Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Clear All
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 04:02 PM
    If you get your turbos upgraded/redone and the original cause was the turbos the smoke should then be gone. That is only if the turbos going bad is the cause to begin with. You need to find the cause.
    14 replies | 220 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    5 replies | 63 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 03:59 PM
    I think it's fine for the community to discuss this but you are actively trying to sell a kit. I mean, you should know that it is against the rules for non-vendors to market in such a fashion.
    2 replies | 37 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 03:58 PM
    You need to be a vendor for this type of post. I won't delete it for now.
    5 replies | 28 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 03:57 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread 6MT Shift Bog - Potential Fixes in N54
    I hear you.
    139 replies | 3080 view(s)
  • str8shot's Avatar
    Today, 03:47 PM
    Yea, $200 is for brand new modified oem fuel lines required to do the install as well as the analyzer and harness.
    5 replies | 28 view(s)
  • subaru335i's Avatar
    Today, 03:40 PM
    Fair enough. I skimmed and thought I saw $200. I have no affiliation with him, just came across it earlier this week.
    5 replies | 28 view(s)
  • str8shot's Avatar
    Today, 03:32 PM
    He wants $124.99 for the module and harness. I'm asking $90 shipped for the essentially the same thing...except my module has multiple outputs and has user upgradeable firmware. That's $34.99 less. :)
    5 replies | 28 view(s)
  • RSL's Avatar
    Today, 03:30 PM
    I see 790-800 as well with 73.8 in the 100% column, but output can be manipulated with other tables. I'll be curious to see if mine shoots over 800 just changing this table.
    5 replies | 61 view(s)
  • 7plagues's Avatar
    Today, 03:28 PM
    Should be interesting what is said about this failure.
    2 replies | 30 view(s)
  • dbarcliff's Avatar
    Today, 03:24 PM
    Upgrading my turbos is seeming more and more like a bad idea. I have some stage 2+ on order right now.. Seems like everyone's turbos are failing in 3k or less.
    2 replies | 30 view(s)
  • quattr0's Avatar
    Today, 03:17 PM
    Must be the lucky guy as I'm sure I'm not the few who bought VTT products. Warranty, 1 year, happened to be expired 2 months ago. Now smoke is coming out like steam engine. @ABR advises "we found bank two turbo is leaking oil internally". Ouch! My stock turbo lasted me more than 5 years. This unlucky one not even more than 3,000+ miles. :angry-banghead: I don't daily drive the e90, just bought f82 last October, and never driven it hard. Maybe I should have driven harder ;-)
    2 replies | 30 view(s)
  • musc's Avatar
    Today, 03:16 PM
    My table is already close to that and has been for about the past 9 months. I see torque in the 790-800nm range on logs. My last column is 98.2 instead of 100 but I think that difference is negligible.
    5 replies | 61 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 03:01 PM
    Hey iassimilt: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 3 view(s)
  • RSL's Avatar
    Today, 03:00 PM
    I'm still on Cobb, but I'll try to test it out and log this weekend.
    5 replies | 61 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 02:49 PM
    silvers2k, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 4 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Today, 02:43 PM
    I'm thinking if the calculated torque values are actually having an effect on type4 bog, which I sort of doubt, but if they are, we can think of a more clever way to improve the issue I think.
    139 replies | 3080 view(s)
  • subaru335i's Avatar
    Today, 02:40 PM
    This seems like a hot topic lol. Someone else just posted a thread selling something exactly like this.
    5 replies | 63 view(s)
  • subaru335i's Avatar
    Today, 02:38 PM
    You might want to pay to be a vendor if you are selling this stuff on here. Another option that seems like it might be cheaper is here: http://www.boostaddict.com/showthread.php?68595-Any-interest-in-a-bluetooth-enabled-inline-ethanol-sensor
    5 replies | 28 view(s)
  • subaru335i's Avatar
    Today, 02:35 PM
    Hey I just made a thread like this the other day.
    2 replies | 37 view(s)
  • subaru335i's Avatar
    Today, 02:30 PM
    subaru335i replied to a thread Bedplate question in N54
    And I for one applaud you for the courage! Doesn't sound like BMW made it easy to rebuild these motors. I think ill take a stout OEM block over an easy to build lego motor any day.
    62 replies | 1173 view(s)
  • fastgti69's Avatar
    Today, 02:18 PM
    I cant test anything for you. I just dont have the guts to mess with any tables myself.
    139 replies | 3080 view(s)
  • jyamona's Avatar
    Today, 02:18 PM
    Is there room to recirc the dump tubes do you think?
    51 replies | 1391 view(s)
  • jyamona's Avatar
    Today, 02:04 PM
    Ok, I think that's what it should do. I am almost 99% certain the table values are a torque %, and not a literal torque value in lb-ft / nm. Try the values above, and log those params. I'm curious to see how the car will make it's more low end torque, at low throttle input as there isn't a boost setpoint or positive pressure at that range.
    5 replies | 61 view(s)
  • NniftyFour's Avatar
    Today, 01:57 PM
    I've been messing with this table for a couple weeks now. For me it added low end torque off boost. Only reason I didn't post about it was I'm getting hesitations after messing with it but I'm 85% sure its a hardware issue. (About to go do injector's now, I have 4 index 2's in there right now :scared-eek: )
    5 replies | 61 view(s)
  • jyamona's Avatar
    Today, 01:57 PM
    I'm starting this thread to compile knowledge of all tables related to Torque and Load in the DME. I already believe the "Requested Torque (Driver)" table has been defined / used incorrectly, and have started that thread here: http://www.bimmerboost.com/showthread.php?68690-Requested-Torque-(Driver)-Discussion&p=656853#post656853 I made that separate for now, as to compile the testing results strictly limited to that tables changes, in one place. Two other torque tables I was able to deduce their purpose from the DAMOS (I'm fairly certain). Torque Loss (Homo) and Torque Loss (Strat). These tables should probably not be modified. It appears they are actually modeled torque losses due to friciton / drag inside the engine. Cobb missed one, as there is a third as well, (Homo+Strat). That just means there is a modeled torque loss for each of the engines 3 operating DI strategies. The only time I could see changes to these tables being useful is when load is being scaled. Then you could copy / paste say the 200 load vals up a column or two, to where the scaling would place it, then interpolate out those vals to the "now empty" 160 / 200 load cells. More to come.
    0 replies | 26 view(s)
  • BoostDr's Avatar
    Today, 01:54 PM
    BoostDr replied to a thread VM Top Mount 1/4 Mile Testing in N54
    I feel ya on the DA...breaking hearts since its inception. Nice adjusted numbers though, looking forward to seeing more updates!
    35 replies | 1591 view(s)
  • BoostDr's Avatar
    Today, 01:50 PM
    Looks like it was a blast!
    9 replies | 1730 view(s)
  • jyamona's Avatar
    Today, 01:45 PM
    So this is interesting... in the DAMOS, the table "Requested Torque (Driver)" (many of us are unsure of it's exact purpose), it's table data is defined as a % (of torque), not an actual torque value, as it was defined in Cobb and in our XDFs. Also of note, in the DAMOS it is called "relative desired moment at rear wheel", aka. requested torque % to the wheels. This would mean, with our current values, at 100% pedal, we are only requesting 73.8% of torque. The DAMOS calibration for this table is also different, in that it requests a full 100% at 100% pedal, along w/ a different gradient at the various speeds. I would like for you all to test these values and report back on anything you notice. Before / after logs showing requested torque, actual torque, requested load, actual load, boost set point / target, and boost will be very helpful. I think this table may help out low end driveability, as well as maybe even increase top end power :) I am testing as well, interested to hear what you all think. Here are the values to try:
    5 replies | 61 view(s)
  • 7plagues's Avatar
    Today, 01:36 PM
    This video has some real gems of language! lol "PUT YOUR F*$KING MOUTH SHUT!!"
    2544 replies | 173685 view(s)
More Activity