Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Popular Articles Last 7 Days Clear All
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    01-25-2015, 11:47 AM
    Put the car on the dyno tonight, for a few runs with the new intakes on. The results were pretty much as expected, we can most likely get more power out of the car, but 640WHP on stage 2's (or RB's), very very doubtful. These results were had with no tuner on hand, Dzenno is Skiing, and made me 2 maps one with low timing and one with the high timing (the same timing we ran last time on the dyno), well due to a miscommunication on my part they were left for IJEOS(shop car), instead of I8AOS for the car these are on. So they were unusable meaning we had one back end flash, with timing set to 10-13.5 up top, which is 2 degrees less then we ran on the previous dyno session records. We also were having a very hard time getting boost smooth in the JB, Terry, and I worked at it for about 20-40 logs, and got it to this level of smoothness, for some reason the PID had to be dropped way down as very small PWM changes were making big swings in boost, even with PID this low boost would still do weird things. It would spool then quickly drop boost, then build it again, which is that little depression in TQ you see from 3500-4250 or so, after that boost would smooth out, and track pretty well to redline. On the previous dyno the Stage 2 record was achieved on 29psi peak to 17.5 psi at redline as that is all we could make. These numbers were achieved with 27 psi peak to 22 psi at redline. We couldn't go any higher as we were getting a LOT of corrections, and LPFP was going nuts, but we can easily hold 25+ psi to redline if we can get the other issues figured out, but BP and shaft speed with those little compressors is going to be up there, and not healthy. If we matched the previous boost in the midrange, and fixed the boost drop off then rebuild issue, the curves down low would basically be identical. As far as LPFP something is really going on there, I will investigate tomorrow, as its pretty scary. With this against us, we still managed to make 576WHP/615WTQ with all these issues, once Dzenno gets back, and we can have a tuner on hand as we dyno, as well as get the LPFP, and boost figured out, the graph will smooth way out, and we have no doubt should achieve 600WHP with a few more psi, and less timing corrections. Either way, the intakes do exactly advertised, offer you much more flow to redline, and a much more flat power curve where it counts in the high end of the rev band. I threw a graph in there against 2+ as well, there really is no comparison, 2+ leaves the 15T's in the dust on about the same boost midrange and 2 psi more up top. All, and all we are happy, and these delivered as expected, once we get tuning sorted, we should have nice clean graph, and right around 600/600. Not bad for a set of Stage 2's...:naughty: Break down: VTT Stage 2's Billet 15T's VTT Silicone intakes VTT Silicone Charge pipe VTT Double Barrel HPFP upgrade Fuel-it Stage 2 LPFP with 450 inline Cobb AP with PTF custom back end flash JB4 100% E85 All runs done in 4th gear Stage 2 Silicone Vs Stage 2 Stock intake Stage 2 Silicone Vs Stage 2+ Data Zap Log http://www.datazap.me/u/vargasturbotech/stage-2-silicone-intake-dyno-run-476?log=0&data=1-3-4-8-10-11-17-25-26-27-28-29 Jb Log
    43 replies | 1503 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-28-2015, 02:19 PM
    Most people will not remember that AMS Performance announced a couple years ago they would be doing a turbo upgrade package for the F10 M5 S63TU engine. This created a big stir in the BMW Performance scene at the time as enthusiasts knew the incredible performance results AMS had achieved with the Nissan GTR. We all know AMS was more than capable of upgrading the turbo hardware at the time but the issue was not the hardware. It was the tuning for the hardware. That is where ESS-Tuning was supposed to come in and provide their tuning 'expertise' with this turbo upgrade. Well, you may have noticed that AMS did not release any S63TU turbo upgrade since this announcement and that ESS-Tuning did not complete any tuning for any aftermarket S63TU turbo upgrade packages. They are not the only ones by the way. Dinan also has yet to come through on F10 M5 / F13 M6 turbocharger upgrades and built S63TU motor promises. So why the big claims and big announcements when both Dinan and ESS-Tuning knew they did not have the capability to tune them at the time? In the case of ESS-Tuning it was likely just a cheap publicity grab designed to get them exposure and fuel their fanboys. In retrospect, it looks downright deceitful and is pretty embarrassing considering they had nothing to back up their claims with the F-Series ECU's just recently being cracked. AMS has their own S63TU tuning solution and will be providing their own tuning for their Alpha 9 S63TU turbo upgrade package. Will anyone even bother to hold ESS-Tuning accountable for tuning claims they could not deliver on? At least one BMW website does not have a short term memory and certainly will. Here is to the future turbo upgrades and quality S63TU tuning options.
    40 replies | 712 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    01-23-2015, 01:32 PM
    Had a chance to get our development M3 strapped down for some preliminary tuning with the PURE turbos. The purpose of the testing was to evaluate the boost control, fueling, and timing, and not necessarily to extract the most power out of the setup. The test car is a 2015 DCT running a JB4, PURE Turbos, ER pipes, BMS meth kit, and K&N drop in filters. The fuel was a mix of 25% E85, 25% 91, and 50% 100. Meth was a 70% mix. There is a lot more than I want to get in to with this post so I'll just throw up a few random notes along with a bit of data. 1) All runs were done using the JB4 progressive meth control which keeps boost at stock like levels UNTIL methanol is flowing. This prevents dangerous tip-in knock and lean conditions that can come along with non-integrated meth kits. And if you ever run out of methanol or got forbid a line comes loose, you don't lose the engine. 2) These PURE turbos spool much better than I expected they would. It's really not that much worse than stock and very similar to RB turbos on an N54 for those of you coming from that platform. 3) Fueling is a major headache. The JB4 is able to alter the air/fuel ratio & fuel trims (within limits) as you can see in the attached dyno charts showing power at various air/fuel ratios. I've found the engine runs much smoother at leaner than I'd expect air/fuel ratios. Like high 12s at higher RPM. If you get it in the 11s it has a nasty misfire/stutter tendency. There is a lot more work to be done on the fueling end and we may also need to tighten up the spark plug gap for these power levels. 4) I've recently started testing a new method for JB4 direct timing adjustment intended for large turbos. It increases the adjustment window an extra 4 degrees or so. I'm thinking it will come in handy for pump gas large turbo tuning. On the current fuel mix & meth at around 29psi I found MBT to be higher than I expected. In the 11-12 degree range at higher RPM. 5) I let off most runs at around 6500-6800rpm but I can verify the turbos hold full boost to redline without issue. I'll wind it out more on the dyno next time around. Up next I'll need to grab some 60-130 times for comparison to the stock turbos! Hoping for 6s! The best our 650whp M5 ever did on a 2% slope was 7.1s.
    23 replies | 1766 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-24-2015, 08:32 AM
    This is not surprising as BimmerBoost last year reported that all wheel drive coming to the M5 is an inevitability. What is surprising is just how quickly things are moving in that direction as BMW is already testing an xDrive all wheel drive equipped F10 M5. This all wheel drive M5 was spotted in Sweden which during the winter as you can see is a pretty good place to test traction. Apparently the front wheels did a slight burnout prompting a photographer to go underneath and see the front driveshaft confirming all wheel drive. All wheel drive is coming because these cars have become so heavy and utilize so much low end torque. The M5 is more about muscle than ever in its history and really is becoming a dragster. Well, the traditional rear wheel drive layout is making traction a problem and considering most owners just want to go fast in a straight line instead of hustle around the track (the old AMG recipe) traction off the line is the point of emphasis. Especially considering that the next generation M5 will likely get a tweaked F10 M5 S63TU 4.4 liter twin turbo V8 with horsepower bumped to the ~630 range. It is unlikely that BMW will release an all wheel drive F10 M5 (although they clearly could) and more likely that this is a test mule for the next generation M5 powertrain which will be very similar to the F10 M5 powertrain. Expect more weight on the nose, more understeer, and for traditional BMW handling characteristics and balance to take a back seat toward straightline performance. It was nice knowing you M.
    27 replies | 1597 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-24-2015, 11:41 AM
    Very nice numbers here from a GIAC tuned Porsche 991 Turbo S. The vehicle is running the GIAC Stage II race gas tune which is an ECU flashed tune. In addition to the tune plus race gas this 991 Turbo S has the Tubi catless race exhaust and the IPD intake plenum. The owner used launch control on the runs and as you can see the car was incredibly consistent. 132 mile per hour traps each time and the 60 foot ranges by less than 1/100 of a second. That is some serious consistency not to mention the launch control system is highly efficient hitting 1.4X. The tires used are Dunlop Sport Maxx Race which is a street tire but basically an R compound. So what else is needed for this car to be the first US 9 second 991 Turbo? Good question. It is somewhat perplexing why US 991 Turbos can not break out of the 10's yet we are seeing many record breaking results on the same dragstrip in the Middle East.
    30 replies | 817 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-23-2015, 04:06 PM
    Low 10 second performance on the stock internal AMG M156 V8? Yep. This Weistec Stage III supercharged W204 C63 is from the Middle East and ran in Abu Dhabi at the Yas Marina 1/4 mile drag strip. The C63 AMG put down a very impressive run of 10.215 @ 136.658 on a 1.470 60 foot time. The car of course features the 3.0 liter twin screw Weistec M156 supercharger package and in addition the Weistec 'Bulletproof' transmission upgrade. As far as C63 AMG's are concerned this is the quickest and fastest stock internal pass recorded. Additionally, compared this time to a 10.4 @ 134.43 an Australian C63 managed with the Weistec Stage III package on pump gas. With race gas and maybe slightly more boost it certainly looks like a 9 second C63 AMG on stock internals is possible. Video below (recorded with a potato unfortunately): EDIT: The car features aftermarket forged internals:
    18 replies | 805 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-26-2015, 12:45 PM
    The M133 engine just continues to impress and the tuning market for the smallest AMG motor just continues to push forward. Here is an A45 AMG that received bolt on modifications from Rebellion Automotive consisting of their tune, downpipe, and intake. The result? 375 horsepower at all four wheels. The torque figure is what is is really eye opening as the car shows 502 newton meters or 370 lb-ft at all four wheels. That mountain of torque is also available fairly early in the powerband. Rebellion claims they picked up 43 wheel horsepower on a competitors tune but did not provide the graph to support this assertion and they did not name the competitor. Additionally, the claim this A45 AMG put down 312 at all four wheels in stock form but once again did not provide a graph as support. Rebellion is using a piggyback tune and with flash tunes progressing on the M133 it will be interesting to see how bolt on tuning plays out for the M133 from here on out.
    18 replies | 628 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-27-2015, 05:24 PM
    Say hello to a new vendor and a new tuner on the scene, Miami Tuning Group. Many of you have seen a lot of S63TU tunes have hit the market in short order as F-Series ECU's have been cracked. What will separate these tunes is namely pricing and features. What is nice to see here are timeslips accompanying the dyno chart. How about cracking 130 in the 1/4 mile with just a tune? This is a Florida result so keep in mind the fuel is 93 octane pump. The M6 turns into quite the beast with just a tune so imagine the possibilities with a race gas tune and bolt ons. Regarding the output figures the S63TU goes to 588 wheel horsepower from the stock 524 wheel horsepower. The peak torque figures rises by just under 100 lb-ft of torque at the wheels getting very close to breaking 600 lb-ft at the wheels. You should also notice the torque gains are through the entire curve. Expect to see more MTG over the next few weeks.
    16 replies | 800 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:53 PM
    LT Motorwerks is a relatively new shop that mostly does work with body kits. They tend to be on the show over go side. As do their customers one of which had LT Motorwerks do the work you will see below on this Porsche 997 GT3. The pictures pretty much tell the story. The owner was a user who goes by the name 'Creamniz' on the forums. In the opinion of this website he is the epitome of (poor) style over substance. He sold this 997 GT3 to a fellow on the forums who did not know what he was getting himself into. He clearly just wanted the money and to move on and that is what happened. Some BMW readers may know of a 3-Series this same Creamniz fellow built which was simply riced out junk in a similar manner to this 997 GT3. He also attempted to sell that car for an inflated price through the forums and we do not know what happened with it and we do not care as it was tasteless. The reason this is being brought to your attention is so you can avoid a situation like this and to remember how cars and shop work are portrayed on forums is not how it always is in reality: Hi everyone, I am a new GT3 owner and new to the forum. Recently purchased a 2007 Porsche GT3 that was a previous forum member Creaminz. This is my first Porsche. I have a small shop in Northern Virginia and was looking for a new shop car. I'm not a fan of the color and several other things so will be changing a lot of things. After actually getting the car in my hands and putting it on a lift I will be changing much more than I originally planned. So now I have made a long long list of parts that will be getting changed. Along with a complete disassemble of the car. I took a lot of pics of the car in its current (delivered) condition and will document the rebuild. I was honestly shocked by many things I found. Here was the car at SEMA And here it is on my lift the other day when I was looking it over and making the list of things needed. I took about 50 pics when it was on the lift documenting a bunch of things that where wrong or just subpar. I messaged the previous owner and his response was that, "the car was fine when I had it" and nothing else. So I have no choice but to make this car right. I will try to post up pics as I have them. Here is just a brief list of some things that will be going on: Custom set of wheels being made now JRZ coilovers Full GMG suspension upgrades (with a proper alignment and corner balance) Custom dyno tune Replacing several other stock suspension parts that have paint over spray on them. The paint job looks like a Maaco paint job currently. Either powdercoating the calipers or going with a new set of StopTechs for front and rear. The calipers are currently 3 colors because they where sprayed on the front and the back are still yellow. They are very ugly. Install proper bracing throughout the car and get rid of the tons of self taping screws and zipties. Full repaint and body work. All of the new panels on the car have waves all in it. So we are going to completely break the car down so that everything is painted. The roll bar is going to be removed and repainted. Going to slightly modify the roll bar so the new harness has a better place to mount. Some carbon fiber parts are being made for the wing, splitters, and other small items. The engine has a rear main seal oil leak so going to fix that also. That's the list for right now. Once the car is completely straight and in proper condition I will look at what I originally had planned for and that is an engine build. But I am not going to worry about that until after the car is in a condition that it deserves. Here are a few pics of the car. I have more but these give you the idea."Custom" BBS wheels...... Instead of having the wheels built proper they just redrilled and changed some barrels up. On the rear wheels they have the huge outer lip that comes out for the widebody. But on the inside the barrel is the size of a normal outer barrel and barely comes flush with the rotor. There was about 6 more inches they could of come inside. Not that I am saying they had to come in all the way. When I first drove the car the steering wheel was shaking like crazy and whenever hitting a bump in the road it was a lane changer. Maybe that is due to the custom BBS wheels or perhaps due to the shock being blown and puking fluid... or perhaps the sway bar end link that is sheared off or the passenger side sway bar end link that is bent..... The seller said, "the car was fine when I drove it all over, it rode like stock". I'm sorry but a John Deere tractor rode smoother than this did when I received it.The calipers where painted and looked like they matched the car in the pics and at the shows..... This demonstrates great quality from a car builder... Um no! The car had no issue is what I was told... Paint quality is on par for a Maaco job.... The widebody kit was supposed to be a Vollkommen Design CF widebody kit. I found out that Creaminz is the owner of Volkommen. I also found out that he bought the kit from Flobmann Auto Design in Germany. The kit was carbon fiber. They cut the cut and extended it several inches. So its carbon where they did not touch it. They hacked the kit up. You can see where they hacked it up. Just not a safe or quality build at all. It is honestly very sad and costing us way more money than planned. I will make sure the car is done right. In the mean time he will be building a 993 RWB. I have plenty other pics but you get the idea.
    15 replies | 145 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-24-2015, 08:31 PM
    The M133 engine is finally getting more flash options on the market. Up until now Renntech was the only tuner offering a real flash tune. The vast majority of the other M133 tuning options were piggyback tunes which of course have their plusses and minuses depending on your tuning goals. Flash tunes tends to offer more control over various parameters but it is ultimately personal preference. What is important is that M133 tuning is taking strides forward which is good for everyone. Eurocharged recorded a baseline wheel horsepower figure of 330. After the tune this rises to 380 for a very impressive gain of 50 wheel horsepower. The baseline torque figure is 334 lb-ft at the wheels. After the tune the peak torque rises to 430 lb-ft at the wheels for a gain of 96 lb-ft. The M133 definitely offers incredibly torque stock and tuned. The turbo does look like it runs out of steam past 5500 rpm though as if the torque did not drop off so sharply the M133 would easily make over 400 wheel horsepower. The Eurocharged tune retails for a very reasonable $999. The ECU must be sent in to either the Houston or Toronto location. OBD-II flashing is not yet possible but that will come with time. This is just the beginning but the future of M133 tuning certainly is bright.
    12 replies | 736 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-27-2015, 06:34 PM
    This may be the first McLaren P1 and LaFerrari comparison test to provide some real data. CAR Magazine put up a pathetic attempt at a comparison between the two last year. Automobile Magazine does a much better job in their write up and data but something still feels amiss. These are very fast million plus dollar supercars that are the absolute bleeding edge of high performance hybrid technology for street cars. That is all fine and dandy but these are not dragsters. Where is the track comparison component? It is somewhat odd we only get 1/4 mile acceleration figure and that some of the other data listed is based off estimates. They did not weigh the cars for example. How much these cars weigh with their hybrid drivetrains and how close the real world weight is to the manufacturer claims is kind of a big deal. We want to see how light high performance hybrid drivetrains can be made. 3150 pounds for the LaFerrari sounds great on paper but it is an estimate. It may way that much or it could be lighter or heavier. The only way to know for sure is to actually test it. Why have a test and omit this? The biggest omission though is the lack of laptimes from a professional driver. Which one of these cars laps a track the quickest? Automobile sort of dances around this stating the P1 sticks with the LaFerrari around Maranello roads. You may know Maranello is in Italy and you may be getting the feeling this was a Ferrari controlled test hence the lack of real data. We do get acceleration figures but considering the article reeks of Ferrari influence and control how much faith do we put into them? Would Ferrari release figures showing anything less than superiority from the LaFerrari? Why is there no video? How were the cars tested? What equipment? Were they tested on the same day? Are you starting to see the problem here? Although this is the best 'comparison' if you want to call it that to date it is still severely lacking. It may be due to Ferrari politics which it probably is. Either way, this is far from over. Ferrari LaFerrari Specifications Base Price: $1.4 million (est) Engine: 6.3L DOHC 48-valve V-12/789 hp @ 9,000 rpm, 516 lb-ft @ 6,750 rpm, plus 161-hp, 199-lb-ft electric motor; 950 hp combined Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic Layout: 2-door, 2-passenger, mid-engine RWD coupe EPA Mileage: 12/16 mpg city/highway Suspension F/R: Control arms/multilink Brakes: Carbon-ceramic discs Tires F/R: 265/30ZR-19 (93Y)/345/30ZR-20 (106Y) Pirelli P Zero Corsa L x W x H: 185.1 x 78.4 x 43.9 in Wheelbase: 104.3 in Weight: 3,150 lb (est) Weight Dist. F/R: 41/59% 0-60 mph: 2.7 sec ¼ Mile: 9.6 sec @ 157.0 mph Top Speed: 217 mph McLaren P1 Specifications Base Price: $1.15 million Engine: 3.8L DOHC 32-valve twin-turbo V-8/ 727 hp @ 7,500 rpm, 531 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm, plus 177-hp , 192-lb-ft electric motor; 904 hp combined Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic Layout: 2-door, 2-passenger, mid-engine RWD coupe EPA Mileage: 17 mpg/18 mpge combined Suspension F/R: Control arms, coil springs Brakes: Carbon-ceramic discs Tires F/R: 245/35ZR-19 (93Y) / 315/30ZR-20 (101Y) Pirelli P Zero Corsa L x W x H: 180.6 x 76.6 x 46.8 in Wheelbase: 105.1 in Weight: 3,300 lb (est) Weight Dist. F/R: 41/59% 0-60 mph: 2.6 sec ¼ Mile: 9.8 sec @ 148.9 mph Top Speed: 217 mph Source
    12 replies | 135 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-26-2015, 08:23 PM
    Interesting comparison here that we do not often get to see which is the same S63TU equipped vehicle dyno'd with a piggyback and with a flash tune. Obviously everyone knows the F generation BMW's were recently cracked and now flash tuning is possible which is an alternative to the already established piggybacks. This comparison is not exactly perfect and there are a few things to keep in mind. First of all, Jailbreak tuning sells flash tunes. It is in their best interest to show a flash tune doing better than a piggyback. Secondly, we do not know what piggyback unit is being used or what map is being used. Results with a piggyback can vary greatly based on the information it is relaying to the ECU so the piggyback numbers are hardly set in stone. What the graph does show is the flash tune appears to be smoother and also it is able to go well past the rev limiter which the piggyback tune can not. The flash provides 36 more wheel horsepower and 32 more lb-ft of torque at the wheels. A higher resolution graph would be appreciated but it is still nice to see an overlay of an F13 M6 with downpipes on the stock tune, piggyback tune, and flash tune.
    6 replies | 1027 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-28-2015, 11:30 AM
    Everyone who has been whining about the C7 Corvette Z06 straightline performance can just STFU already. Seriously, shut up. If this report is true (as it is almost unbelievable) the Corvette Z06 has managed to place itself among the world's most elite performance cars... at any price point. The C7 Z06 8L90 automatic with the Z07 package is reported to have lapped the Nurburgring in 6:59.13. To understand what a sub 7 minute laptime on the 'Ring means let's provide a laptime from million dollar machinery. The Porsche 918 Spyder laps the track in 6 minutes and 57 seconds. That means the new Z06 can hang with Porsche's best for, oh, less than 10% of the money. That is insane! It also places the Corvette Z06 with elite company like the McLaren P1 and even the Ferrari LaFerrari. The Z06 literally can run with the best the world has to offer at any price point. Now, this is all providing the reports are true. All we have to go on is a source that has not provided or referenced any official confirmation. An HD video is supposed to be coming so we will hold our breath before pronouncing the Corvette Z06 as arguably the greatest performance car in all the land.
    13 replies | 126 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-27-2015, 12:10 PM
    The BMW 5 Series GT is a failure. There is no other way to put it. BMW bet against wagons in the USA and thought the crossover and SUV crazy US market would eat up some kind of wagon-sedan-hatchback blend. BMW was wrong but that will not stop them from attempting to force the market to embrace the 5 GT. Germany's Auto Motor Und Sport reports that BMW intends to produce the model again with the next generation 5-Series. The publication also points out the 5 GT is not popular at all in Germany. Where is it popular? In China apparently. As China blocks google access apparently the Chinese population can't search to find out what an attractive BMW design actually looks like. Thanks for keeping this automotive abortion alive China. Source
    6 replies | 692 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-27-2015, 02:01 PM
    The McLaren 650S has a revised award winning McLaren M838T 3.8 liter twin turbo V8 motor offering more power. In stock from the 650S is rated as its name implies at 650 horsepower (641 SAE) up from the 616 in the MP4-12C courtesy of new heads, pistons, cam timing, and a revised exhaust system. The result is an incredible 569 wheel horsepower and 451 lb-ft of wheel torque. With the Fabspeed X-pipe and sport cats horsepower rises to 611 at the wheels and torque is bumped up to 514 for a gain of 63 lb-ft at the wheels. When the cats are bypassed using the Fabspeed pipes power rises to 620 and peak torque is at 509. The peak torque figure does not tell the whole story as later on in the curve there are torque gains which provide the power boost. These are very nice gains from exhaust modifications. Imagine adding in a tune and maybe some race gas. 650 wheel horsepower seems well within reason on the 650S with bolt ons.
    12 replies | 183 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-23-2015, 12:19 PM
    To run low 10's in an MP4-12C all you need is a tune and drag radials. Here is the proof as that is exactly what AMS Performance achieved. This McLaren MP4-12C features only an AMS Alpha Tune for 93 octane pump fuel and drag radials. Yep, those are the only modifications. AMS states their tune gains over 100 horsepower at the crank over the 616 horsepower MP4-12C file. We would like to see a dyno at the wheels but here are the AMS crank figures on 93 octane pump: Average gain of 100 horsepower and 105 ft-lbs of TQ throughout the entire RPM range Power increases of over 115HP compared to the stock tune between 4600 to 6900 rpm Torque increases of 124 ft-lbs compared to the stock tune between 4500 to 5600 rpm Alpha tune maximum HP output: 716 HP vs stock tune 629 HP Alpha tune maximum TQ output: 601 ft-lbs vs stock tune 476 ft-lbs The addition of drag rubber makes it possible for the MP4-12C to hook well with an impressive 1.58 60 foot time. The result is a 10.159 @ 138.19 pass. Another way to look at this is that with exhaust modifications as well as race gas this car is well into the 9's. Also to put this result in context, check out what McLarenBoost member @AWD75 did with his stock MP4-12C on street rubber: http://www.mclarenboost.com/content.php?4737-McLarenBoost-member-takes-his-stock-MP4-12C-to-the-dragstrip-and-runs-a-10-6-135 The scary thing is that the MP4-12C looks to be 9 second capable as well as 140+ mile per hour trap speed capable with bolt ons and pump gas. Well done @ALPHA Performance!
    8 replies | 133 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:51 PM
    Most M3/M4 owners will opt for large 20 inch HRE wheels. This particular owner cares more about handling performance than looks which BimmerBoost certainly respects. He went for lightweight 18 inch HRE R101 wheels and had IND-Distribution install KW V3 coilovers. Any serious enthusiast will also upgrade the brakes which is exactly what was done here. Brembo's 380mm GT brake kit was installed. 3D Design carbon body pieces complete the look. Blue on gold may not be for everyone but whatever one thinks of the color scheme this car is ready for the track. Thank you @HRE_Wheels and @IND-Distribution for the photos ( @Nate@IND @Ilia@IND )
    5 replies | 263 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-28-2015, 02:57 PM
    We spend so much time quantifying cars based on data here and get so caught up in numbers we forget the intrinsic qualities vehicles bring. Ultimately, a car is supposed to serve as transport. There are many reasons for needing to reach a different location and Jeremy Clarkson highlights a very special journey below. Clarkson explains the premise very well and this is quite a touching reminder of what is truly important in life:
    4 replies | 236 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-25-2015, 10:37 AM
    Fabspeed announced last year they would offer a tune for the Porsche 991 Turbo and 991 Turbo S. The initial graph they posted showed 95 horsepower gains although the graph was from a European dyno showing crank figures. The European dyno makes sense as it appears Fabspeed is rebranding a European piggyback. At the time Fabspeed stated nobody had the ability to flash the 991 Turbo ECU which was incorrect as GIAC had and has that ability. At $4995 it is difficult to defend the Fabspeed piggyback with the GIAC flash option on the market. Porsche tax? Yep. Regardless here are the dyno results for the Fabspeed module on a Porsche 991 Turbo. All wheel horsepower goes from 486 wheel horsepower to 537 wheel horsepower for a gain of 51 horses at all four wheels. The torque figure is very impressive for the 991 Turbo even in stock form as it puts down 607 lb-ft to all four wheels. With the tune 672 lb-ft at the wheels is available as early as 2600 rpm making for a huge kick in the pants down low. $5k for this module though? It would make sense as a value option compared to the GIAC flash. As it stands... well, decide for yourself.
    2 replies | 679 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-26-2015, 01:41 PM
    We all know the Shelby GT350R is going to be a badass track car considering it improves on the already badass Shelby GT350 with further track oriented refinements. If the laptime being reported is true Ford truly raised the bar for what an American pony car is capable of. 7:32.19 is over 5 seconds quicker than what Chevrolet managed in the Camaro Z28 which itself is incredibly potent. To put the laptime in further context the GT350R laps the 'Ring just ahead of a Ferrari 458 Italia and right behind a Porsche 997 GT2. Pretty good company wouldn't you say? There is no official confirmation yet of this laptime or video evidence. Really, no proof of any kind so everyone is just taking EVO's word for it. EVO is a credible source so we expect an official release supporting their story soon. We do not even have the GT350R full specs yet but what we do know is the GT350R is shaping up to best one of the best American track cars and arguably the best track car value in the world. Source
    5 replies | 140 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-28-2015, 12:53 PM
    The Liberty Walk riveted body kits have garnered quite a bit of attention. They certainly are interesting and generate discussion. The design tends to be love it or hate it and it does not work on every car. Here is a good example of that as the Lamborghini Huracan seemingly is better off without it. LamboBoost saw the Liberty Walk Aventador in person at SEMA and that design worked fairly well. The Huracan application just is not nearly as clean and the proportions are somewhat awkward. There will be opinions all over the place but the opinion of this website as that the LB Works widebody kit does not work on the Huracan.
    4 replies | 103 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-23-2015, 01:12 PM
    Most users on this network know FFTEC from their BMW N54 turbo upgrade work. FFTEC does a lot more than just BMW's and tackles a variety of turbo platforms. The turbo kit you see below is FFTEC's Nissan GTR VR38DETT turbo upgrade kit which definitely shows some impressive numbers. We not not have the full specs but let's take a look at the kit and the numbers it has achieved on the dragstrip: As per usual FFTEC the hardware quality looks great. What about the performance? This GTR consistently runs 158-161 trap speeds in the 1/4 mile with the FFTEC kit: Low 9's and 160's, not bad at all. Regarding pricing we are still waiting on that information as well as the complete specification rundown with options. For now, enjoy the preview of the kits capability. @MikeB@FFTEC
    4 replies | 120 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-25-2015, 12:13 PM
    Weistec Engineering held a Concourse event at their facility this past weekend in Santa Ana, California. The turnout was quite large as you can see. Fortunately, Weistec has a good amount of parking around their ample sized facility which was able to accommodate. Weistec is primarily known for their Mercedes-AMG work but as you can see what they do generates interest from enthusiasts across the spectrum. In addition to a variety of Benzes you will see everything from Lamborghinis, to Ferraris, to bikes, etc. Turnouts like this prove how big of a name Weistec has become. If they continue to do this event yearly they will likely soon need a bigger venue. Congratulations to @Weistec for how they have come and a successful event. Enjoy the photos. CAR NINJAS PHOTOS FROM HERE ON
    0 replies | 669 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-24-2015, 08:53 AM
    The Acura NSX debut at the Detroit Auto Show was somewhat overshadowed by Ford taking over the entire show with a barrage of performance cars. Well, that is what Acura gets for teasing the new NSX forever and finally getting burned by losing the spotlight. That is how it goes but an interesting tidbit that came out of the show that everyone glossed over was that the chief engineer for the NSX Ted Klaus said to expect a Type R variant. The previous NSX of course was offered in Type R guise just not in the USA. So what would a Type R variant mean? Probably 30 or so more horsepower than the standard 550 the NSX offers along with some weight stripped out. An all wheel drive twin turbo V6 NSX with 580 horsepower and a 9-speed DCT transmission moving a more hardcore and lighter version? Sounds good to us. Source
    3 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:01 PM
    AMS Performance offers their M157 tune for both the 4Matic and RWD M157 AMG models. The W212 generation E63 AMG launched with a rear wheel drive M157 drivetrain as most readers know. The facelift of the model changed the styling slightly and added the most notable difference between the two which is 4Matic all wheel drive. The difference in power and torque between the two M157 drivetrains when tuned is negligible. Take a look at this M157 4Matic and rear wheel drive dyno comparison to see for yourself. The traction difference however makes all the difference on the dragstrip. This is not a perfect apples to apples comparison as the cars were run on different days on different dragstrips with different modifications but the AMS tune only RWD E63 went 11.29 @ 126.48. Their 4Matic tuned W212 E63 AMG with AMS downpipes and cat-back exhaust went 10.879 @ 129.21. If the rear wheel drive car received the AMS downpipes and cat-back exhaust (along with some drag rubber) what do you think would happen? In the opinion of BenzBoost it would be very close with it coming down to the launch which of course favors the 4Matic car. From a roll though the ~250 pounds lighter RWD E63 AMG would be favored. Great results here regardless. Owner impressions: “I just wanted to let you know how impressed I am with tune in my 2012 Mercedes Benz E63 AMG. It has been nearly six months since the tune was installed and the car has performed flawlessly. There have been zero CEL’s, and driving around town you would never know the kind of power lurking under the hood. The car’s street manners are exactly the same as stock, but when I get in it, there is an impressive surge of power. Speed limits are exceeded almost instantly. A few weeks ago, I brought the car to Byron Dragway and was very satisfied with the results. The Benz laid down a best of 11.2@126 & 11.3@127, both with fairly gentle 1.8 sixty ft times. This was done on Bridgestone summer performance tires. With a harder launch, I think very low 11’s or even a high 10 is possible. Quite amazing for an otherwise completely stock car! Several people at the track, including the announcer, were really impressed. Combined with the fact I still get over 20mpg around town, the car is probably the best “muscle car” I’ve owned. I am very pleased with the whole AMS experience, and can’t wait for some of your new Mercedes products to be released.”
    2 replies | 144 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-25-2015, 09:53 AM
    An absolutely awesome Vengeance Racing VRSC850 package build here. The C7 Stingray LT1 gets 12 psi of boost courtesy of a Paxton Novi 1500 centrifugal blower. The owner opted to stroke the motor getting a new crank along with new forged internals. In addition American Racing headers Vengeance Racings ported LT1 heads, a VR cam, and methanol injection are added into the mix. The result on 12 psi and 93 octane pump gas with the meth is 851 horsepower at the wheels and 794 lb-ft of torque at the wheels. Performance that can be replicated every day if the owner desires. The full build is below. It certainly makes a strong argument for modifying a base base C7 for power rather than the C7 Z06. Recently, we had a client of ours come by with his white C7 Corvette looking for some changes. He wanted to do some simpler modifications like lowering the car, exhaust and short shifter, but the real goal was to extract as much as he could out of the C7 platform on pump gas. With our proven C7 Corvette Performance Packages, it made the decision for us and the client easy. We decided to move right on to the top and go with our VRSC850 Performance Package with the ECS Novi 1500 supercharger running at 12psi. With all of the supporting mods, this would equate to great power and reliability that was ready for the street. The first stage in the process of building out the VRSC850 package is to take care of the short block. The bottom end of the LT1 power plant is stroked out to 416c.i. and the internals go to a forged rotating assembly thanks to products from Callies, Wiseco, ARP and Calico. In addition to the short block mods, a set of VR CNC ported LT1 cylinder heads are outfitted and VR stage 1 416 cam is installed. After motor assembly is complete, we bolted up the ECS 1500 supercharger and laid the motor in the cradle. As the air exits, it now passes through a set of American Racing Headers longtube headers. We also installed the AlkyControl dual nozzle methanol injection system to cool the charge and add fueling/octane to the system for more power. Modifications Installed VRSC850 C7 Corvette Performance Package Includes: VR 416c.i. LT1 Stroker bottom end - Callies 4" crank/Callies 6.125 Rods/Wiseco Custom Forged Pistons/Calico coated bearings/ARP fasteners VR CNC Ported LT1 Cylinder Heads VR Custom Camshaft Kit - VR Stage I 416 camshaft American Racing Headers Longtube Header System B&B Bullet Exhaust System MGW Short Throw Shifter ECS Novi 1500 Supercharger @ 12psi AlkyControl Dual Nozzle Methanol Lowered on OEM bolts OEM Intake Manifold Vengeance Racing Professional Installation Vengeance Racing Custom ECU Calibration How how did the new build on this C7 perform? Final power levels after our Vengeance Racing custom ECU calibration came out to 851.82rwhp and 794.08wtq on 93oct and meth injection!
    2 replies | 137 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-25-2015, 11:02 AM
    Since the launch of the MP4-12C McLaren has continued to refine the platform. They offered a 616 horsepower ECU tune upgrade for the MP4-12C. They then launched the 650S model with refined styling and more power. It appears the 650S is about to be updated as well with a new 675 LT model. Whether the styling changes is anyone's guess but the test mule does have the front and rear lights covered. Does this mean more P1 inspired touches? That can only be a good thing. Regarding the motor it is getting a power boost to 666 horsepower. How this will be achieved has yet to be disclosed but it could be with changes to the tune or exhaust. They likely will refine both aspects. The car is expected to also drop a significant 100 kilograms. That is a significant drop and should make the 675 LT model just absurdly fast on top of the already very fast 650S. Expect an official reveal in Geneva in March and for the model to be limited to 250 units rather than for it to replace the 650S outright. Source
    2 replies | 128 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-28-2015, 11:57 AM
    Going over 200 miles per hour is fast. Going over 200 miles per hour in a 1/2 mile (2640 feet) is ballistic. AMS Performance set a new Nissan GTR 1/2 mile record of 224.327 miles per hour at the recent WannaGoFast standing 1/2 mile event in Florida. This was achieved by their Alpha Omega upgraded GTR. It is also VBOX verified using GPS at 224.91 miles per hour. The specifications for the Alpha Omega GTR are listed below. Congratulations to AMS on a new 1/2 mile GTR world record and continuing to raise the bar. AMS Alpha Omega GTR: Performance Specifications Quarter Mile: 7.700 @ 186.51 MPH *current R35 GTR record (current best MPH: 190.3) Standing Mile: 233mph *gear limited/done at 1250whp Standing Half Mile: 214.04mph 60-130mph: 2.46 Seconds 30-130mph: 3.32 Seconds *current overall record 100-150mph: 2.15 Seconds *current overalll record 0-186mph(0-300KPH): 7.56 Seconds *current overall record 0-60mph: 1.53 Seconds 0-100mph: 2.79 Seconds 100-200mph: 5.42 Seconds 0-200mph: 10.49 Seconds Engine: Alpha 4.0L Big Bore Engine Alpha CNC Ported Cylinder Heads (w/ Ferrea Valvetrain Component Package) Alpha Omega GT-R Custom Camshafts Turbo/Exhaust: Upgraded Alpha Omega Turbo Kit TiAL Q Blow-off Valves Full Alpha GT-R Exhaust System (includes Alpha and Alpha spec components) Fuel: Alpha Fuel Rail Kit ID 2000 Fuel Injectors (6) Alpha Omega Spec Fuel System Transmission: Alpha Omega Transmission Upgrade Package (by Shepherd Transmission) Intake/Intercooler: Alpha GT-R Intake Manifold Alpha CNC Ported Throttle Bodies Alpha Omega Spec. Intercooler System Interior: Full 8 point Roll cage with Swing out door bars and removable parachute assembly Alpha Tillet Seats Alpha Tillet Seat Brackets Exterior: Alpha Carbon fiber 2x2 V-weave Matte Finish Hood Alpha Carbon fiber 2x2 Twill weave Matte Finish Roof Alpha Carbon fiber 2x2 V-weave Matte Finish Trunk lid Super sweet Omega spec Vinyl Decals APR GTSpec Side Mirrors Aerocatch hood pins Engine Management/Electronics: Syvecs Stand-alone Engine Management System Suspension/Rims/Tires: Enkei 18” RPF01 Front wheels with M&H 275/45/18 Racemaster Drag radials Alpha Drag Wheel and tire combo in the rear Alpha Upgraded CCM brake kit front and rear Alpha Drag Suspension upgrade
    2 replies | 105 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:51 PM
    Transmission control unit tuning is becoming just as important engine control unit tuning these days. Especially with dual clutch transmissions in applications with increased torque. Fortunately AMR Performance has TCU software for VW/Audi applications in three stages of tune. The breakdown is as follows: Stage 1 TCU Upgrade: - Designed for daily driving. Firmer shifting patterns. Smoother driving shift points and responsive full throttle. Stage 2 TCU Upgrade: - Designed for daily driving weekend warrior. More aggressive full throttle shift points and firmer daily driven shift patterns. Stage 3 TCU Upgrade: - Designed for the "race" / "aggressive" driver. Severe aggressive and extreme shifting patterns. What Stage someone needs is up to their application. The AMR TCU software is a very reasonable $599.99. We will have to see if their software can accommodate upgraded clutch discs as well. Further details: http://shop.amrperformance.com/AMR-DSG-S-Tronic-TCU-Upgrade_p_508.html
    2 replies | 76 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-23-2015, 04:40 PM
    The new Focus RS is a bigger deal than it ever has been before. Why? Because Ford will finally sell the Focus RS in the USA. Not to mention that they are giving it all wheel drive for the first time ever and up to 350 horsepower from a tweaked Ecoboost four-cylinder borrowed from the Mustang. If you are worried all wheel drive will make the car less fun to drive the video Ford just posted should alleviate your concerns. The chassis looks plenty playful with the car drifting all over. With plenty of turbo torque, it should be more fun (and powerful) than ever before. Ford is on a performance car roll to say the least. Expect the official reveal on the 3rd next month.
    1 replies | 148 view(s)
More Activity