Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Last 30 Days Clear All
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:35 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Because it isn't a new level. It's the same thing that has always been done. That VT3 DCT car was the same thing except without headers. How is raising the boost and adding headers some kind of new level? What new level? How is it a new level?
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:34 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    I don't understand what bragging is going on. I'm not sure what to tell you. Making 785 or whatever at redline is not the same as doing this with another 1200 rpm to spare. Are you just not able to look at graphs or what? Not to mention since Dodson solved the trans we spun the YSI to 25+ psi. Come on, even you aren't this stupid. Are you? What do you mean negative repping you? My rep power is over 200. If I neg repped you then you couldn't talk. I would love for you to talk. Live closer and end this how? With what? You would need a bigger blower among other things. That's if people even keep playing with blowers. Shhh. Look, let me be clear. I'm happy you pushed your VT3. Now you know this is a bit difficult. You are doing the community a disservice by not being forthcoming but that's up to you. I don't know why this is some life or death thing people making it out to be. Relax.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • bobS's Avatar
    Today, 06:33 PM
    bobS replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Brainwashing? Is it not a record? its being pushed to new levels.... i don't understand how my statement was a example of "brain washing"
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • 4doorbmwpower's Avatar
    Today, 06:33 PM
    4doorbmwpower replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    lol this is great.... Sticky dont let em....
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • JK210's Avatar
    Today, 06:27 PM
    JK210 replied to a thread Best Setup for 6mt 1/4 mile in N54
    just curious does anyone know what the stock turbo 6mt 1/4 mile record is?
    6 replies | 141 view(s)
  • img's Avatar
    Today, 06:26 PM
    img replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Then post your highest HP Dyno. You are just bragging with no proof haha. And stop negative repping me ha. I wish you lived closer so we can line up and end this. Well, someday !
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:20 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    There's no shame. Just tell the truth. You're not going to be for a while though, eh? Me too man! :) Glad you have a sense of humor. But... you didn't. You posted a myriad of runs under my low boost record made without even hitting redline. It took you this long to barely even post a few whp higher (if you even did, still no 785 runfile) than a run leaving how much whp on the table? Do you really somehow in your head think you're making more power? How? It's not even mathematically possible. I never lost it. You're still playing around with triple digits and 700's? You're proud of this? Why? Man, we were there years ago. But I hope you get things straightened out. Really, I do. The fact you came here to try to post this knowing full well what happened tells me plenty about your character. You can't write a script like this. If you want to keep pushing by all means. Let's get the info out there.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • img's Avatar
    Today, 06:12 PM
    img replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Lmao making up stories again !? I actually show up to events unlike you ! When was the last time you should up ? Should I post the video of " guys guys, that's my car, that's my car !" I got a good laugh out of that video haha mat least my baby blower wiped out your record playa. I hope you can take it back soon. Fanboy is better than a cabana boy !
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:06 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Weird, I hear differently. It's too bad you can't be honest. No I'm upset because you don't have any integrity. Tell people what's really going on. Do you want me to do it for you? You don't have any records. Why don't you show us what you car can do on the strip? ;) What's the problem? Come on man, you and I know what's up. Any disagreement on power is pointless as you can't match a YSI with your baby blower. The real disagreement though is that you are going around trying to promote this as a 'record' when for one it isn't and for two... well, maybe it's time to show the world the lengths a fanboy will go to? Do you want me to do it or should you?
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • img's Avatar
    Today, 06:00 PM
    img replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Things are going smooth man. You are getting upset cause you got zero records. I'm sure when you roll your car out it will put some serious power. You should get a vintage plate for it . can you post your graph plz. I promise I won't make any jokes . Why don't you get an M4. It's a new platform and there's plenty of mods for it on the shelf.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:00 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    The beginning of S65 tuning.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • 4doorbmwpower's Avatar
    Today, 05:59 PM
    4doorbmwpower replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    where did this argument come from?
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:57 PM
    rays335i, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:50 PM
    Welcome Nindjc, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:46 PM
    Welcome Dj.chesley85, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:42 PM
    KendrickEr, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 05:40 PM
    GLWS
    1 replies | 41 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 05:34 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    I can see you are a quantity over quality person. When I decide it is.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • Fishayyy's Avatar
    Today, 05:13 PM
    Fishayyy replied to a thread Want to Buy: WTB HPF Gen 2 Exhaust in Buy/Sell - Parts
    Bump
    11 replies | 224 view(s)
  • Acheron's Avatar
    Today, 05:11 PM
    Are any of these adaptions meant to be run with the car running?
    9 replies | 238 view(s)
  • Abacus38's Avatar
    Today, 04:41 PM
    Abacus38 replied to a thread Best Setup for 6mt 1/4 mile in N54
    Edit: Kindly do not link there.
    6 replies | 141 view(s)
  • Torgus's Avatar
    Today, 04:36 PM
    Torgus replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    I can see why there is so many FI M3s on this forum. When is your next race?
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:26 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Definitely. That is called a technicality. Some of us hope people can understand more than just X vs. X. For example, why X is what it is. That's fine. Think what you want. If you can't look at 7200 rpm vs. 8400 rpm and how the curve works I can't do anything for you. Essentially you have a smaller blower at peak matching what a larger blower did not make at peak. That's a giant disparity right there. How hasn't it? It makes more power EVERYWHERE in the powerband at similar boost. The TT's are a whole different ballgame versus a Vortech blower. Guess you missed this? http://www.bimmerboost.com/content.php?4866-Centrifugal-supercharger-vs-Turbo-Gintani-E9X-M3-S65-V8-twin-turbo-kit-dyno-results-and-comparison-to-the-Gintani-supercharger-kit-at-the-same-7-5-psi-of-boost It's my business what I'm doing. You have seen a dyno and it tells you plenty. I'd rather just run people. You just sound basic.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • trading10's Avatar
    Today, 04:17 PM
    I'm learning about how, when, and why to reset different things. I don't want to just arbitrarily make changes or delete data without having valid reasons for doing so. My last message was an update for the purpose of documenting what I've done, the results, and to encourage others to chime in. After doing so much searching on this subject and finding useless or only partially helpful threads, one after another, I wanted to create a thread that not only helps me get my own questions answered, but also to create a useful thread that others will find when searching for the same information. Here's a good reference I found in another forum that discusses "Flashing, Learning, Resetting" the ECU, including a method for speeding up the fuel trim learning process, and doing it correctly. According to this other thread, learning only occurs when in 'closed loop' mode during slow and steady throttle movements. Otherwise, the ECU is in 'open loop' mode, and does not learn new fuel trims - it can only apply fuel trims learned previously when in closed loop mode. It goes on to state that if insufficient closed loop fuel trim data exists, the result can be a sluggish and hesitant car. That was more or less my experience with the Stage1 map before I learned this from the thread started by 'Chuck99' at ft86club. Once I did this procedure as outlined, the car responded much differently - throttle response was much smoother, and the sudden bursts of acceleration were also smoothed out for a more drivable power curve. A personality change essentially. Now, I'm interested in the v8bait map, and what the recorded data means. I drove the car just after flashing without doing any resets, slowly accelerating from 2000 to 5000 rpms in 1st-3rd gears. Behavior seems good to me, but I question the Cyl 1 timing figures (show in above screen shots) because they were so much different than what I was getting using the Stage1 map after resetting and proper fuel trim learning. This is a partial quote from Chuck99's thread, with a link: "http://www.ft86club {dot com}/forums/showthread.php?t=68328" "Minimizing issues and speeding up learning after a Flash or ECU Reset As the ECU is reset as part of the flash process all the learned ignition and fueling parameters are reset. The ECU will also perform some diagnostics and calibrations on the VVT cam sensors and throttle position sensors after a reset or flash. To minimize any issues and speed up learning after a Flash or Reset Turn ignition fully off after a flash or reset Turn ignition fully ON, do not start car, do not touch throttle, leave for 20 sec this will allow ECU to perform its diagnostics and calibrations on cam position and throttle position sensors Turn off ignition Turn on ignition leave for 20 sec then start car do not touch throttle Let car idle for at least a minute and wait till it settles at the normal idle of about 750 RPM, again do not touch throttle. After normal idle is achieved then drive car. Fuel Trim Learning To speed up learning of fuel trims you will need to drive smoothly. The ECU only learns fuel trims in “Closed loop “ mode this is during slow or steady throttle movements and cruise and idle. When your driving aggressively on/off throttle and wide open throttle the ECU is in “open loop” fueling mode and does not learn fuel trims, it just applies the fuel trims learned in “closed loop” fueling mode. If the ECU has not had enough learning time in closed loop it will apply incorrect fuel trims and car may feel sluggish or hesitant till it learns. If your MAF has been scaled correctly hence reducing fuel trims to less than around 2% this learning process is very quick or not needed. Even with stock intake components the MAF scaling can be out by around 8% in places if individual MAF scaling has not been done, more if you have changed intakes and not re-scaled MAF. Vishnu Reset -Trick Yes you can google it :-) Basically it speed's learning of Fuel Trims and will Reset you IAM to 1 if it has dropped due previous knock events (assuming its not knocking at low/steady loads if so you have serious knock problems). If you do 2 or 3 "vishnu reset" runs ie partial light (20% or so) steady throttle runs from 2000-5000rpm or so in 3rd it will set your fuel trims and reset your IAM (assuming is not knocking at low/steady loads) if its less than 1. The gear is not really important its the partial steady throttle the longer the run the better. A slight uphill grade can be useful (or you can left foot brake). This works anytime to reset IAM back to 1 (assuming its not knocking at light load) it useful when your chasing knock in an area and want IAM back to 1 without an ECU reset."
    9 replies | 238 view(s)
  • SCGT's Avatar
    Today, 04:16 PM
    SCGT replied to a thread Properly sizing PI injectors in N54
    Pulsations are a pain in the ass to deal with. One of the real issues is that the equipment isn't high enough resolution to capture the true peaks and valleys going on. System piping is a huge cause, any step increases that are greater than about a 7* tapering change will look like a brick wall to the pressure wave. Bad. The injector events are going to want to cause pulsations; you're removing fluid, then slamming that "valve" (i.e. injector) shut. Batch firing is only going to make this worse, intuitively, as you're now opening/closing 6 little valves. The question is if this is really worth solving. Smoothing things out sure can make a difference in weird little things like random misfires or pump longevity, etc. Still, it'd be very easy to turn this into a science project with little obvious benefit. IMO all part of proper design -get it reasonable and honestly don't bother to strive for perfection on a system like this as it's not worth a hell of a lot more than "pretty good". If it were me, I'd start small and easy, like using a restrictive tapered orifice in the fuel rail inlet. You're not flow limited so who cares. Shy of that I'd consider the use of an expansion chamber somewhere along the fuel line, a sudden diameter increase and decrease at least 8x that of the fuel line diameter. That's no easier on the pump but it is easier on the piping. Any of the small in line or "tee" pulsation dampers will not work. The pressure wave is going too fast (mach 5) and will cruise right by it unless you fool around with geometry. That's my 2c input for now.
    22 replies | 407 view(s)
  • Torgus's Avatar
    Today, 04:14 PM
    Torgus replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Well until someone puts out a higher ready dynograph it will be known as the record. That is how records work. Claiming yours should put out more is only that, a claim. No proof, just words. The Gintani TT should put out better numbers than both. But it hasn't. Which is why it is not a record, and just a claim or as you would say "It doesn't take a genius to go look at the turbo specs." Why will no one ever see a dyno of your car? Why the secret? When will your car will run at an event? Someone sounds like they have sand in their vagina.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
  • igotag's Avatar
    Today, 04:08 PM
    Original BB Software https://www.dropbox.com/s/ecb54sdwjtvzemf/BimmerBoostFlashObfusicated.exe?dl=0
    3 replies | 95 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:00 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Look man, this isn't about my car. This isn't about me. I pushed things to 24 psi if you must know. This thing isn't near a YSI M3 at 18 psi. It doesn't take a genius to go look at the blower specs. All this happens to be is an exercise is trying to eek out a few numbers on a graph to impress idiots who do not know any better by exceeding numbers my car put down ages ago without even revving out. Then they can claim some irrelevant record and wave their pricks around the forums. It impresses people like bobS you see. It's nice to see more built motor setups out there but this is nothing more than your basic ESS kit with boost turned up + headers on race gas on a low compression motor. Wow, they really pushed the limit! New heights being hit on the S65! Amazing omgomgomgogmg wowzer. Top notch engineering. Seriously, the engine builder and ARH deserve most of the credit here. It's unfortunate that back then I was not able to get a clean dyno run on the stock DCT. I don't know why things do not go smoothly but maybe that is the way it has to be. If people want to think this is a 'new' record they can go right ahead and do so.
    59 replies | 698 view(s)
More Activity