Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Last 30 Days Clear All
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Today, 10:55 PM
    Hey thanks for the post! Just to be clear, no one received any "old" pipes, there will be no production changes, we made 3 sets of samples, and test fit them all. On the 3rd revision we were happy, and we had 20 sets made from those. We then sold all 20 sets of the inlets, most all are installed, half of them by people in their garage with minimal tools, the feedback we have been getting is almost all the same. A pain to install (as an inlet will be) but once wrestled into place, they fit perfectly, as we designed them too. If you had issues with the front pipe, it is possible maybe you got a bad inlet, that was not molded properly etc, but the front pipe on a RHD should fit the same as on a LHD. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.
    21 replies | 192 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 10:47 PM
    AdminTeam has just uploaded test test 443! test test 443 test test 4
    0 replies | 2 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 10:46 PM
    That said I think upgraded twins are best for you. If you don't care about top end punch and want nice driveability go with modded stock frames.
    7 replies | 94 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 10:46 PM
    So was the Supra and we know what dominates there. The amount of turbos the motor has to start with doesn't necessarily mean much. The gallardo starts with zero turbos.
    7 replies | 94 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 10:41 PM
    AdminTeam has just uploaded test test! test test test test test
    0 replies | 2 view(s)
  • 3000gt MR's Avatar
    Today, 10:33 PM
    3000gt MR replied to a thread Ethanol vs methanol in N54
    93oct and about 1600-1700cc's or about 268-300cc per cyl of meth is all I'll need to safely run my end goal of 700. I may turn bost up another psi or 2 for the half miles but ill see how she does. I run a boost pump to the main pump and increased flow about 70%. I have my own methods of tuning it but for my needs i've built it with plenty of head room
    14 replies | 140 view(s)
  • The Convert's Avatar
    Today, 10:31 PM
    Get some AST coil overs.
    100 replies | 2547 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Today, 10:24 PM
    Ingeniator replied to a thread Ethanol vs methanol in N54
    Yeah but how much can you flow off the one pump. It isn't very big and as your boost goes up your flow will go down. I can't see you getting much over 800 on this setup. But I'll wait and see.
    14 replies | 140 view(s)
  • 3000gt MR's Avatar
    Today, 10:21 PM
    3000gt MR replied to a thread Ethanol vs methanol in N54
    heres a couple pics
    14 replies | 140 view(s)
  • 3000gt MR's Avatar
    Today, 10:10 PM
    3000gt MR replied to a thread Ethanol vs methanol in N54
    Why? I basically run that with 1/6th the electrical solenoids and moving parts. I like the way the meth controllers fail safe if something shall happen. You dont really get that with the PI kits. Additionally the PI kits cost more than almost triple than a port meth set up. I just dont see the benefit of it
    14 replies | 140 view(s)
  • 135pats's Avatar
    Today, 09:52 PM
    Jeez I totally abandoned this thread. My bad. Been out of town for most of the last 3 months so i'm really just now getting around to tuning. Getting port fuel 100% has taken a bit of time, and there's still a lot of work to do on that front. But for the time being, wanted to share a 20PSI log with E60. http://www.datazap.me/u/135pats/4th-gear-e60?log=0&data=1-3-4-10-11-18-24 It's below freezing right now, which is insulting. But as it warms up, i'll be turning the boost up to more like 23-25PSI to see when the transmission gets pissed. Jake's working on some cool things to keep it from getting too cranky, his work has been awesome as always. One interesting thing i've noticed is that under medium load, the turbo almost feels like it's spooling into the surgeline if you load up 4th gear then shift into 5th. It could just be perception on my part, but it "feels" like mild surge. Would probably just speak to the manifold being rather efficient with heat, but i'd need to log it first. BTW any of you have recommendations for coils? These STs are way, way too soft :awesome:
    100 replies | 2547 view(s)
  • Ingeniator's Avatar
    Today, 09:33 PM
    Ingeniator replied to a thread Ethanol vs methanol in N54
    Now that they have port kits why not run meth in a separate tank to the port rail. Been thinking of doing this or running e98. I would have a flush tank to run gasoline to prevent corrosion though. I've also been debating trying it on the di but might wait until I sleeve a motor.
    14 replies | 140 view(s)
  • Flinchy's Avatar
    Today, 09:32 PM
    Flinchy replied to a thread Anyone fit VTT inlets RHD? in N54
    yeah but the only difference with the LHD, is you can get your hand up there a tiny bit easier... it'd be basically just as difficult to fit 135i2 made it seem like it was a specific problem for RHD *only* for the VTT inlets no matter what inlet is used, there's going to be challenges fitting it... just like downpipes with the limited squeezy hand space.
    21 replies | 192 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 09:30 PM
    ArnetteNyh, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 4 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    3 replies | 200 view(s)
  • rader1's Avatar
    Today, 09:17 PM
    Start to finish expect to spend no less than $10K when going with a single turbo setup. Fueling, suspension, dyno time and other random expenses you don't foresee add up quickly.
    7 replies | 94 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 09:16 PM
    This is the same manual C7 Z06 we previously saw go 9.872 @ 138.42. The weather was warmer this time out but the car is clearly pulling harder up top as evidenced by the three miles per hour gained. It looks like they worked out the fueling and tuning issues that were costing the car some trap speed. There is more in this of course but this is a very nice result based on the mod list: - Fasterproms custom tune by Jeremy Formato - Fasterproms custom 2.31 pulley - Fasterproms Ported Supercharger - Modified air box, and air duct with modified AFE CAI - Fasterproms Thermal reduction plates That reduce blower heat soak - Fasterproms Flex fuel kit- 50% E85 blend - Fasterproms 1.5Gal Expansion tank - ARH 1.875 headers - Hoosier 315/30/18 dr's In cooler weather (600 density altitude) this car should have another couple miles per hour in it. We're starting to get an idea for what bolt on mods can do for the Z06 LT4 though and the benefits flex fuel with ethanol brings.
    0 replies | 15 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 09:14 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Who are you? Nobody cares.
    122 replies | 1271 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 09:13 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    It is so unbelievably frustrating. I feel like I'm speaking another language sometimes. I don't know why it is so hard for people to understand. By the way, Vortech released a billet impeller for the YSI. I wasn't even running it previously. Guys in racing classes have picked up 3 miles per hour from the impeller switch alone. It might shock people to know nobody races a V3si. There's probably a reason for that. Regardless, you can push 2000 cfm with the blower now (and spin it to 80k rpm). I don't even know why this is a discussion. Well, it's because I have the most powerful E92 and people desperately want to try to take that away. Unfortunately for them, the laws of physics still exist. Fucking amen. Finally someone understands.
    122 replies | 1271 view(s)
  • alex@ABRhouston's Avatar
    Today, 09:10 PM
    I see a direct relationship to bad driving and bad music.
    1411 replies | 103567 view(s)
  • 4doorbmwpower's Avatar
    Today, 09:09 PM
    4doorbmwpower replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    EXACTLY what i was looking for! I love when people try to beat around the bush. especially when it comes to CFM, volume, or just basic physics. I can even start to realize having no knowlege of that engine besides what you told me that at 15 psi on that block you are not capable of making 800hp...
    122 replies | 1271 view(s)
  • lughed's Avatar
    Today, 09:08 PM
    lughed replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Same here... I just laugh. I read these threads on this board and just laugh. Seems real simple. Who has that type of ego, puts up that type of money and time then claims the car is done and challenges everyone only to have the car sit around and do nothing. I wouldn't be surprised if the car isn't running at all. Seems pretty obvious stick's car doesn't put down what he claims. It would be nearly impossible to keep that under wraps. How is one scared to post his own info on his board? Scared of scrutiny? If a car truly makes that amount of power, there is nothing anyone can say about. Whatever happen to shutting up the haters? Why is he constantly asking for slips as proof and more info on a build but doesn't provide these for his own sake? I've been reading this shit since I was neg repped out of posting. I had the respond to this one though. This guy is a clown.
    122 replies | 1271 view(s)
  • 4doorbmwpower's Avatar
    Today, 08:58 PM
    drfrink24, I know those are completely different but my argument is that the engine was designed around using two turbochargers... not one. Not the fact that it was designed for those two turbos (referring to OEM). But TWO of any type.. still was never designed to run a single turbocharger. BMW clearly tailored the N55 around utilizing ONE turbo. This (n54) was clearly engineered by those same guys for TWO. Thats what i was saying.
    7 replies | 94 view(s)
  • foe516's Avatar
    Today, 08:56 PM
    i would think so, slicksilver saw 30 hp increase on the other forum. i dont know how much more aggresive his tune was though. at least the op picked up 30 ftlb tq with the same exact tune.
    2 replies | 61 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 08:52 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    You can't post it because it never happened. Why even bother lying? For what? Just tell the people what happened. Holy crap man lololol you're this insecure? I KNOW WHAT HAPPENED WITH YOUR CAR. If that isn't clear enough how about the fact that you can't go to 18 psi? Or that you did not hit 800 whp with 15 psi as it's impossible? Do you even understand the specs or volumetric efficiency? Please post your graph/runfile and make me look stupid. Please. I dare you. Clearly.
    122 replies | 1271 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 08:51 PM
    flow2007, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 5 view(s)
  • img's Avatar
    Today, 08:48 PM
    img replied to a thread New S65 Record? 785whp in S65
    Sticky, I just cracked the 800 whp mark today with another lb of boost. This put me at 15psi. Should I just go to 18psi or wait for you to catch up. I won't post it till you get your monster YSI boosting ! this is going to be fun. The difference is, I can afford it. You can't ! Its as simple as that. I'm enjoying my weekend, hope you guys as well.
    122 replies | 1271 view(s)
More Activity