Activity Stream

Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Clear All
  • sA x sKy's Avatar
    Today, 02:03 AM
    Terry always coming through for people as always :)
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • Flinchy's Avatar
    Today, 01:57 AM
    front subframe won't fit. that's about it.
    8 replies | 226 view(s)
  • Flinchy's Avatar
    Today, 01:38 AM
    True, good point that's a hell of a lot more fuel flow needed!
    17 replies | 324 view(s)
  • jputtho2's Avatar
    Today, 01:30 AM
    jputtho2 replied to a thread Ghost cam? in N54
    That's my car and it's a full exhaust but essentially straight pipe 4" to dual 3" with a small almost useless vibrant race muffler. Oh and single turbo. I don't have the 'ghost cam' idle tune either. That's simply a mix of the type of exhaust I have, single turbo, and a leaner e85 idle.
    45 replies | 1443 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 12:45 AM
    Welcome bcweir, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 11 view(s)
  • BoostDr's Avatar
    Today, 12:24 AM
    Terry as always, your generosity is bar none. Either way, looking forward to what the future holds for not only the forum but the platform, such great things in the works I'm sure!:drinking3:
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • ope92's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:58 PM
    Free jb4!?! Where do I sign up?
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • lulz_m3's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:55 PM
    True but you have to look at the energy content of the fuels to see why methanol is superior. A gallon of E85 has 61% of the energy of a gallon pump, whereas methanol only has 45%. The extra volume of methanol needed will provide an advantage.
    17 replies | 324 view(s)
  • ope92's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:46 PM
    Time for a front page article
    69 replies | 2511 view(s)
  • bigdnno98's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    As always, Terry is the man.
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • Redbeanbun's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:20 PM
    My conjectures - I suspect the the max times in the SB tables refers to a duration of time of which the injectors would shut down during a shift. Shortening the duration should get a faster recovery for AFR if that theory is true. The min load decrease in that section - I assume MAF measurements are used as a trigger for fuel cut off. Converted the stock value and got 7 g/s assuming 2800 rpm shift points. Idling is about 7-8 g/s. Still need more testing on that one. In the meantime - got it set for maxed at 350 g/s to see if this would eliminate one factor with the post shift lean AFR in certain situations. So for fuel cutoff it seems to look at - speed - MAF - load Another thought - The cut in timings is to induce engine torque inertia reduction as the gear change so as to minimize the shock the clutches experience when the engine and transmission engages. The wider the torque delta, the more likely the clutches would get burnt though you would get a nice slam into gear feeling at each shift. Typically the DCT timings are around 80ms while the 6hp is 200ms on the gearbox. So on the engine side, even though the ignition timing cut cannot be avoided but you can reduce the duration of the timing cut which is currently 2000ms.
    384 replies | 15759 view(s)
  • bigdnno98's Avatar
    69 replies | 2511 view(s)
  • TRES's Avatar
    3263 replies | 353099 view(s)
  • Flinchy's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:47 PM
    They have similar specific heat capacities. ethanol liquid 2.430 methanol liquid 2.533
    17 replies | 324 view(s)
  • 7plagues's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:47 PM
    Sweet. Glad Terry helping out.
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • TRES's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:43 PM
    I would replace all the rear arms with the megan arms especially the camber and toe arms. The bushings are way better. If you can switch the subframe bushing to solid ones that will be a plus, but the m3 rubber will do fine. You will hear all types of comments about noise etc, its all subjective and not that noisy at all. If you can also get some solid diff mounts that will also help with tracking, solid trans mounts will produce noise. I run 840 rear springs and the car has been great on the street and the track. Its all about what you want to achieve with your car and your driving ability.
    7 replies | 443 view(s)
  • 08_335i's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:35 PM
    So I'm switching over to single turbo and no longer need my ER charge pipe or injen intake. The ER chargepipe is a very solid piece that fits PERFECTLY. It is the long version, which on earlier n54's deletes the POS piece above the intercooler. The injen intake is missing the power steering bracket, but you could easily fab up your own. ER charge pipe long version trial flange 1 meth bung - $275 + shipping. I'll even throw in the trial BOV for an extra $150 if you buy it together. Injen intake - $250 + Shipping
    0 replies | 7 view(s)
  • _ink's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:19 PM
    I'm running PI and methanol concurrently.. Previous to PI, my meth setup was 2 bungs, one in the CP and one in the IC. Since the PI, I've removed the CP bung, and am only running the IC bung now. All is good and no issues... I do miss seeing the IAT's drop when running the CP bung though, there was something comforting in seeing that.
    17 replies | 324 view(s)
  • The Convert's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:15 PM
    Can't say I wouldn't want to win, because who doesn't want to win stuff, but the fact that Terry felt the need to appease people is amazing. I could honestly care less if BB, or the vendors, ever give one or more of us anything free. I mean, we drive fucking BMWs. If we can't easily afford our mods with no real financial impact, then we shouldn't be buying them...or possibly even the car. End rant.
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:11 PM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum Rwiggins951.
    0 replies | 5 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:58 PM
    Welcome CT-AMG, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 8 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:33 PM
    This is a great race to see with the two previous generation German rivals duking it out with some boost. The C63 AMG belongs to BoostAddict member @gzim335. You likely know the car as it was involved in a controversial race against an F82 M4 with upgraded S55 turbos. The C63 M156 V8 equipped with a Weistec Stage III 3.0 liter twin screw is fast. We know that and an example recently ran 10.1 @ 139 in the 1/4 mile. We do not know which AA supercharger kit is on the E92 M3. It is running meth and higher boost so it is possibly a Level III but hopefully clarification on that will come from the participants. What is clear is that on the stock internals the M156 V8 has an advantage over the S65 V8 on stock internals which is not surprising. The torque certainly pays dividends here as the C63 opens up just enough of a lead to pass the M3 before running into traffic at high speed. While the video is very much appreciated it goes to show how quickly one runs out of space at these speeds and power levels. Hopefully we can see a rematch with multiple runs on open road so it is safer for all involved and nobody has to let off to avoid an accident.
    2 replies | 14 view(s)
  • ninjacoupe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:28 PM
    Sweet!!! Green cubes of goodness heading out. Good luck everyone!
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:24 PM
    As a solution to the dilemma here for those who feel they put in time BMS has generously offered the following: The winner gets an N54 JB4 or $479 BMS store credit, and runner up gets a BMS Dual Cone Intake or $95 store credit. Drawing to take place on Monday after the Super Bowl. Just not in the morning. Feel to boost your numbers until then if you like. Thank you to Terry@BMS for helping me out and the users here as well. He knows I personally appreciate it and owe him one on this. Thank you Terry.
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:12 PM
    23 replies | 248 view(s)
More Activity