very surprised. Airflow aside (which the RBs obviously provide plenty) I see a very dead HPFP in your near future, this is no stranger to me as I have had 3-4 go myself trying to run full e85 with no meth over a year and a half ago.
    53 replies | 1309 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 01:38 AM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum Asenblilia.
    0 replies | 5 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 01:34 AM
    Welcome AFusaroorb, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 4 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 01:18 AM
    In all seriousness, thanks for at least letting it go down to this extent. It's not your responsibility to make them provide it. Sad this company is shady enough to run and hide anytime questioned, but it is what it is. Those reading can see that anytime VTT makes the classic "we are all about transparency" statement that they are actually right up there with Bernie Madoff. The 645 "record" will be assimilated very soon either way.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:10 AM
    We're all intelligent enough to sort through the nonsense... I think.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 01:08 AM
    Fair enough. I guess I will just make the blind signature also claiming whatever record I wish. Thanks for clarifying that it all really means jack squat.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • subaru335i's Avatar
    Today, 01:04 AM
    Of course not, it's not like the N54 is a god like motor like the 2JZ. I heard that the 2JZ was banned from F1 because the engine was forged by Jesus and was an unfair advantage.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 01:04 AM
    Just 3 days ago we post the xi record and Tony comes in with this: It was immediately provided. Now we ask for this in return. So simple. Once provided this is done. It would've been done an hour ago. Do not understand why the one who is always touting utmost transparency always runs and hides when heaven forbid is asked a question of provided a piece of proof that appears to be left out. Well Dzenno just said we need uncorrected data as well (which we provided). But still would be nice to start with something and move from there.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • SCGT's Avatar
    Today, 01:02 AM
    Found it. Sorry Tony and Rob, I am somewhat immature sometimes. xoxo
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 01:01 AM
    I'm not responsible for every vendors product results or marketing. They share what they want to share. If they want to pay to advertise and post pictures of kittens all day instead of their products that is their prerogative.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Kommodore's Avatar
    Today, 01:00 AM
    Okay, so it's more like reverse-engineering the logic. Let's find an engineer, get a price, and do a kickstarter? Lol. >_>
    135 replies | 2926 view(s)
  • Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
    Today, 12:58 AM
    Joe, If you have the data please just post yourself? We do not take things at face value. This is a very simple request, why must everything be like pulling teeth around here? I just showed some cards, you either fold or you show that you have them beat. Period.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Today, 12:57 AM
    Who would want to see a one person fight? I will not even respond directly to him, I have less interest in arguing or fighting with him. You have the graph, we know what is going on here, clawing, and scratching for market share by trying to make others look bad. Trying to make your results better, by calling actual better results into question. Things like this reveal a lot about a persons character. Night guys
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 12:57 AM
    You didn't do that on the stock internals.
    165 replies | 6567 view(s)
  • JoshBoody's Avatar
    Today, 12:57 AM
    Tables are easy to find, but needs someone that understands how to link/define them. What's defined is <10%. A good start would be linking DME pins to the hex probably. This is getting way over my head though.
    135 replies | 2926 view(s)
More Activity